通过右小开胸联合二尖瓣和主动脉瓣手术:单中心经验。

IF 1.6 Q2 SURGERY
Mariafrancesca Fiorentino, Elisa Mikus, Alberto Tripodi, Diego Sangiorgi, Simone Calvi, Elena Tenti, Antonino Costantino, Carlo Savini
{"title":"通过右小开胸联合二尖瓣和主动脉瓣手术:单中心经验。","authors":"Mariafrancesca Fiorentino, Elisa Mikus, Alberto Tripodi, Diego Sangiorgi, Simone Calvi, Elena Tenti, Antonino Costantino, Carlo Savini","doi":"10.1177/15569845251314025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimally invasive combined mitral and aortic valve surgery is still uncommon. We report our experience performing multiple valve procedures through a right-sided minithoracotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present an observational case series with a retrospective analysis of 38 patients who underwent double valve surgery through right anterior thoracotomy from November 2013 to November 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of our population was 72 years, and 61% were female patients. The median EuroSCORE II was 2.27. Three patients (7.9%) had redo operations. The median cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp times were 98 and 85 min, respectively. No conversion to full sternotomy was necessary. In-hospital mortality was 2.6% (1 patient); the patient died of septic shock and consequent multiorgan failure. Of the patients, 53% required transfusions with packed blood cells. Postoperative atrial fibrillation was observed in 12 patients (32%), and 2 patients (5.2%) required pacemaker implantation due to third-degree atrioventricular block. Also, 1 stroke (2.6%) and 1 rethoracotomy for bleeding were observed. The median ventilation time was 10 h. The median intensive care unit and postoperative length of stay were 2 days and 7.5 days, respectively. Survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 93.8%, 86.3%, 86.3%, and 77.2%, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 6.5 years. Freedom from reintervention at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 96.8%, 89.5%, 85.0%, and 69.5%, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 5.7 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our experience, a minimally invasive approach for combined aortic and mitral valve surgery is safe and feasible, with acceptable CPB and cross-clamp times and good outcomes. Therefore, it can be an attractive option for patients with double valve diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":13574,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"73-79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined Mitral and Aortic Valve Surgery Through a Right Minithoracotomy: A Single-Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Mariafrancesca Fiorentino, Elisa Mikus, Alberto Tripodi, Diego Sangiorgi, Simone Calvi, Elena Tenti, Antonino Costantino, Carlo Savini\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15569845251314025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimally invasive combined mitral and aortic valve surgery is still uncommon. We report our experience performing multiple valve procedures through a right-sided minithoracotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present an observational case series with a retrospective analysis of 38 patients who underwent double valve surgery through right anterior thoracotomy from November 2013 to November 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of our population was 72 years, and 61% were female patients. The median EuroSCORE II was 2.27. Three patients (7.9%) had redo operations. The median cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp times were 98 and 85 min, respectively. No conversion to full sternotomy was necessary. In-hospital mortality was 2.6% (1 patient); the patient died of septic shock and consequent multiorgan failure. Of the patients, 53% required transfusions with packed blood cells. Postoperative atrial fibrillation was observed in 12 patients (32%), and 2 patients (5.2%) required pacemaker implantation due to third-degree atrioventricular block. Also, 1 stroke (2.6%) and 1 rethoracotomy for bleeding were observed. The median ventilation time was 10 h. The median intensive care unit and postoperative length of stay were 2 days and 7.5 days, respectively. Survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 93.8%, 86.3%, 86.3%, and 77.2%, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 6.5 years. Freedom from reintervention at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 96.8%, 89.5%, 85.0%, and 69.5%, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 5.7 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our experience, a minimally invasive approach for combined aortic and mitral valve surgery is safe and feasible, with acceptable CPB and cross-clamp times and good outcomes. Therefore, it can be an attractive option for patients with double valve diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"73-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15569845251314025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15569845251314025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:微创二尖瓣和主动脉瓣联合手术仍不常见。我们报告我们通过右侧小开胸进行多瓣膜手术的经验。方法:回顾性分析2013年11月至2023年11月行右前开胸双瓣手术的38例观察性病例。结果:本组患者年龄中位数为72岁,女性占61%。EuroSCORE II的中位数为2.27。3例(7.9%)行重手术。中位体外循环(CPB)时间为98 min,交叉钳夹时间为85 min。无需转换为完全胸骨切开术。住院死亡率为2.6%(1例);患者死于感染性休克和随后的多器官衰竭。在这些患者中,53%的人需要输血填充血细胞。术后12例(32%)患者出现房颤,2例(5.2%)患者因三度房室传导阻滞需要植入起搏器。此外,还观察到1例卒中(2.6%)和1例因出血而开胸手术。中位通气时间为10 h,重症监护病房和术后住院时间中位分别为2天和7.5天。1年、3年、5年和10年生存率分别为93.8%、86.3%、86.3%和77.2%,中位随访时间为6.5年。1年、3年、5年和10年的再干预自由度分别为96.8%、89.5%、85.0%和69.5%,中位随访时间为5.7年。结论:根据我们的经验,微创主动脉二尖瓣联合手术是安全可行的,CPB和交叉夹夹时间可接受,效果良好。因此,它可以是一个有吸引力的选择患者双瓣疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined Mitral and Aortic Valve Surgery Through a Right Minithoracotomy: A Single-Center Experience.

Objective: Minimally invasive combined mitral and aortic valve surgery is still uncommon. We report our experience performing multiple valve procedures through a right-sided minithoracotomy.

Methods: We present an observational case series with a retrospective analysis of 38 patients who underwent double valve surgery through right anterior thoracotomy from November 2013 to November 2023.

Results: The median age of our population was 72 years, and 61% were female patients. The median EuroSCORE II was 2.27. Three patients (7.9%) had redo operations. The median cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp times were 98 and 85 min, respectively. No conversion to full sternotomy was necessary. In-hospital mortality was 2.6% (1 patient); the patient died of septic shock and consequent multiorgan failure. Of the patients, 53% required transfusions with packed blood cells. Postoperative atrial fibrillation was observed in 12 patients (32%), and 2 patients (5.2%) required pacemaker implantation due to third-degree atrioventricular block. Also, 1 stroke (2.6%) and 1 rethoracotomy for bleeding were observed. The median ventilation time was 10 h. The median intensive care unit and postoperative length of stay were 2 days and 7.5 days, respectively. Survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 93.8%, 86.3%, 86.3%, and 77.2%, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 6.5 years. Freedom from reintervention at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 96.8%, 89.5%, 85.0%, and 69.5%, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 5.7 years.

Conclusions: In our experience, a minimally invasive approach for combined aortic and mitral valve surgery is safe and feasible, with acceptable CPB and cross-clamp times and good outcomes. Therefore, it can be an attractive option for patients with double valve diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery is the first journal whose main mission is to disseminate information specifically about advances in technology and techniques that lead to less invasive treatment of cardiothoracic and vascular disease. It delivers cutting edge original research, reviews, essays, case reports, and editorials from the pioneers and experts in the field of minimally invasive cardiothoracic and vascular disease, including biomedical engineers. Also included are papers presented at the annual ISMICS meeting. Official Journal of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信