[终身创伤事件与老年轻度神经认知障碍的关系]。

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Anna Matzel, Tobias Luck, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Christoph Engel, Kerstin Wirkner, Yuriy Nesterko, Heide Glaesmer
{"title":"[终身创伤事件与老年轻度神经认知障碍的关系]。","authors":"Anna Matzel, Tobias Luck, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Christoph Engel, Kerstin Wirkner, Yuriy Nesterko, Heide Glaesmer","doi":"10.1055/a-2503-5803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The evidence on the association between lifetime traumatic events (LTE) and the occurrence of cognitive changes and dementia is heterogeneous and often based on studies in high-risk populations. Using data from a German population-based study, this study examines whether there is a connection between LTE and experiences of abuse (CA) and neglect (CN) in childhood with mild Neurocognitive Disorder (miNCD) in old age.889 participants were included in the analysis. The trauma list of the PTSD module of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SKID-I) and the Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS) were used to record LTE. miNCD was diagnosed using a neurocognitive test battery according to DSM-5 criteria. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to examine the extent to which the presence LTE is related to the presence of miNCD.In the sample 31.0% reported at least one LTE, 30.3% reported CN and 13.2% reported CA. 19.1% met the criteria for miNCD. Four models were tested, including age, gender and educational level as possible confounding variables. Model 1 examined whether LTE (yes/no) was associated with miNCD in old age. Model 2 tested whether the number of LTE was related to miNCD. Model 3 tested whether CN was related to miNCD, and model 4 tested whether CA was related to miNCD. None of the models showed a significant effect of the investigated variables on the occurrence of miNCD.International studies show indications of a correlation between TLE, CN, CA and miNCD, but there is a lack of corresponding studies in Germany. Despite methodological strengths (standardized recording of all variables, population-based study), our analysis found no correlations. Maybe study requirements led to a positive selection of healthy older people. Nevertheless, LTE, CA and CN were not underrepresented. The results contradict those in high-risk populations, but are consistent with more recent population-based studies that find no associations.In the wider population, the investigated link does not appear to be as clearly demonstrable as in populations with high traumatic burden, such as veterans, which seems reassuring news given that LTE are risk factors for numerous comorbidities that could then play a role in the development of the cognitive changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":"75 2","pages":"77-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Association of lifetime traumatic events and mild Neurocognitive Disorder in old age].\",\"authors\":\"Anna Matzel, Tobias Luck, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Christoph Engel, Kerstin Wirkner, Yuriy Nesterko, Heide Glaesmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2503-5803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The evidence on the association between lifetime traumatic events (LTE) and the occurrence of cognitive changes and dementia is heterogeneous and often based on studies in high-risk populations. Using data from a German population-based study, this study examines whether there is a connection between LTE and experiences of abuse (CA) and neglect (CN) in childhood with mild Neurocognitive Disorder (miNCD) in old age.889 participants were included in the analysis. The trauma list of the PTSD module of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SKID-I) and the Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS) were used to record LTE. miNCD was diagnosed using a neurocognitive test battery according to DSM-5 criteria. