用自动化矿物学对混凝土骨料中微量硫化铁浓度进行分类和定量

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Nikolas Oberhardt, Stefanie Lode, Jan Lindgård, Kurt Aasly
{"title":"用自动化矿物学对混凝土骨料中微量硫化铁浓度进行分类和定量","authors":"Nikolas Oberhardt,&nbsp;Stefanie Lode,&nbsp;Jan Lindgård,&nbsp;Kurt Aasly","doi":"10.1617/s11527-025-02591-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Iron sulfide concentrations and mineral associations triggering the internal deterioration of concrete structures are still enigmatic. Incidences of internal sulfate attacks induced by iron sulfide-containing concrete aggregates appear worldwide. Severe cases are reported from Canada, the United States of America, and Ireland. Moreover, conservative limits for the total sulfur content of aggregates increased the need to dispose of otherwise high-quality resources for concrete production. The maximum threshold values for total elemental sulfur in the European standard EN-12620 for concrete aggregates are <span>\\(\\le\\)</span> 1 wt.<span>\\(\\%\\)</span>, and as little as <span>\\(\\le\\)</span>0.1 wt.<span>\\(\\%\\)</span> if the non-stoichiometric iron-sulfide pyrrhotite (Fe<sub>(1-x)</sub>S) is present in the rock. This study investigates the potential of scanning electron microscopy-based automated mineralogy for mineral classification and the quantitative quality assessment for concrete aggregate material. Identifying the stoichiometrically closely related disulfide pyrite and monosulfide pyrrhotite is emphasized. The iron/sulfur ratio and greyscale variations in the electron backscatter images between pyrite and pyrrhotite were tested as additional differentiation criteria when acquiring mineral mapping and point-of-interest analysis. The added greyscale criterion yielded a better distinction between the two chemically similar phases. A good correlation was achieved when comparing results from energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy in automated mineralogy with wavelength-dispersive spectroscopy point analyses on the electron microprobe. Semi-quantification of the chemical data from automated mineralogy was computed for the total sulfur content in the petrographic samples. The total sulfur content of bulk samples, investigated by high-temperature combustion and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy, was consistent with the semi-quantitative results of automated mineralogy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"58 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617/s11527-025-02591-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification and quantification of minor iron-sulfide concentrations in concrete aggregate using automated mineralogy\",\"authors\":\"Nikolas Oberhardt,&nbsp;Stefanie Lode,&nbsp;Jan Lindgård,&nbsp;Kurt Aasly\",\"doi\":\"10.1617/s11527-025-02591-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Iron sulfide concentrations and mineral associations triggering the internal deterioration of concrete structures are still enigmatic. Incidences of internal sulfate attacks induced by iron sulfide-containing concrete aggregates appear worldwide. Severe cases are reported from Canada, the United States of America, and Ireland. Moreover, conservative limits for the total sulfur content of aggregates increased the need to dispose of otherwise high-quality resources for concrete production. The maximum threshold values for total elemental sulfur in the European standard EN-12620 for concrete aggregates are <span>\\\\(\\\\le\\\\)</span> 1 wt.<span>\\\\(\\\\%\\\\)</span>, and as little as <span>\\\\(\\\\le\\\\)</span>0.1 wt.<span>\\\\(\\\\%\\\\)</span> if the non-stoichiometric iron-sulfide pyrrhotite (Fe<sub>(1-x)</sub>S) is present in the rock. This study investigates the potential of scanning electron microscopy-based automated mineralogy for mineral classification and the quantitative quality assessment for concrete aggregate material. Identifying the stoichiometrically closely related disulfide pyrite and monosulfide pyrrhotite is emphasized. The iron/sulfur ratio and greyscale variations in the electron backscatter images between pyrite and pyrrhotite were tested as additional differentiation criteria when acquiring mineral mapping and point-of-interest analysis. The added greyscale criterion yielded a better distinction between the two chemically similar phases. A good correlation was achieved when comparing results from energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy in automated mineralogy with wavelength-dispersive spectroscopy point analyses on the electron microprobe. Semi-quantification of the chemical data from automated mineralogy was computed for the total sulfur content in the petrographic samples. The total sulfur content of bulk samples, investigated by high-temperature combustion and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy, was consistent with the semi-quantitative results of automated mineralogy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials and Structures\",\"volume\":\"58 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617/s11527-025-02591-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02591-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02591-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

硫化铁浓度和矿物关联引发混凝土结构内部劣化仍然是一个谜。含硫化铁混凝土骨料引起的内硫酸盐侵蚀在世界范围内都有发生。加拿大、美利坚合众国和爱尔兰都报告了严重病例。此外,对骨料总硫含量的保守限制增加了处置用于混凝土生产的优质资源的需要。在欧洲标准EN-12620中,混凝土集料的总元素硫的最大阈值为\(\le\) 1 wt. \(\%\),如果岩石中存在非化学计量的硫化铁磁黄铁矿(Fe(1-x)S),则最小阈值为\(\le\) 0.1 wt. \(\%\)。本研究探讨了基于扫描电子显微镜的自动矿物学在混凝土骨料矿物分类和定量质量评价中的潜力。强调了化学计量学上密切相关的二硫黄铁矿和单硫磁黄铁矿的鉴别。在获得矿物测绘和兴趣点分析时,测试了黄铁矿和磁黄铁矿之间的铁硫比和电子背散射图像中的灰度变化,作为额外的区分标准。增加的灰度标准可以更好地区分两种化学上相似的相。将自动化矿物学中的能量色散x射线能谱分析结果与电子探针上的波长色散能谱点分析结果进行了比较,得到了较好的相关性。对自动化矿物学的化学数据进行了半定量计算,计算了岩石样品中的总硫含量。用高温燃烧和电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱法测定了样品的总硫含量,与自动化矿物学的半定量结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classification and quantification of minor iron-sulfide concentrations in concrete aggregate using automated mineralogy

Iron sulfide concentrations and mineral associations triggering the internal deterioration of concrete structures are still enigmatic. Incidences of internal sulfate attacks induced by iron sulfide-containing concrete aggregates appear worldwide. Severe cases are reported from Canada, the United States of America, and Ireland. Moreover, conservative limits for the total sulfur content of aggregates increased the need to dispose of otherwise high-quality resources for concrete production. The maximum threshold values for total elemental sulfur in the European standard EN-12620 for concrete aggregates are \(\le\) 1 wt.\(\%\), and as little as \(\le\)0.1 wt.\(\%\) if the non-stoichiometric iron-sulfide pyrrhotite (Fe(1-x)S) is present in the rock. This study investigates the potential of scanning electron microscopy-based automated mineralogy for mineral classification and the quantitative quality assessment for concrete aggregate material. Identifying the stoichiometrically closely related disulfide pyrite and monosulfide pyrrhotite is emphasized. The iron/sulfur ratio and greyscale variations in the electron backscatter images between pyrite and pyrrhotite were tested as additional differentiation criteria when acquiring mineral mapping and point-of-interest analysis. The added greyscale criterion yielded a better distinction between the two chemically similar phases. A good correlation was achieved when comparing results from energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy in automated mineralogy with wavelength-dispersive spectroscopy point analyses on the electron microprobe. Semi-quantification of the chemical data from automated mineralogy was computed for the total sulfur content in the petrographic samples. The total sulfur content of bulk samples, investigated by high-temperature combustion and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy, was consistent with the semi-quantitative results of automated mineralogy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信