Leonard Grob, Yann Schwerzmann, Dario Kaiser, Bernd Jung, Thilo Schweizer, Stefan P Huettenmoser, Scilla Dozio, Adrian T Huber, Martina Boscolo Berto, Christoph Gräni, Dominik P Guensch, Kady Fischer
{"title":"回顾性时间分辨率插值改变压缩感知CMR的心肌应变定量。","authors":"Leonard Grob, Yann Schwerzmann, Dario Kaiser, Bernd Jung, Thilo Schweizer, Stefan P Huettenmoser, Scilla Dozio, Adrian T Huber, Martina Boscolo Berto, Christoph Gräni, Dominik P Guensch, Kady Fischer","doi":"10.1007/s10554-025-03348-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Compressed sensing (CS) is a rapidly developing technique that can acquire functional cines of the heart within seconds while free-breathing and it is ideal for assessing cardiac function in non-typical conditions such as when patients are sedated or anaesthetized or undergoing stress exams. CS cines can further include retrospective temporal resolution interpolation (INTP<sub>TR</sub>) to improve the frame count per heartbeat, and the impact of INTP<sub>TR</sub> on biventricular functional measurements is unknown. We investigated the impact of INTP<sub>TR</sub> on left and right ventricular volumetry and strain measurements of CS cines. Nineteen patients with 51 different CS acquisitions were prospectively enrolled. CS cines were acquired at rest, under adenosine stress, oxygen inhalation or while under general anaesthesia with mechanical ventilation. From the same CS acquisition, a dataset with and without INTP<sub>TR</sub> were generated by the scanner. The outputs were separated and analysed by blinded readers for left and right ventricular volumetry, as well as systolic and diastolic strain parameters using feature-tracking techniques. Measurements were compared between the INTP<sub>TR</sub> and non-INTP<sub>TR</sub> outputs. Similar measurements were obtained for biventricular volumes and ejection fraction independent of INTP<sub>TR</sub>. Peak strain was significantly underestimated on INTP<sub>TR</sub> cines for both longitudinal and circumferential orientations (p < 0.01). Nevertheless, good-to-excellent correlations were observed between the two measurements (r > 0.65, p < 0.01), and there was still a high area under the curve (AUC ≥ 0.95, p < 0.01) for detecting abnormal patients defined by strain analysis on the standard segmented cine. INTP<sub>TR</sub> especially negatively influenced strain rates analysis, as many strain rate curves were deemed unusable with this technique. These findings were consistent independent if the patient was in a resting, stress or anaesthetized condition. Although INTP<sub>TR</sub> is a feature which improves temporal resolution on CS cines, quantification of biventricular strain and strain rates is not feasible or comparable, thus, feature tracking analysis should be performed on non-INTP<sub>TR</sub> data. However, volumetry and ejection fraction analysis are consistent independent of which output is analysed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":"591-602"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective temporal resolution interpolation alters myocardial strain quantification on compressed sensing cine CMR.\",\"authors\":\"Leonard Grob, Yann Schwerzmann, Dario Kaiser, Bernd Jung, Thilo Schweizer, Stefan P Huettenmoser, Scilla Dozio, Adrian T Huber, Martina Boscolo Berto, Christoph Gräni, Dominik P Guensch, Kady Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10554-025-03348-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Compressed sensing (CS) is a rapidly developing technique that can acquire functional cines of the heart within seconds while free-breathing and it is ideal for assessing cardiac function in non-typical conditions such as when patients are sedated or anaesthetized or undergoing stress exams. CS cines can further include retrospective temporal resolution interpolation (INTP<sub>TR</sub>) to improve the frame count per heartbeat, and the impact of INTP<sub>TR</sub> on biventricular functional measurements is unknown. We investigated the impact of INTP<sub>TR</sub> on left and right ventricular volumetry and strain measurements of CS cines. Nineteen patients with 51 different CS acquisitions were prospectively enrolled. CS cines were acquired at rest, under adenosine stress, oxygen inhalation or while under general anaesthesia with mechanical ventilation. From the same CS acquisition, a dataset with and without INTP<sub>TR</sub> were generated by the scanner. The outputs were separated and analysed by blinded readers for left and right ventricular volumetry, as well