物理治疗学生在三项触觉测验中探索时间、准确度及任务难度知觉的评估。

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION
Nataša Mlakar, Sonja Hlebš
{"title":"物理治疗学生在三项触觉测验中探索时间、准确度及任务难度知觉的评估。","authors":"Nataša Mlakar, Sonja Hlebš","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2025.2465729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Tactile sensitivity is one of the most important skills for developing competence in manual palpation. There is a lack of studies aimed at analyzing the development of tactile sensitivity during different levels of physiotherapy education. The present study aims to compare manual tactile sensitivity in two groups of physiotherapy students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty first-year physiotherapy students (mean age 19.4 yrs ± 0.6) and twenty final-year physiotherapy students (mean age 23.7 yrs ± 3.7) participated in the study. For the tactile sensitivity test, 3 wooden tables were used, in which different geometric structures were engraved. Subjects were instructed to perform a tactile examination of the geometric structures and then reproduce them by drawing on a sheet of paper. The tactile time, drawing time, accuracy, and difficulty of the geometric structures were scored. A two-sample t-test was used for the between-groups comparison if more time in an educational program should result in differences in tactile time, drawing time, accuracy, and difficulty. Linear regression was used to compare the difficulty with the accuracy of all geometric structures. Wilcoxon test was used to test the intra-rater agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of the reproduction of geometric structures 1, 2 and 3 were 77.5%, 27.5% and 45%, for all physiotherapy students respectively. Final-year physiotherapy students spent more time exploring geometric structure 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.014) and geometric structure 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.0018) compared to first-year physiotherapy students. No statistically significant differences were found between groups in drawing time, accuracy, and difficulty of geometric structures. The examiner showed a high intra-rater agreement in the assessment (over 96%).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>The study showed that the level of education and gained experience during laboratory teaching may be important in improving the palpation skills of physiotherapy students. Tactile sensitivity exercises should be included in physiotherapy education programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"365-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of exploration time, accuracy, and task difficulty perception in three tactile tests among physiotherapy students.\",\"authors\":\"Nataša Mlakar, Sonja Hlebš\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10669817.2025.2465729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Tactile sensitivity is one of the most important skills for developing competence in manual palpation. There is a lack of studies aimed at analyzing the development of tactile sensitivity during different levels of physiotherapy education. The present study aims to compare manual tactile sensitivity in two groups of physiotherapy students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty first-year physiotherapy students (mean age 19.4 yrs ± 0.6) and twenty final-year physiotherapy students (mean age 23.7 yrs ± 3.7) participated in the study. For the tactile sensitivity test, 3 wooden tables were used, in which different geometric structures were engraved. Subjects were instructed to perform a tactile examination of the geometric structures and then reproduce them by drawing on a sheet of paper. The tactile time, drawing time, accuracy, and difficulty of the geometric structures were scored. A two-sample t-test was used for the between-groups comparison if more time in an educational program should result in differences in tactile time, drawing time, accuracy, and difficulty. Linear regression was used to compare the difficulty with the accuracy of all geometric structures. Wilcoxon test was used to test the intra-rater agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of the reproduction of geometric structures 1, 2 and 3 were 77.5%, 27.5% and 45%, for all physiotherapy students respectively. Final-year physiotherapy students spent more time exploring geometric structure 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.014) and geometric structure 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.0018) compared to first-year physiotherapy students. No statistically significant differences were found between groups in drawing time, accuracy, and difficulty of geometric structures. The examiner showed a high intra-rater agreement in the assessment (over 96%).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>The study showed that the level of education and gained experience during laboratory teaching may be important in improving the palpation skills of physiotherapy students. Tactile sensitivity exercises should be included in physiotherapy education programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"365-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281665/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2025.2465729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2025.2465729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:触觉是培养手触诊能力的重要技能之一。在不同层次的物理治疗教育中,缺乏针对触觉敏感性发展的研究。本研究旨在比较两组物理治疗学生的手触觉敏感性。方法:20名一年级物理治疗专业学生(平均年龄19.4±0.6岁)和20名大四物理治疗专业学生(平均年龄23.7±3.7岁)参与研究。触觉灵敏度测试使用了3张木桌,在木桌上刻有不同的几何结构。受试者被要求对几何结构进行触觉检查,然后在一张纸上画出它们。对几何结构的触觉时间、绘制时间、准确度和难度进行评分。两样本t检验用于组间比较是否在一个教育项目中花费更多的时间会导致触觉时间、绘画时间、准确性和难度的差异。采用线性回归的方法对所有几何结构的难度与精度进行比较。采用Wilcoxon检验检验评分者内部一致性。结果:物理治疗学生对几何结构1、2、3的再现准确率分别为77.5%、27.5%和45%。与一年级物理治疗学生相比,高年级物理治疗学生花更多的时间探索几何结构2 (p = 0.014)和几何结构3 (p = 0.0018)。各组在绘制几何结构的时间、精度和难度上均无统计学差异。审查员在评估中表现出很高的内部一致性(超过96%)。讨论/结论:研究表明,教育水平和在实验教学中获得的经验可能是提高物理治疗学生触诊技能的重要因素。触觉敏感性练习应包括在物理治疗教育计划中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of exploration time, accuracy, and task difficulty perception in three tactile tests among physiotherapy students.

Objectives: Tactile sensitivity is one of the most important skills for developing competence in manual palpation. There is a lack of studies aimed at analyzing the development of tactile sensitivity during different levels of physiotherapy education. The present study aims to compare manual tactile sensitivity in two groups of physiotherapy students.

Methods: Twenty first-year physiotherapy students (mean age 19.4 yrs ± 0.6) and twenty final-year physiotherapy students (mean age 23.7 yrs ± 3.7) participated in the study. For the tactile sensitivity test, 3 wooden tables were used, in which different geometric structures were engraved. Subjects were instructed to perform a tactile examination of the geometric structures and then reproduce them by drawing on a sheet of paper. The tactile time, drawing time, accuracy, and difficulty of the geometric structures were scored. A two-sample t-test was used for the between-groups comparison if more time in an educational program should result in differences in tactile time, drawing time, accuracy, and difficulty. Linear regression was used to compare the difficulty with the accuracy of all geometric structures. Wilcoxon test was used to test the intra-rater agreement.

Results: The accuracy of the reproduction of geometric structures 1, 2 and 3 were 77.5%, 27.5% and 45%, for all physiotherapy students respectively. Final-year physiotherapy students spent more time exploring geometric structure 2 (p = 0.014) and geometric structure 3 (p = 0.0018) compared to first-year physiotherapy students. No statistically significant differences were found between groups in drawing time, accuracy, and difficulty of geometric structures. The examiner showed a high intra-rater agreement in the assessment (over 96%).

Discussion/conclusion: The study showed that the level of education and gained experience during laboratory teaching may be important in improving the palpation skills of physiotherapy students. Tactile sensitivity exercises should be included in physiotherapy education programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信