Kyleisha J. Foote, James W. A. Grant, Pascale M. Biron
{"title":"世界各地溪流中的鲑鱼生物量:定量综述","authors":"Kyleisha J. Foote, James W. A. Grant, Pascale M. Biron","doi":"10.1111/faf.12887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Salmonid fishes are one of the best studied fish taxa, but little is known about their biomass distribution. We created a dataset using published material for over 1000 rivers with estimated salmonid biomass, covering 27 countries, and 11 species. The distribution of salmonid biomass and production across streams was skewed to the right with a mean biomass and production of 5.2 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> (range = 0–70.3 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) and 6.3 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>/year (range = 0.03–50.2 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>/year), respectively. The top 10% and 1% of salmonid streams in the world had a biomass > 11.9 and 36.5 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>, respectively, and a production > 13.9 and 25.6 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>/year, respectively. Salmonid production was positively correlated with biomass (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.82, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 194), with a mean production to biomass (P/B) ratio of 1.08, which differed among species. Mean biomass declined 38% over time, from 8.6 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> before 1980 to 5.4 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> in 2000–2020. Biomass was also higher in small streams (< 10 m wide) and in streams where smaller areas were sampled. Brown trout (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>Salmo trutta</jats:italic></jats:styled-content>) streams represented a higher proportion of those with biomass > 10 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> than many other species. In addition to the variables mentioned above, salmonid biomass in streams was affected by species, season, method of sampling, elevation, latitude, and migratory strategy. Expanding the list of variables would be useful for developing models to predict salmonid biomass and the conditions for an outstanding salmonid stream, defined as a stream which has a biomass estimate in the top 1% worldwide.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salmonid Biomass in Streams Around the World: A Quantitative Synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Kyleisha J. Foote, James W. A. Grant, Pascale M. Biron\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/faf.12887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Salmonid fishes are one of the best studied fish taxa, but little is known about their biomass distribution. We created a dataset using published material for over 1000 rivers with estimated salmonid biomass, covering 27 countries, and 11 species. The distribution of salmonid biomass and production across streams was skewed to the right with a mean biomass and production of 5.2 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> (range = 0–70.3 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) and 6.3 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>/year (range = 0.03–50.2 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>/year), respectively. The top 10% and 1% of salmonid streams in the world had a biomass > 11.9 and 36.5 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>, respectively, and a production > 13.9 and 25.6 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>/year, respectively. Salmonid production was positively correlated with biomass (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.82, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 194), with a mean production to biomass (P/B) ratio of 1.08, which differed among species. Mean biomass declined 38% over time, from 8.6 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> before 1980 to 5.4 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> in 2000–2020. Biomass was also higher in small streams (< 10 m wide) and in streams where smaller areas were sampled. Brown trout (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\"><jats:italic>Salmo trutta</jats:italic></jats:styled-content>) streams represented a higher proportion of those with biomass > 10 g/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> than many other species. In addition to the variables mentioned above, salmonid biomass in streams was affected by species, season, method of sampling, elevation, latitude, and migratory strategy. Expanding the list of variables would be useful for developing models to predict salmonid biomass and the conditions for an outstanding salmonid stream, defined as a stream which has a biomass estimate in the top 1% worldwide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12887\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12887","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Salmonid Biomass in Streams Around the World: A Quantitative Synthesis
Salmonid fishes are one of the best studied fish taxa, but little is known about their biomass distribution. We created a dataset using published material for over 1000 rivers with estimated salmonid biomass, covering 27 countries, and 11 species. The distribution of salmonid biomass and production across streams was skewed to the right with a mean biomass and production of 5.2 g/m2 (range = 0–70.3 g/m2) and 6.3 g/m2/year (range = 0.03–50.2 g/m2/year), respectively. The top 10% and 1% of salmonid streams in the world had a biomass > 11.9 and 36.5 g/m2, respectively, and a production > 13.9 and 25.6 g/m2/year, respectively. Salmonid production was positively correlated with biomass (r = 0.82, n = 194), with a mean production to biomass (P/B) ratio of 1.08, which differed among species. Mean biomass declined 38% over time, from 8.6 g/m2 before 1980 to 5.4 g/m2 in 2000–2020. Biomass was also higher in small streams (< 10 m wide) and in streams where smaller areas were sampled. Brown trout (Salmo trutta) streams represented a higher proportion of those with biomass > 10 g/m2 than many other species. In addition to the variables mentioned above, salmonid biomass in streams was affected by species, season, method of sampling, elevation, latitude, and migratory strategy. Expanding the list of variables would be useful for developing models to predict salmonid biomass and the conditions for an outstanding salmonid stream, defined as a stream which has a biomass estimate in the top 1% worldwide.
期刊介绍:
Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.