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to examine the extent to which the presence LTE is related to the presence of miNCD.In the sample 31.0% reported at least one LTE, 30.3% reported CN and 13.2% reported CA. 19.1% met the criteria for miNCD. Four models were tested, including age, gender and educational level as possible confounding variables. Model 1 examined whether LTE (yes/no) was associated with miNCD in old age. Model 2 tested whether the number of LTE was related to miNCD. Model 3 tested whether CN was related to miNCD, and model 4 tested whether CA was related to miNCD. None of the models showed a significant effect of the investigated variables on the occurrence of miNCD.International studies show indications of a correlation between TLE, CN, CA and miNCD, but there is a lack of corresponding studies in Germany. Despite methodological strengths (standardized recording of all variables, population-based study), our analysis found no correlations. Maybe study requirements led to a positive selection of healthy older people. Nevertheless, LTE, CA and CN were not underrepresented. The results contradict those in high-risk populations, but are consistent with more recent population-based studies that find no associations.In the wider population, the investigated link does not appear to be as clearly demonstrable as in populations with high traumatic burden, such as veterans, which seems reassuring news given that LTE are risk factors for numerous comorbidities that could then play a role in the development of the cognitive changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"volume\":\"75 2\",\"pages\":\"77-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2503-5803\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2503-5803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于终生创伤性事件(LTE)与认知改变和痴呆发生之间关系的证据是不同的,并且通常基于对高危人群的研究。本研究利用德国一项基于人群的研究数据,探讨了LTE与儿童时期的虐待(CA)和忽视(CN)经历与老年轻度神经认知障碍(miNCD)之间是否存在联系。889名参与者被纳入分析。使用DSM-IV结构化临床访谈PTSD模块创伤表(SKID-I)和儿童创伤筛查表(CTS)记录LTE。根据DSM-5标准使用神经认知测试组诊断miNCD。二元逻辑回归分析用于检验LTE的存在与miNCD的存在相关的程度。在样本中,31.0%报告了至少一个LTE, 30.3%报告了CN, 13.2%报告了CA。19.1%符合miNCD的标准。测试了四个模型,包括年龄、性别和教育水平作为可能的混淆变量。模型1检验LTE (yes/no)是否与老年miNCD相关。模型2检验LTE数量是否与miNCD相关。模型3检验CN是否与miNCD相关,模型4检验CA是否与miNCD相关。所有模型均未显示所调查变量对miNCD发生的显著影响。国际研究表明TLE、CN、CA和miNCD之间存在相关性,但德国缺乏相应的研究。尽管方法上有优势(所有变量的标准化记录,基于人群的研究),但我们的分析没有发现相关性。也许研究要求导致了对健康老年人的积极选择。不过,LTE、CA和CN的代表也不少。这一结果与高危人群的研究结果相矛盾,但与最近基于人群的研究结果一致。在更广泛的人群中,研究的联系似乎不像在高创伤负担人群(如退伍军人)中那样清楚地证明,这似乎是令人放心的消息,因为LTE是许多合并症的危险因素,这些合并症可能在认知变化的发展中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Association of lifetime traumatic events and mild Neurocognitive Disorder in old age].

The evidence on the association between lifetime traumatic events (LTE) and the occurrence of cognitive changes and dementia is heterogeneous and often based on studies in high-risk populations. Using data from a German population-based study, this study examines whether there is a connection between LTE and experiences of abuse (CA) and neglect (CN) in childhood with mild Neurocognitive Disorder (miNCD) in old age.889 participants were included in the analysis. The trauma list of the PTSD module of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SKID-I) and the Childhood Trauma Screener (CTS) were used to record LTE. miNCD was diagnosed using a neurocognitive test battery according to DSM-5 criteria. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to examine the extent to which the presence LTE is related to the presence of miNCD.In the sample 31.0% reported at least one LTE, 30.3% reported CN and 13.2% reported CA. 19.1% met the criteria for miNCD. Four models were tested, including age, gender and educational level as possible confounding variables. Model 1 examined whether LTE (yes/no) was associated with miNCD in old age. Model 2 tested whether the number of LTE was related to miNCD. Model 3 tested whether CN was related to miNCD, and model 4 tested whether CA was related to miNCD. None of the models showed a significant effect of the investigated variables on the occurrence of miNCD.International studies show indications of a correlation between TLE, CN, CA and miNCD, but there is a lack of corresponding studies in Germany. Despite methodological strengths (standardized recording of all variables, population-based study), our analysis found no correlations. Maybe study requirements led to a positive selection of healthy older people. Nevertheless, LTE, CA and CN were not underrepresented. The results contradict those in high-risk populations, but are consistent with more recent population-based studies that find no associations.In the wider population, the investigated link does not appear to be as clearly demonstrable as in populations with high traumatic burden, such as veterans, which seems reassuring news given that LTE are risk factors for numerous comorbidities that could then play a role in the development of the cognitive changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信