IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Weiwei Zhan , Laurie G. Baise , James Kaklamanos
{"title":"A geospatial model for site response complexity","authors":"Weiwei Zhan ,&nbsp;Laurie G. Baise ,&nbsp;James Kaklamanos","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>One-dimensional (1D) site response models assume vertically incident SH waves propagating through laterally uniform soil layers. These assumptions, collectively referred to as the SH1D model, are widely used in site-specific ground motion predictions. However, many studies have demonstrated the limitations of 1D site-response analyses. The term “site response complexity” (SRC) refers to the degree of discrepancy between the observed empirical transfer function (ETF) and the theoretical transfer function (TTF) computed with SH1D modeling. We present a geospatial approach to estimate site response complexity using statistical and machine learning methods with globally or regionally available geospatial proxies. Our site response data are from 114 vertical seismometer arrays in Japan’s Kiban-Kyoshin network (KiK-net) used in Kaklamanos and Bradley (2018). The SRC data are calibrated according to the Thompson et al. (2012) taxonomy that relies on two parameters, <em>r</em> (Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the ETF and TTF) and <em>σ</em><sub><em>i</em></sub> (inter-event variability of the ETF). We examine 18 geospatial proxies associated with site stiffness, topography, basin, and saturation conditions. Using the geospatial proxies as explanatory variables, two sets of predictive models are developed: (a) linear regression models for predicting <em>r</em> and <em>σ</em><sub><em>i</em></sub>, separately, and (b) multiclass classification models for site response complexity. The regression results suggest that predicting <em>σ</em><sub><em>i</em></sub> has greater accuracy than predicting <em>r.</em> Our optimal SRC classification model uses the slope-based <em>V</em><sub>S30</sub> (average shear-wave velocity in the upper 30 m), global sedimentary deposit thickness, and global water table depth as explanatory variables, and has classification accuracies of 0.66 and 0.65 against the training and testing datasets, respectively. We generate maps across Japan for <em>r</em>, <em>σ</em><sub><em>i</em></sub>, and SRC class, separately, which can provide first-order approximations of site response complexity, and exhibit clear patterns between SRC class and topography. We conclude that the geospatial modeling approach is promising for evaluating complexity in site response across broad regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 109282"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125000752","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一维(1D)场地响应模型假定垂直入射的 SH 波在横向均匀的土层中传播。这些假设统称为 SH1D 模型,被广泛用于特定场地的地动预测。然而,许多研究已经证明了一维场地响应分析的局限性。场地响应复杂性"(SRC)是指观测到的经验传递函数(ETF)与 SH1D 模型计算出的理论传递函数(TTF)之间的差异程度。我们提出了一种地理空间方法,利用统计和机器学习方法以及全球或区域可用的地理空间代用指标来估算站点响应复杂性。我们的场地响应数据来自 Kaklamanos 和 Bradley(2018 年)使用的日本 Kiban-Kyoshin 网络(KiK-net)中的 114 个垂直地震仪阵列。SRC 数据根据汤普森等人(2012 年)的分类法进行校准,该分类法依赖于两个参数,即 r(ETF 与 TTF 之间的皮尔逊相关系数)和 σi(ETF 的事件间变异性)。我们研究了与站点刚度、地形、盆地和饱和度条件相关的 18 个地理空间代用指标。利用地理空间代用指标作为解释变量,建立了两套预测模型:(a) 分别预测 r 和 σi 的线性回归模型,以及 (b) 预测站点响应复杂性的多级分类模型。回归结果表明,预测 σi 比预测 r 更准确。我们的最佳 SRC 分类模型使用基于坡度的 VS30(上部 30 米的平均剪切波速度)、全球沉积厚度和全球地下水位深度作为解释变量,对训练数据集和测试数据集的分类精度分别为 0.66 和 0.65。我们为 r、σi 和 SRC 类别分别生成了日本各地的地图,这些地图可以提供站点响应复杂性的一阶近似值,并显示出 SRC 类别和地形之间的清晰模式。我们的结论是,地理空间建模方法在评估广泛地区的站点响应复杂性方面大有可为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A geospatial model for site response complexity
One-dimensional (1D) site response models assume vertically incident SH waves propagating through laterally uniform soil layers. These assumptions, collectively referred to as the SH1D model, are widely used in site-specific ground motion predictions. However, many studies have demonstrated the limitations of 1D site-response analyses. The term “site response complexity” (SRC) refers to the degree of discrepancy between the observed empirical transfer function (ETF) and the theoretical transfer function (TTF) computed with SH1D modeling. We present a geospatial approach to estimate site response complexity using statistical and machine learning methods with globally or regionally available geospatial proxies. Our site response data are from 114 vertical seismometer arrays in Japan’s Kiban-Kyoshin network (KiK-net) used in Kaklamanos and Bradley (2018). The SRC data are calibrated according to the Thompson et al. (2012) taxonomy that relies on two parameters, r (Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the ETF and TTF) and σi (inter-event variability of the ETF). We examine 18 geospatial proxies associated with site stiffness, topography, basin, and saturation conditions. Using the geospatial proxies as explanatory variables, two sets of predictive models are developed: (a) linear regression models for predicting r and σi, separately, and (b) multiclass classification models for site response complexity. The regression results suggest that predicting σi has greater accuracy than predicting r. Our optimal SRC classification model uses the slope-based VS30 (average shear-wave velocity in the upper 30 m), global sedimentary deposit thickness, and global water table depth as explanatory variables, and has classification accuracies of 0.66 and 0.65 against the training and testing datasets, respectively. We generate maps across Japan for r, σi, and SRC class, separately, which can provide first-order approximations of site response complexity, and exhibit clear patterns between SRC class and topography. We conclude that the geospatial modeling approach is promising for evaluating complexity in site response across broad regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信