{"title":"碳排放标度的基本原理:对行业同行比较和碳效率指数的影响","authors":"Sunil Dutta , Jinsung Hwang , Panos N. Patatoukas","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We show that carbon intensity metrics, used to assess emissions efficiency across firms, vary significantly depending on the financial metric used to scale emissions. This variation—driven by within-sector differences in profit margins, asset and labor utilization, and valuation multiples—results in substantial reshuffling of firms' carbon intensity rankings relative to their peers. At the market level, the choice of scaling variable shapes the composition of carbon-efficient indices, which overweight (underweight) firms with lower (higher) carbon intensity within each sector. While carbon-efficient indices deliver returns comparable to the standard market index, they differ in carbon footprints and transaction costs. Indices scaled by market cap or enterprise value achieve lower carbon footprints by overweighting lower-emitting firms with higher valuation multiples but exhibit higher turnover. These findings underscore the critical role of scaling variable selection in carbon efficiency comparisons and highlight a tradeoff between carbon savings and transaction costs for emissions-focused investors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 108300"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fundamentals of carbon emissions scaling: Implications for sector peer comparisons and carbon efficient indexing\",\"authors\":\"Sunil Dutta , Jinsung Hwang , Panos N. Patatoukas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We show that carbon intensity metrics, used to assess emissions efficiency across firms, vary significantly depending on the financial metric used to scale emissions. This variation—driven by within-sector differences in profit margins, asset and labor utilization, and valuation multiples—results in substantial reshuffling of firms' carbon intensity rankings relative to their peers. At the market level, the choice of scaling variable shapes the composition of carbon-efficient indices, which overweight (underweight) firms with lower (higher) carbon intensity within each sector. While carbon-efficient indices deliver returns comparable to the standard market index, they differ in carbon footprints and transaction costs. Indices scaled by market cap or enterprise value achieve lower carbon footprints by overweighting lower-emitting firms with higher valuation multiples but exhibit higher turnover. These findings underscore the critical role of scaling variable selection in carbon efficiency comparisons and highlight a tradeoff between carbon savings and transaction costs for emissions-focused investors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325001239\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325001239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fundamentals of carbon emissions scaling: Implications for sector peer comparisons and carbon efficient indexing
We show that carbon intensity metrics, used to assess emissions efficiency across firms, vary significantly depending on the financial metric used to scale emissions. This variation—driven by within-sector differences in profit margins, asset and labor utilization, and valuation multiples—results in substantial reshuffling of firms' carbon intensity rankings relative to their peers. At the market level, the choice of scaling variable shapes the composition of carbon-efficient indices, which overweight (underweight) firms with lower (higher) carbon intensity within each sector. While carbon-efficient indices deliver returns comparable to the standard market index, they differ in carbon footprints and transaction costs. Indices scaled by market cap or enterprise value achieve lower carbon footprints by overweighting lower-emitting firms with higher valuation multiples but exhibit higher turnover. These findings underscore the critical role of scaling variable selection in carbon efficiency comparisons and highlight a tradeoff between carbon savings and transaction costs for emissions-focused investors.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.