尿石症负担分析:全球、中国、印度和美国之间的差异,预测到2050年。

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Siyu Han, Shiyu Zhao, Ran Zhong, Heyang Liu, Li Liu, Yongji Yan
{"title":"尿石症负担分析:全球、中国、印度和美国之间的差异,预测到2050年。","authors":"Siyu Han, Shiyu Zhao, Ran Zhong, Heyang Liu, Li Liu, Yongji Yan","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01695-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This report analyzes the patterns of urolithiasis in China, India, the United States, and globally from 1990 to 2021 using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2021. Various techniques such as the Joinpoint model, age-period-cohort analysis, decomposition analysis, health inequities analysis, and the Bayesian age-period-cohort model were applied. According to the Joinpoint model, the average annual percent change (AAPC) for incidence, disability-adjusted life years, and mortality related to urolithiasis globally was negative. However, Indian women showed a positive AAPC of 0.20 in age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR). Both sexes in the United States showed positive AAPCs for age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR). The age-period-cohort analysis indicates that the peak ASIR occurs around ages 50-60. According to decomposition analysis, the main factors contributing to the rising burden of urolithiasis are population aging and growth, whereas changes in the disease's epidemiology slow its growth. Health inequities analysis shows increasing disparities between regions with high and low socio-demographic index (SDI). Forecasting models predict continued rise in prevalence without intervention. Overall, among the three countries, India faces the highest health burden, particularly among younger populations and women, whereas the United States experiences higher mortality rates among the elderly. Despite significant progress made by China in controlling urinary health burdens over the past three decades, the high incidence of urolithiasis and its subsequent impacts remain a concern, particularly in light of the country's demographic structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of the burden of urolithiasis: differences between the global, China, India and the United States, with projections through 2050.\",\"authors\":\"Siyu Han, Shiyu Zhao, Ran Zhong, Heyang Liu, Li Liu, Yongji Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00240-025-01695-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This report analyzes the patterns of urolithiasis in China, India, the United States, and globally from 1990 to 2021 using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2021. Various techniques such as the Joinpoint model, age-period-cohort analysis, decomposition analysis, health inequities analysis, and the Bayesian age-period-cohort model were applied. According to the Joinpoint model, the average annual percent change (AAPC) for incidence, disability-adjusted life years, and mortality related to urolithiasis globally was negative. However, Indian women showed a positive AAPC of 0.20 in age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR). Both sexes in the United States showed positive AAPCs for age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR). The age-period-cohort analysis indicates that the peak ASIR occurs around ages 50-60. According to decomposition analysis, the main factors contributing to the rising burden of urolithiasis are population aging and growth, whereas changes in the disease's epidemiology slow its growth. Health inequities analysis shows increasing disparities between regions with high and low socio-demographic index (SDI). Forecasting models predict continued rise in prevalence without intervention. Overall, among the three countries, India faces the highest health burden, particularly among younger populations and women, whereas the United States experiences higher mortality rates among the elderly. Despite significant progress made by China in controlling urinary health burdens over the past three decades, the high incidence of urolithiasis and its subsequent impacts remain a concern, particularly in light of the country's demographic structure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01695-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01695-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本报告使用全球疾病负担研究(GBD) 2021的数据,分析了1990年至2021年中国、印度、美国和全球尿石症的模式。应用了各种技术,如Joinpoint模型、年龄-时期-队列分析、分解分析、健康不公平分析和贝叶斯年龄-时期-队列模型。根据Joinpoint模型,全球范围内与尿石症相关的发病率、残疾调整生命年和死亡率的平均年百分比变化(AAPC)为负。然而,印度妇女在年龄标准化发病率(ASIR)中显示0.20的AAPC阳性。美国男女在年龄标准化死亡率(ASMR)方面的AAPCs均呈阳性。年龄-时期-队列分析表明,ASIR高峰发生在50-60岁左右。根据分解分析,导致尿石症负担增加的主要因素是人口老龄化和人口增长,而疾病流行病学的变化减缓了其增长。卫生不公平分析表明,社会人口指数高和低的地区之间的差距越来越大。预测模型预测,如果不采取干预措施,患病率将继续上升。总体而言,在这三个国家中,印度面临的健康负担最重,特别是在年轻人和妇女中,而美国的老年人死亡率更高。尽管过去三十年来中国在控制泌尿健康负担方面取得了重大进展,但尿石症的高发及其后续影响仍然令人担忧,特别是考虑到中国的人口结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An analysis of the burden of urolithiasis: differences between the global, China, India and the United States, with projections through 2050.

This report analyzes the patterns of urolithiasis in China, India, the United States, and globally from 1990 to 2021 using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2021. Various techniques such as the Joinpoint model, age-period-cohort analysis, decomposition analysis, health inequities analysis, and the Bayesian age-period-cohort model were applied. According to the Joinpoint model, the average annual percent change (AAPC) for incidence, disability-adjusted life years, and mortality related to urolithiasis globally was negative. However, Indian women showed a positive AAPC of 0.20 in age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR). Both sexes in the United States showed positive AAPCs for age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR). The age-period-cohort analysis indicates that the peak ASIR occurs around ages 50-60. According to decomposition analysis, the main factors contributing to the rising burden of urolithiasis are population aging and growth, whereas changes in the disease's epidemiology slow its growth. Health inequities analysis shows increasing disparities between regions with high and low socio-demographic index (SDI). Forecasting models predict continued rise in prevalence without intervention. Overall, among the three countries, India faces the highest health burden, particularly among younger populations and women, whereas the United States experiences higher mortality rates among the elderly. Despite significant progress made by China in controlling urinary health burdens over the past three decades, the high incidence of urolithiasis and its subsequent impacts remain a concern, particularly in light of the country's demographic structure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信