IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sarah M Tweddell, Thomas M Morelli, Timothy M Bahr, Ashley Krueger, Robert D Christensen, Robin K Ohls
{"title":"Identifying barriers to complying with new restrictive NICU transfusion guidelines.","authors":"Sarah M Tweddell, Thomas M Morelli, Timothy M Bahr, Ashley Krueger, Robert D Christensen, Robin K Ohls","doi":"10.1038/s41372-025-02225-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our NICU transfusion stewardship group proposed new, more restrictive guidelines for red blood cell and platelet transfusions. To evaluate our clinician's support for these, we conducted a series of structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We presented 11 scenarios involving the new guidelines to each of 24 clinicians. After every scenario we asked whether they would abide by the guideline, and if not, why.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 88% of scenarios, participants said they supported the guideline and would not transfuse. The most common reasons for wanting to transfuse when the guidelines said not to were; 1) the scenario-patient did not meet the guideline but was \"close\" and 2) the guideline was insufficiently explicit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Structured interviews like these can identify barriers to complying with transfusion guidelines and can suggest guideline modifications. Future studies will determine the effect of this discovery process on guideline adherence and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02225-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的新生儿重症监护室输血管理小组提出了新的、限制性更强的红细胞和血小板输注指南。为了评估临床医生对新指南的支持程度,我们进行了一系列结构化访谈:研究设计:我们向 24 名临床医生分别介绍了 11 种涉及新指南的情景。研究设计:我们向 24 名临床医生分别展示了 11 个涉及新指南的情景,每个情景结束后,我们都会询问他们是否会遵守指南,如果不会,原因是什么:在 88% 的情景中,参与者表示支持指南,不会输血。在指南规定不输血的情况下仍想输血的最常见原因是:1)情景患者不符合指南要求,但 "接近";2)指南不够明确:像这样的结构化访谈可以找出遵守输血指南的障碍,并提出修改指南的建议。未来的研究将确定这一发现过程对指南遵守情况和患者预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying barriers to complying with new restrictive NICU transfusion guidelines.

Objectives: Our NICU transfusion stewardship group proposed new, more restrictive guidelines for red blood cell and platelet transfusions. To evaluate our clinician's support for these, we conducted a series of structured interviews.

Study design: We presented 11 scenarios involving the new guidelines to each of 24 clinicians. After every scenario we asked whether they would abide by the guideline, and if not, why.

Results: For 88% of scenarios, participants said they supported the guideline and would not transfuse. The most common reasons for wanting to transfuse when the guidelines said not to were; 1) the scenario-patient did not meet the guideline but was "close" and 2) the guideline was insufficiently explicit.

Conclusions: Structured interviews like these can identify barriers to complying with transfusion guidelines and can suggest guideline modifications. Future studies will determine the effect of this discovery process on guideline adherence and patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatology
Journal of Perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatology provides members of the perinatal/neonatal healthcare team with original information pertinent to improving maternal/fetal and neonatal care. We publish peer-reviewed clinical research articles, state-of-the art reviews, comments, quality improvement reports, and letters to the editor. Articles published in the Journal of Perinatology embrace the full scope of the specialty, including clinical, professional, political, administrative and educational aspects. The Journal also explores legal and ethical issues, neonatal technology and product development. The Journal’s audience includes all those that participate in perinatal/neonatal care, including, but not limited to neonatologists, perinatologists, perinatal epidemiologists, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, surgeons, neonatal and perinatal nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dieticians, speech and hearing experts, other allied health professionals, as well as subspecialists who participate in patient care including radiologists, laboratory medicine and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信