国家《长期护理机构环境卫生条例》审查。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ruwan Dissanayake, Emily E Johnson, Mary E Leong, Angela M Fraser
{"title":"国家《长期护理机构环境卫生条例》审查。","authors":"Ruwan Dissanayake, Emily E Johnson, Mary E Leong, Angela M Fraser","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We examined how state regulations for long-term care facilities address environmental sanitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>State regulations for nursing homes and assisted living facilities across all 50 US states and the District of Columbia were sourced from government Web sites. We searched using key terms about environmental sanitation and then quantified our findings to answer 4 questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More states required infection preventionists in nursing homes (29 states) than in assisted living facilities (14 states). References for environmental service workers appeared more frequently in nursing home regulations (22 states) than in assisted living regulations (6 states). Infection control training was required more often in nursing homes (32 states) than in assisted living facilities (27 states). Gloves were the most common personal protective equipment cited, addressed in 14 state nursing home regulations and 13 state-level assisted living regulations. Only 7 state nursing home regulations and 2 assisted living regulations addressed carpet, with only 6 addressing high-touch items.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State regulations inadequately address environmental service workers, staff training, carpets, and high-touch items. These regulatory gaps could pose significant risks to long-term care residents if infection control policies and procedures rely solely on regulatory requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of state regulations related to environmental sanitation in long-term care facilities.\",\"authors\":\"Ruwan Dissanayake, Emily E Johnson, Mary E Leong, Angela M Fraser\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.02.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We examined how state regulations for long-term care facilities address environmental sanitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>State regulations for nursing homes and assisted living facilities across all 50 US states and the District of Columbia were sourced from government Web sites. We searched using key terms about environmental sanitation and then quantified our findings to answer 4 questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More states required infection preventionists in nursing homes (29 states) than in assisted living facilities (14 states). References for environmental service workers appeared more frequently in nursing home regulations (22 states) than in assisted living regulations (6 states). Infection control training was required more often in nursing homes (32 states) than in assisted living facilities (27 states). Gloves were the most common personal protective equipment cited, addressed in 14 state nursing home regulations and 13 state-level assisted living regulations. Only 7 state nursing home regulations and 2 assisted living regulations addressed carpet, with only 6 addressing high-touch items.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State regulations inadequately address environmental service workers, staff training, carpets, and high-touch items. These regulatory gaps could pose significant risks to long-term care residents if infection control policies and procedures rely solely on regulatory requirements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.02.006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.02.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们研究了长期护理设施的国家法规如何解决环境卫生问题。方法:美国所有50个州和哥伦比亚特区的养老院和辅助生活设施的州法规来自政府网站。我们使用有关环境卫生的关键术语进行搜索,然后量化我们的发现,以回答四个问题。结果:更多的州需要在养老院(29个州)感染预防比在辅助生活设施(14个州)。在养老院法规(22个州)中对环境服务工作者的引用比在辅助生活法规(6个州)中出现的频率更高。疗养院(32个州)比辅助生活设施(27个州)更需要感染控制培训。手套是最常见的个人防护装备,在14个州的养老院法规和13个州的辅助生活法规中都有提及。只有7个州的养老院条例和2个辅助生活条例涉及地毯,只有6个涉及高触感物品。结论:国家法规没有充分解决环境服务工人、员工培训、地毯和高接触物品的问题。如果感染控制政策和程序仅仅依赖于监管要求,这些监管缺口可能对长期护理居民构成重大风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of state regulations related to environmental sanitation in long-term care facilities.

Background: We examined how state regulations for long-term care facilities address environmental sanitation.

Methods: State regulations for nursing homes and assisted living facilities across all 50 US states and the District of Columbia were sourced from government Web sites. We searched using key terms about environmental sanitation and then quantified our findings to answer 4 questions.

Results: More states required infection preventionists in nursing homes (29 states) than in assisted living facilities (14 states). References for environmental service workers appeared more frequently in nursing home regulations (22 states) than in assisted living regulations (6 states). Infection control training was required more often in nursing homes (32 states) than in assisted living facilities (27 states). Gloves were the most common personal protective equipment cited, addressed in 14 state nursing home regulations and 13 state-level assisted living regulations. Only 7 state nursing home regulations and 2 assisted living regulations addressed carpet, with only 6 addressing high-touch items.

Conclusions: State regulations inadequately address environmental service workers, staff training, carpets, and high-touch items. These regulatory gaps could pose significant risks to long-term care residents if infection control policies and procedures rely solely on regulatory requirements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信