氩等离子体射流产生的活性氧和活性氮对水中金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的不同失活机制

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Junghyun Lim, Seungil Park, Seungmin Ryu, Sanghoo Park and Min Sik Kim*, 
{"title":"氩等离子体射流产生的活性氧和活性氮对水中金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的不同失活机制","authors":"Junghyun Lim,&nbsp;Seungil Park,&nbsp;Seungmin Ryu,&nbsp;Sanghoo Park and Min Sik Kim*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c1036310.1021/acs.est.4c10363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) is a promising technology for inactivating waterborne pathogens by generating diverse reactive species under ambient conditions. However, uncertainties regarding the bacterial inactivation mechanisms persist due to varying findings in prior research. This study aimed to clarify the inactivation mechanisms of two representative bacteria, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (<i>S. aureus</i>, Gram-positive) and <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>, Gram-negative), using an argon-based APPJ (Ar-APPJ) system in a controlled medium, primarily deionized water. We identified several reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), including hydrogen peroxide, peroxynitrous acid/peroxynitrite (ONOOH/ONOO<sup>–</sup>), hydroxyl radical (<sup>•</sup>OH), and hydroperoxyl radical/superoxide radical, and evaluated their roles in bacterial inactivation. Inactivation experiments and quantification of suspected RONS revealed that ONOOH was the primary lethal agent for <i>S. aureus</i>, while <sup>•</sup>OH predominantly inactivated <i>E. coli</i>. Assessment of cell membrane integrity and intracellular RONS levels showed that <i>E. coli</i>, with its thinner cell wall, was more vulnerable to surface damage caused by <sup>•</sup>OH. In contrast, for <i>S. aureus</i>, with its thicker cell wall, intracellular attack by penetrated ONOOH, being significantly more diffusive than <sup>•</sup>OH, was more effective, as <sup>•</sup>OH alone could not induce sufficient surface damage. These findings advance our understanding of bacterial inactivation by the Ar-APPJ and provide valuable insights for designing effective water disinfection strategies utilizing this technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 6","pages":"3276–3285 3276–3285"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different Inactivation Mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in Water by Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species Generated from an Argon Plasma Jet\",\"authors\":\"Junghyun Lim,&nbsp;Seungil Park,&nbsp;Seungmin Ryu,&nbsp;Sanghoo Park and Min Sik Kim*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.4c1036310.1021/acs.est.4c10363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) is a promising technology for inactivating waterborne pathogens by generating diverse reactive species under ambient conditions. However, uncertainties regarding the bacterial inactivation mechanisms persist due to varying findings in prior research. This study aimed to clarify the inactivation mechanisms of two representative bacteria, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (<i>S. aureus</i>, Gram-positive) and <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>, Gram-negative), using an argon-based APPJ (Ar-APPJ) system in a controlled medium, primarily deionized water. We identified several reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), including hydrogen peroxide, peroxynitrous acid/peroxynitrite (ONOOH/ONOO<sup>–</sup>), hydroxyl radical (<sup>•</sup>OH), and hydroperoxyl radical/superoxide radical, and evaluated their roles in bacterial inactivation. Inactivation experiments and quantification of suspected RONS revealed that ONOOH was the primary lethal agent for <i>S. aureus</i>, while <sup>•</sup>OH predominantly inactivated <i>E. coli</i>. Assessment of cell membrane integrity and intracellular RONS levels showed that <i>E. coli</i>, with its thinner cell wall, was more vulnerable to surface damage caused by <sup>•</sup>OH. In contrast, for <i>S. aureus</i>, with its thicker cell wall, intracellular attack by penetrated ONOOH, being significantly more diffusive than <sup>•</sup>OH, was more effective, as <sup>•</sup>OH alone could not induce sufficient surface damage. These findings advance our understanding of bacterial inactivation by the Ar-APPJ and provide valuable insights for designing effective water disinfection strategies utilizing this technology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 6\",\"pages\":\"3276–3285 3276–3285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c10363\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c10363","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大气压等离子体射流(APPJ)是一种在环境条件下产生多种活性物质灭活水传播病原体的技术。然而,由于先前研究的不同发现,关于细菌失活机制的不确定性仍然存在。本研究旨在阐明金黄色葡萄球菌(金黄色葡萄球菌,革兰氏阳性)和大肠杆菌(大肠杆菌,革兰氏阴性)两种代表性细菌的失活机制,采用氩基APPJ (Ar-APPJ)系统在受控介质中,主要是去离子水。我们鉴定了几种活性氧和活性氮(RONS),包括过氧化氢、过氧亚硝酸盐/过氧亚硝酸盐(ONOOH/ONOO -)、羟基自由基(•OH)和氢过氧自由基/超氧自由基,并评估了它们在细菌灭活中的作用。对疑似RONS的灭活实验和定量分析表明,ONOOH是金黄色葡萄球菌的主要致死剂,而•OH主要灭活大肠杆菌。细胞膜完整性和细胞内RONS水平的评估表明,大肠杆菌细胞壁较薄,更容易受到•OH的表面损伤。相比之下,对于具有较厚细胞壁的金黄色葡萄球菌,穿透ONOOH的细胞内攻击比•OH弥漫性明显更强,更有效,因为仅•OH不足以引起足够的表面损伤。这些发现促进了我们对Ar-APPJ对细菌灭活的理解,并为利用该技术设计有效的水消毒策略提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Different Inactivation Mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in Water by Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species Generated from an Argon Plasma Jet

Different Inactivation Mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in Water by Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species Generated from an Argon Plasma Jet

The atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) is a promising technology for inactivating waterborne pathogens by generating diverse reactive species under ambient conditions. However, uncertainties regarding the bacterial inactivation mechanisms persist due to varying findings in prior research. This study aimed to clarify the inactivation mechanisms of two representative bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, Gram-positive) and Escherichia coli (E. coli, Gram-negative), using an argon-based APPJ (Ar-APPJ) system in a controlled medium, primarily deionized water. We identified several reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), including hydrogen peroxide, peroxynitrous acid/peroxynitrite (ONOOH/ONOO), hydroxyl radical (OH), and hydroperoxyl radical/superoxide radical, and evaluated their roles in bacterial inactivation. Inactivation experiments and quantification of suspected RONS revealed that ONOOH was the primary lethal agent for S. aureus, while OH predominantly inactivated E. coli. Assessment of cell membrane integrity and intracellular RONS levels showed that E. coli, with its thinner cell wall, was more vulnerable to surface damage caused by OH. In contrast, for S. aureus, with its thicker cell wall, intracellular attack by penetrated ONOOH, being significantly more diffusive than OH, was more effective, as OH alone could not induce sufficient surface damage. These findings advance our understanding of bacterial inactivation by the Ar-APPJ and provide valuable insights for designing effective water disinfection strategies utilizing this technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信