2021年印度辅助生殖技术法案的法律微妙之处。

Richa Mishra, Sahil Thakral
{"title":"2021年印度辅助生殖技术法案的法律微妙之处。","authors":"Richa Mishra, Sahil Thakral","doi":"10.25259/NMJI_785_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infertility is a widespread medical issue that profoundly affects couples, subjecting them to a roller coaster of emotions often marked by grief and loss. For many, the natural occurrence of conception holds a sense of miraculous success, often overshadowing the prospects of surrogacy or assisted reproductive technology (ART). Diverse factors contribute to infertility, including unidentified causes, age-related concerns, lifestyle choices and medical conditions. ART treatments are vital in aiding infertile couples facing these challenges. The Government of India introduced The ART (Regulation) Act, 2021, which brought much-anticipated regulation to reproductive practices. The Act's primary objectives are to oversee ART clinics and banks, ensuring the ethical and safe delivery of services while preventing potential abuse. However, it falls short in addressing critical issues related to the equal rights of LGBTQIA+ community, single fathers and unmarried couples residing together. These omissions are important. We discuss how the ART Act contradicts the principles of equal rights and the existing legal stance on the rights of same-sex couples. Although the Act brings regulation to the industry, it simultaneously gives rise to a range of legal issues, encompassing rights, scientific advancements, international surrogacy, obligations and moral dilemmas. The focus on equal rights for all, irrespective of sexual orientation or relationship status, remains a pivotal aspect that must be addressed in the context of reproductive regulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":519891,"journal":{"name":"The National medical journal of India","volume":"37 5","pages":"272-274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal subtleties of the Indian Assisted Reproductive Technology Act of 2021.\",\"authors\":\"Richa Mishra, Sahil Thakral\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/NMJI_785_2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Infertility is a widespread medical issue that profoundly affects couples, subjecting them to a roller coaster of emotions often marked by grief and loss. For many, the natural occurrence of conception holds a sense of miraculous success, often overshadowing the prospects of surrogacy or assisted reproductive technology (ART). Diverse factors contribute to infertility, including unidentified causes, age-related concerns, lifestyle choices and medical conditions. ART treatments are vital in aiding infertile couples facing these challenges. The Government of India introduced The ART (Regulation) Act, 2021, which brought much-anticipated regulation to reproductive practices. The Act's primary objectives are to oversee ART clinics and banks, ensuring the ethical and safe delivery of services while preventing potential abuse. However, it falls short in addressing critical issues related to the equal rights of LGBTQIA+ community, single fathers and unmarried couples residing together. These omissions are important. We discuss how the ART Act contradicts the principles of equal rights and the existing legal stance on the rights of same-sex couples. Although the Act brings regulation to the industry, it simultaneously gives rise to a range of legal issues, encompassing rights, scientific advancements, international surrogacy, obligations and moral dilemmas. The focus on equal rights for all, irrespective of sexual orientation or relationship status, remains a pivotal aspect that must be addressed in the context of reproductive regulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The National medical journal of India\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"272-274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The National medical journal of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/NMJI_785_2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National medical journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/NMJI_785_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不孕不育是一个广泛存在的医学问题,深刻地影响着夫妻,使他们经历情绪的过山车,通常以悲伤和失落为特征。对许多人来说,自然受孕是一种奇迹般的成功,往往使代孕或辅助生殖技术(ART)的前景黯然失色。造成不孕症的因素多种多样,包括不明原因、与年龄有关的担忧、生活方式的选择和医疗条件。抗逆转录病毒治疗对于帮助面临这些挑战的不育夫妇至关重要。印度政府出台了《2021年抗逆转录病毒治疗(监管)法》,为生殖实践带来了备受期待的监管。该法案的主要目标是监督抗逆转录病毒治疗诊所和银行,确保提供合乎道德和安全的服务,同时防止潜在的滥用。然而,对于LGBTQIA+群体、单身父亲和未婚同居伴侣的平等权利等关键问题的解决却存在不足。这些遗漏很重要。我们将讨论ART法案是如何与平等权利原则和同性伴侣权利的现有法律立场相矛盾的。尽管该法案为该行业带来了监管,但同时也引发了一系列法律问题,包括权利、科学进步、国际代孕、义务和道德困境。注重所有人的平等权利,不论其性取向或关系状况如何,仍然是必须在生殖条例范围内处理的关键方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal subtleties of the Indian Assisted Reproductive Technology Act of 2021.

Infertility is a widespread medical issue that profoundly affects couples, subjecting them to a roller coaster of emotions often marked by grief and loss. For many, the natural occurrence of conception holds a sense of miraculous success, often overshadowing the prospects of surrogacy or assisted reproductive technology (ART). Diverse factors contribute to infertility, including unidentified causes, age-related concerns, lifestyle choices and medical conditions. ART treatments are vital in aiding infertile couples facing these challenges. The Government of India introduced The ART (Regulation) Act, 2021, which brought much-anticipated regulation to reproductive practices. The Act's primary objectives are to oversee ART clinics and banks, ensuring the ethical and safe delivery of services while preventing potential abuse. However, it falls short in addressing critical issues related to the equal rights of LGBTQIA+ community, single fathers and unmarried couples residing together. These omissions are important. We discuss how the ART Act contradicts the principles of equal rights and the existing legal stance on the rights of same-sex couples. Although the Act brings regulation to the industry, it simultaneously gives rise to a range of legal issues, encompassing rights, scientific advancements, international surrogacy, obligations and moral dilemmas. The focus on equal rights for all, irrespective of sexual orientation or relationship status, remains a pivotal aspect that must be addressed in the context of reproductive regulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信