as systolic and diastolic strain parameters using feature-tracking techniques. Measurements were compared between the INTP<sub>TR</sub> and non-INTP<sub>TR</sub> outputs. Similar measurements were obtained for biventricular volumes and ejection fraction independent of INTP<sub>TR</sub>. Peak strain was significantly underestimated on INTP<sub>TR</sub> cines for both longitudinal and circumferential orientations (p < 0.01). Nevertheless, good-to-excellent correlations were observed between the two measurements (r > 0.65, p < 0.01), and there was still a high area under the curve (AUC ≥ 0.95, p < 0.01) for detecting abnormal patients defined by strain analysis on the standard segmented cine. INTP<sub>TR</sub> especially negatively influenced strain rates analysis, as many strain rate curves were deemed unusable with this technique. These findings were consistent independent if the patient was in a resting, stress or anaesthetized condition. Although INTP<sub>TR</sub> is a feature which improves temporal resolution on CS cines, quantification of biventricular strain and strain rates is not feasible or comparable, thus, feature tracking analysis should be performed on non-INTP<sub>TR</sub> data. However, volumetry and ejection fraction analysis are consistent independent of which output is analysed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"591-602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880142/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03348-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03348-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
压缩传感(CS)是一项快速发展的技术,它可以在自由呼吸的情况下在几秒钟内获得心脏的功能曲线,是评估非典型情况下心脏功能的理想方法,例如当患者被镇静或麻醉或进行压力检查时。CS影像可以进一步包括回顾性时间分辨率插值(INTPTR),以提高每次心跳的帧数,而INTPTR对双心室功能测量的影响尚不清楚。我们研究了INTPTR对CS患者左、右心室容量和应变测量的影响。有51种不同CS获取的19例患者被前瞻性纳入研究。在静息、腺苷应激、吸氧或全身麻醉加机械通气的情况下获得CS曲线。从相同的CS采集中,扫描仪生成了包含和不包含INTPTR的数据集。通过盲读器分离和分析输出的左、右心室容量,以及使用特征跟踪技术的收缩和舒张应变参数。在INTPTR和非INTPTR输出之间比较测量结果。双心室容积和射血分数的测量结果与INTPTR无关。在纵向和周向INTPTR曲线上,峰值应变都被显著低估(p 0.65, p TR尤其对应变率分析产生负面影响,因为许多应变率曲线被认为无法用于该技术。如果患者处于休息、应激或麻醉状态,这些结果是一致的。虽然INTPTR是一种提高CS影像时间分辨率的特征,但双心室应变和应变率的量化是不可实现的,也不可比较,因此,应该对非INTPTR数据进行特征跟踪分析。然而,体积法和射血分数分析是一致的,与分析哪个输出无关。
Retrospective temporal resolution interpolation alters myocardial strain quantification on compressed sensing cine CMR.
Compressed sensing (CS) is a rapidly developing technique that can acquire functional cines of the heart within seconds while free-breathing and it is ideal for assessing cardiac function in non-typical conditions such as when patients are sedated or anaesthetized or undergoing stress exams. CS cines can further include retrospective temporal resolution interpolation (INTPTR) to improve the frame count per heartbeat, and the impact of INTPTR on biventricular functional measurements is unknown. We investigated the impact of INTPTR on left and right ventricular volumetry and strain measurements of CS cines. Nineteen patients with 51 different CS acquisitions were prospectively enrolled. CS cines were acquired at rest, under adenosine stress, oxygen inhalation or while under general anaesthesia with mechanical ventilation. From the same CS acquisition, a dataset with and without INTPTR were generated by the scanner. The outputs were separated and analysed by blinded readers for left and right ventricular volumetry, as well as systolic and diastolic strain parameters using feature-tracking techniques. Measurements were compared between the INTPTR and non-INTPTR outputs. Similar measurements were obtained for biventricular volumes and ejection fraction independent of INTPTR. Peak strain was significantly underestimated on INTPTR cines for both longitudinal and circumferential orientations (p < 0.01). Nevertheless, good-to-excellent correlations were observed between the two measurements (r > 0.65, p < 0.01), and there was still a high area under the curve (AUC ≥ 0.95, p < 0.01) for detecting abnormal patients defined by strain analysis on the standard segmented cine. INTPTR especially negatively influenced strain rates analysis, as many strain rate curves were deemed unusable with this technique. These findings were consistent independent if the patient was in a resting, stress or anaesthetized condition. Although INTPTR is a feature which improves temporal resolution on CS cines, quantification of biventricular strain and strain rates is not feasible or comparable, thus, feature tracking analysis should be performed on non-INTPTR data. However, volumetry and ejection fraction analysis are consistent independent of which output is analysed.