{"title":"肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂、钙通道阻滞剂和利尿剂对高血压合并糖尿病患者的疗效:基于蛋白尿的亚组分析,一项系统评价和荟萃分析。","authors":"Daisuke Ichikawa, Wakako Kawarazaki, Sanae Saka, Tomohiko Kanaoka, Hirofumi Ohnishi, Hisatomi Arima, Shigeru Shibata","doi":"10.1038/s41440-025-02146-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In hypertensive patients with diabetes, the effectiveness of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in improving mortality, cardiovascular events, and renal outcomes, compared to other antihypertensive drugs such as calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and diuretics, remains uncertain, particularly in the context of albuminuria. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Japan Medical Abstracts Society databases up to October 2024. A meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials, including 14,163 patients, was performed. RAS inhibitors showed no significant advantage over CCBs or diuretics for all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-1.08, p = 0.98), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.32-1.31, p = 0.22), stroke (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.00-1.31, p = 0.05), composite cardiovascular events (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.81-1.07, p = 0.45), or end-stage renal disease (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72-1.08, p = 0.21). Subgroup analyses stratified by albuminuria status revealed no significant benefits of RAS inhibitors, regardless of albuminuria presence. The findings emphasize the need for cautious interpretation due to limited sample sizes, wide confidence intervals, and low precision. These results highlight the importance of considering not only RAS inhibitors but also other antihypertensive drugs as the first-line choice for blood pressure control in diabetic patients, with careful attention to side effects and other relevant factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":13029,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics in hypertensive patients with diabetes: subgroup analysis based on albuminuria in a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Ichikawa, Wakako Kawarazaki, Sanae Saka, Tomohiko Kanaoka, Hirofumi Ohnishi, Hisatomi Arima, Shigeru Shibata\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41440-025-02146-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In hypertensive patients with diabetes, the effectiveness of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in improving mortality, cardiovascular events, and renal outcomes, compared to other antihypertensive drugs such as calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and diuretics, remains uncertain, particularly in the context of albuminuria. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Japan Medical Abstracts Society databases up to October 2024. A meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials, including 14,163 patients, was performed. RAS inhibitors showed no significant advantage over CCBs or diuretics for all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-1.08, p = 0.98), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.32-1.31, p = 0.22), stroke (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.00-1.31, p = 0.05), composite cardiovascular events (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.81-1.07, p = 0.45), or end-stage renal disease (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72-1.08, p = 0.21). Subgroup analyses stratified by albuminuria status revealed no significant benefits of RAS inhibitors, regardless of albuminuria presence. The findings emphasize the need for cautious interpretation due to limited sample sizes, wide confidence intervals, and low precision. These results highlight the importance of considering not only RAS inhibitors but also other antihypertensive drugs as the first-line choice for blood pressure control in diabetic patients, with careful attention to side effects and other relevant factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-025-02146-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-025-02146-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在高血压合并糖尿病患者中,与钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)和利尿剂等其他降压药物相比,肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)抑制剂在改善死亡率、心血管事件和肾脏预后方面的有效性仍不确定,特别是在蛋白尿的情况下。使用PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和日本医学文摘协会数据库进行了全面的文献检索,截止到2024年10月。对包括14163例患者在内的12项随机对照试验进行meta分析。在全因死亡率(相对危险度[RR]: 1.00, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.92-1.08, p = 0.98)、心肌梗死(RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.32-1.31, p = 0.22)、中风(RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.00-1.31, p = 0.05)、复合心血管事件(RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.81-1.07, p = 0.45)或终末期肾病(RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72-1.08, p = 0.21)方面,RAS抑制剂与CCBs或利尿剂相比没有显著优势。根据蛋白尿状态分层的亚组分析显示,无论是否存在蛋白尿,RAS抑制剂都没有显著的益处。研究结果强调,由于样本量有限,置信区间宽,精度低,需要谨慎解释。这些结果强调了不仅要考虑RAS抑制剂,还要考虑其他降压药物作为糖尿病患者血压控制的一线选择,同时要注意副作用和其他相关因素。
Efficacy of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics in hypertensive patients with diabetes: subgroup analysis based on albuminuria in a systematic review and meta-analysis.
In hypertensive patients with diabetes, the effectiveness of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in improving mortality, cardiovascular events, and renal outcomes, compared to other antihypertensive drugs such as calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and diuretics, remains uncertain, particularly in the context of albuminuria. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Japan Medical Abstracts Society databases up to October 2024. A meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials, including 14,163 patients, was performed. RAS inhibitors showed no significant advantage over CCBs or diuretics for all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-1.08, p = 0.98), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.32-1.31, p = 0.22), stroke (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.00-1.31, p = 0.05), composite cardiovascular events (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.81-1.07, p = 0.45), or end-stage renal disease (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72-1.08, p = 0.21). Subgroup analyses stratified by albuminuria status revealed no significant benefits of RAS inhibitors, regardless of albuminuria presence. The findings emphasize the need for cautious interpretation due to limited sample sizes, wide confidence intervals, and low precision. These results highlight the importance of considering not only RAS inhibitors but also other antihypertensive drugs as the first-line choice for blood pressure control in diabetic patients, with careful attention to side effects and other relevant factors.
期刊介绍:
Hypertension Research is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. The journal publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. The journal publishes Review Articles, Articles, Correspondence and Comments.