{"title":"抑郁症患者服用氟西汀的口服副作用:系统综述。","authors":"M-G Sarrión Pérez, Y Jiménez, L Bagan, J Bagan","doi":"10.4317/medoral.26947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are currently the preferred drugs for treating depression, a condition that has become more prevalent in recent years. Fluoxetine is one of the most widely used, but, like other antidepressants, it can cause several systemic and oral adverse effects. This systematic review aimed to analyze the frequency of oral adverse effects of fluoxetine in comparison to other antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with no date restrictions, including randomized clinical trials and observational studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for randomized trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 333 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion criteria, 31 randomized clinical trials were selected for analysis. Fluoxetine was primarily compared with tricyclic antidepressants, SSRIs, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and other antidepressants. The most frequently reported oral side effect was dry mouth, with prevalence rates ranging from 2.71% to 52.17%, though it was generally lower than with other antidepressants. Dysgeusia was less frequently reported, with only two studies documenting taste alterations. Oral side effects were primarily assessed through subjective patient reports, and no studies incorporated objective salivary flow measurements. Other adverse effects, such as nausea and vomiting, were commonly mentioned, but their potential oral consequences were not evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fluoxetine is associated with oral side effects, with dry mouth being the most frequently reported. However, data on dysgeusia remain limited, highlighting the need for further research to determine its prevalence. Given the potential impact of dry mouth on oral health and quality of life, future studies should incorporate objective salivary measurements and further investigate the clinical implications of these adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":49016,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral side effects of fluoxetine in patients with depressive disorder: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"M-G Sarrión Pérez, Y Jiménez, L Bagan, J Bagan\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/medoral.26947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are currently the preferred drugs for treating depression, a condition that has become more prevalent in recent years. Fluoxetine is one of the most widely used, but, like other antidepressants, it can cause several systemic and oral adverse effects. This systematic review aimed to analyze the frequency of oral adverse effects of fluoxetine in comparison to other antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with no date restrictions, including randomized clinical trials and observational studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for randomized trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 333 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion criteria, 31 randomized clinical trials were selected for analysis. Fluoxetine was primarily compared with tricyclic antidepressants, SSRIs, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and other antidepressants. The most frequently reported oral side effect was dry mouth, with prevalence rates ranging from 2.71% to 52.17%, though it was generally lower than with other antidepressants. Dysgeusia was less frequently reported, with only two studies documenting taste alterations. Oral side effects were primarily assessed through subjective patient reports, and no studies incorporated objective salivary flow measurements. Other adverse effects, such as nausea and vomiting, were commonly mentioned, but their potential oral consequences were not evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fluoxetine is associated with oral side effects, with dry mouth being the most frequently reported. However, data on dysgeusia remain limited, highlighting the need for further research to determine its prevalence. Given the potential impact of dry mouth on oral health and quality of life, future studies should incorporate objective salivary measurements and further investigate the clinical implications of these adverse effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.26947\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.26947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Oral side effects of fluoxetine in patients with depressive disorder: A systematic review.
Background: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are currently the preferred drugs for treating depression, a condition that has become more prevalent in recent years. Fluoxetine is one of the most widely used, but, like other antidepressants, it can cause several systemic and oral adverse effects. This systematic review aimed to analyze the frequency of oral adverse effects of fluoxetine in comparison to other antidepressants.
Material and methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with no date restrictions, including randomized clinical trials and observational studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for randomized trials.
Results: A total of 333 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion criteria, 31 randomized clinical trials were selected for analysis. Fluoxetine was primarily compared with tricyclic antidepressants, SSRIs, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and other antidepressants. The most frequently reported oral side effect was dry mouth, with prevalence rates ranging from 2.71% to 52.17%, though it was generally lower than with other antidepressants. Dysgeusia was less frequently reported, with only two studies documenting taste alterations. Oral side effects were primarily assessed through subjective patient reports, and no studies incorporated objective salivary flow measurements. Other adverse effects, such as nausea and vomiting, were commonly mentioned, but their potential oral consequences were not evaluated.
Conclusions: Fluoxetine is associated with oral side effects, with dry mouth being the most frequently reported. However, data on dysgeusia remain limited, highlighting the need for further research to determine its prevalence. Given the potential impact of dry mouth on oral health and quality of life, future studies should incorporate objective salivary measurements and further investigate the clinical implications of these adverse effects.
期刊介绍:
1. Oral Medicine and Pathology:
Clinicopathological as well as medical or surgical management aspects of
diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, as well as
orofacial neurological disorders, and systemic conditions with an impact on
the oral cavity.
2. Oral Surgery:
Surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands,
maxillary bones, teeth, implants, oral surgical procedures. Surgical management
of diseases affecting head and neck areas.
3. Medically compromised patients in Dentistry:
Articles discussing medical problems in Odontology will also be included, with
a special focus on the clinico-odontological management of medically compromised patients, and considerations regarding high-risk or disabled patients.
4. Implantology
5. Periodontology