目的:对生物化学专业医学本科生的形成性评价进行结构化实践考核。

Shilpa Suneja, Charanjeet Kaur
{"title":"目的:对生物化学专业医学本科生的形成性评价进行结构化实践考核。","authors":"Shilpa Suneja, Charanjeet Kaur","doi":"10.25259/NMJI_517_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Assessment is a process that includes ascertainment of improvement in students' performance over time, motivation of students to study, evaluation of teaching methods and ranking of students. Despite the new competency-based medical education, assessment remains a largely untouched aspect. Most medical colleges still follow the conventional practical examination (CPE) methods that raise concerns about examiner variability, standardisation, and assessment uniformity. Objective structured practical examination (OSPE) includes objective testing through direct observation, knowledge assessment, comprehension, and skills. We studied the feasibility and acceptability of OSPE as a method of formative assessment of practical skills in biochemistry and to determine faculty and student perception of OSPE as an assessment tool. Methods Phase 1 MBBS students of the 2020-21 batch of Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, were divided into two groups of 85 students each. The first group was assessed for Competency-1 through CPE and the second group was assessed for the same competency through OSPE. These students were then crossed over. The first group was now assessed for Competency-2 through OSPE and the second through CPE for the same competency. The process was repeated for the third and fourth competencies. Thus, two crossovers were performed with four OSPEs and their corresponding CPEs. The mean scores of the students were compared using both assessment methods, using an unpaired student 't' test. Bland-Altman analysis was done to compare differences between OSPE and CPE. Student and faculty feedback was collected on a 5-point Likert scale for close-ended questions, and a thematic analysis of open-ended questions was done. Results When assessed with OSPE, students' mean scores were found to be significantly higher (p<0.001) than CPE. Cronbach alpha of the questions administered had high internal consistency with a score of 0.83 for students and 0.89 for the faculty. Conclusion OSPE can be used for formative assessments in undergraduate medical students in biochemistry as it is feasible and acceptable to both students and faculty and brings a level of objectivity and structure to the assessment process.</p>","PeriodicalId":519891,"journal":{"name":"The National medical journal of India","volume":"37 5","pages":"261-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objective structured practical examination (OSPE) for formative assessment of medical undergraduates in Biochemistry.\",\"authors\":\"Shilpa Suneja, Charanjeet Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/NMJI_517_2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Assessment is a process that includes ascertainment of improvement in students' performance over time, motivation of students to study, evaluation of teaching methods and ranking of students. Despite the new competency-based medical education, assessment remains a largely untouched aspect. Most medical colleges still follow the conventional practical examination (CPE) methods that raise concerns about examiner variability, standardisation, and assessment uniformity. Objective structured practical examination (OSPE) includes objective testing through direct observation, knowledge assessment, comprehension, and skills. We studied the feasibility and acceptability of OSPE as a method of formative assessment of practical skills in biochemistry and to determine faculty and student perception of OSPE as an assessment tool. Methods Phase 1 MBBS students of the 2020-21 batch of Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, were divided into two groups of 85 students each. The first group was assessed for Competency-1 through CPE and the second group was assessed for the same competency through OSPE. These students were then crossed over. The first group was now assessed for Competency-2 through OSPE and the second through CPE for the same competency. The process was repeated for the third and fourth competencies. Thus, two crossovers were performed with four OSPEs and their corresponding CPEs. The mean scores of the students were compared using both assessment methods, using an unpaired student 't' test. Bland-Altman analysis was done to compare differences between OSPE and CPE. Student and faculty feedback was collected on a 5-point Likert scale for close-ended questions, and a thematic analysis of open-ended questions was done. Results When assessed with OSPE, students' mean scores were found to be significantly higher (p<0.001) than CPE. Cronbach alpha of the questions administered had high internal consistency with a score of 0.83 for students and 0.89 for the faculty. Conclusion OSPE can be used for formative assessments in undergraduate medical students in biochemistry as it is feasible and acceptable to both students and faculty and brings a level of objectivity and structure to the assessment process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The National medical journal of India\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"261-266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The National medical journal of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/NMJI_517_2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National medical journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/NMJI_517_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景评估是一个过程,包括确定学生在一段时间内表现的改善,学生学习的动机,教学方法的评价和学生排名。尽管新的以能力为基础的医学教育,评估仍然是一个很大程度上未触及的方面。大多数医学院仍然遵循传统的实践考试(CPE)方法,这引起了对考官可变性、标准化和评估统一性的担忧。客观结构化实践考试(OSPE)包括通过直接观察、知识评估、理解和技能的客观测试。我们研究了OSPE作为生物化学实践技能形成性评估方法的可行性和可接受性,并确定教师和学生对OSPE作为评估工具的看法。方法将新德里Vardhman Mahavir医学院和Safdarjung医院2020-21期一期MBBS学生分为两组,每组85人。第一组通过CPE评估胜任力-1,第二组通过OSPE评估相同的胜任力。然后这些学生被交叉了。第一组现在通过OSPE评估能力-2,第二组通过CPE评估同样的能力。第三和第四项能力也重复了这一过程。因此,对4个spe及其相应的cpe进行了两次交叉。使用两种评估方法比较学生的平均分数,使用非配对学生t检验。采用Bland-Altman分析比较OSPE与CPE的差异。学生和教师的反馈以李克特5分制收集封闭式问题,并对开放式问题进行专题分析。结果采用OSPE进行评估时,学生的平均得分显著提高(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Objective structured practical examination (OSPE) for formative assessment of medical undergraduates in Biochemistry.

Background Assessment is a process that includes ascertainment of improvement in students' performance over time, motivation of students to study, evaluation of teaching methods and ranking of students. Despite the new competency-based medical education, assessment remains a largely untouched aspect. Most medical colleges still follow the conventional practical examination (CPE) methods that raise concerns about examiner variability, standardisation, and assessment uniformity. Objective structured practical examination (OSPE) includes objective testing through direct observation, knowledge assessment, comprehension, and skills. We studied the feasibility and acceptability of OSPE as a method of formative assessment of practical skills in biochemistry and to determine faculty and student perception of OSPE as an assessment tool. Methods Phase 1 MBBS students of the 2020-21 batch of Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, were divided into two groups of 85 students each. The first group was assessed for Competency-1 through CPE and the second group was assessed for the same competency through OSPE. These students were then crossed over. The first group was now assessed for Competency-2 through OSPE and the second through CPE for the same competency. The process was repeated for the third and fourth competencies. Thus, two crossovers were performed with four OSPEs and their corresponding CPEs. The mean scores of the students were compared using both assessment methods, using an unpaired student 't' test. Bland-Altman analysis was done to compare differences between OSPE and CPE. Student and faculty feedback was collected on a 5-point Likert scale for close-ended questions, and a thematic analysis of open-ended questions was done. Results When assessed with OSPE, students' mean scores were found to be significantly higher (p<0.001) than CPE. Cronbach alpha of the questions administered had high internal consistency with a score of 0.83 for students and 0.89 for the faculty. Conclusion OSPE can be used for formative assessments in undergraduate medical students in biochemistry as it is feasible and acceptable to both students and faculty and brings a level of objectivity and structure to the assessment process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信