手工艺干预对心理健康和福祉的影响:一项系统综述

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Elise Bromann Bukhave, Jennifer Creek, Anne Kirketerp Linstad, Tove Faber Frandsen
{"title":"手工艺干预对心理健康和福祉的影响:一项系统综述","authors":"Elise Bromann Bukhave,&nbsp;Jennifer Creek,&nbsp;Anne Kirketerp Linstad,&nbsp;Tove Faber Frandsen","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>A recent upsurge of interest in the health benefits of crafts for mental health and well-being has not been supported by systematic reviews of the effectiveness of crafts-based interventions, prior to this review.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Five databases were searched: Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCO), APA PsycInfo (EBSCO), Eric (EBSCO), and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. No date limitations were applied. The search was carried out in January 2024 and supplemented by citation searches in June 2024.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The initial search yielded 14,115 papers; the citation search produced 226 additional references. Nineteen studies in total met the inclusion criteria.</p>\n \n <p>Across the 19 studies, there is a wide variety of research designs and a range of crafts used as media for therapy. Interventions were delivered or supervised by either art therapists, nurses, or occupational therapists. Only nine studies report the theoretical basis for the intervention. Treatment duration varies from 10 min to 16 weeks.</p>\n \n <p>Quality assessment revealed the quality of the studies varies considerably, with some studies of high-quality and many suffering from methodological weaknesses. Common issues relating to risk of bias include failure to blind assessors; incomplete data and lack of clarity about how the intervention was administered.</p>\n \n <p>All the studies report short-term improvements in the outcomes measured, which include anxiety, stress, depression, interest in life, self-efficacy, social skills, sociability, mood, well-being, self-esteem, life satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and hopelessness.</p>\n \n <p>Due to the wide variation in interventions, research designs, outcomes, outcome measures, and research quality, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of crafts-based interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There is some evidence that crafts-based interventions may benefit mental health and well-being, but more high-quality research is needed, including on the mechanisms through which crafts-based interventions operate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Consumer and community involvement</h3>\n \n <p>No consumer or community involvement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\n \n <p>Reports from the media suggest that doing crafts may improve mental health. Crafts are, for example, knitting, sewing, and pottery. Therapists have used crafts for years to treat mental illnesses. However, there is no strong proof that these treatments are effective for clients or worth the cost.</p>\n \n <p>This paper reviews the effects of craft-based treatments. The review found 19 studies that looked at whether people felt better after doing crafts. The participants included men and women with various physical, mental, and social problems. These issues included mental disorders, osteoarthritis, epilepsy, and dementia. Pottery, embroidery, knitting, papercraft, and woodwork were used. Some people did crafts for 10 min, while others had several sessions over weeks.</p>\n \n <p>All 19 studies showed that mood and life satisfaction improved after the treatment. But, only one study checked if these improvements lasted in the weeks after.</p>\n \n <p>It is encouraging to see that people feel better after doing crafts. But, these 19 studies together do not prove that the benefits last long-term. More research is needed to get clearer answers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of crafts-based interventions on mental health and well-being: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Elise Bromann Bukhave,&nbsp;Jennifer Creek,&nbsp;Anne Kirketerp Linstad,&nbsp;Tove Faber Frandsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1440-1630.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>A recent upsurge of interest in the health benefits of crafts for mental health and well-being has not been supported by systematic reviews of the effectiveness of crafts-based interventions, prior to this review.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Five databases were searched: Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCO), APA PsycInfo (EBSCO), Eric (EBSCO), and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. No date limitations were applied. The search was carried out in January 2024 and supplemented by citation searches in June 2024.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The initial search yielded 14,115 papers; the citation search produced 226 additional references. Nineteen studies in total met the inclusion criteria.</p>\\n \\n <p>Across the 19 studies, there is a wide variety of research designs and a range of crafts used as media for therapy. Interventions were delivered or supervised by either art therapists, nurses, or occupational therapists. Only nine studies report the theoretical basis for the intervention. Treatment duration varies from 10 min to 16 weeks.</p>\\n \\n <p>Quality assessment revealed the quality of the studies varies considerably, with some studies of high-quality and many suffering from methodological weaknesses. Common issues relating to risk of bias include failure to blind assessors; incomplete data and lack of clarity about how the intervention was administered.</p>\\n \\n <p>All the studies report short-term improvements in the outcomes measured, which include anxiety, stress, depression, interest in life, self-efficacy, social skills, sociability, mood, well-being, self-esteem, life satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and hopelessness.</p>\\n \\n <p>Due to the wide variation in interventions, research designs, outcomes, outcome measures, and research quality, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of crafts-based interventions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is some evidence that crafts-based interventions may benefit mental health and well-being, but more high-quality research is needed, including on the mechanisms through which crafts-based interventions operate.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Consumer and community involvement</h3>\\n \\n <p>No consumer or community involvement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\\n \\n <p>Reports from the media suggest that doing crafts may improve mental health. Crafts are, for example, knitting, sewing, and pottery. Therapists have used crafts for years to treat mental illnesses. However, there is no strong proof that these treatments are effective for clients or worth the cost.</p>\\n \\n <p>This paper reviews the effects of craft-based treatments. The review found 19 studies that looked at whether people felt better after doing crafts. The participants included men and women with various physical, mental, and social problems. These issues included mental disorders, osteoarthritis, epilepsy, and dementia. Pottery, embroidery, knitting, papercraft, and woodwork were used. Some people did crafts for 10 min, while others had several sessions over weeks.</p>\\n \\n <p>All 19 studies showed that mood and life satisfaction improved after the treatment. But, only one study checked if these improvements lasted in the weeks after.</p>\\n \\n <p>It is encouraging to see that people feel better after doing crafts. But, these 19 studies together do not prove that the benefits last long-term. More research is needed to get clearer answers.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.70001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.70001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近对手工艺对心理健康和福祉的健康益处的兴趣高涨,但在本综述之前,对基于手工艺的干预措施有效性的系统综述并未支持这一观点。方法检索Scopus、CINAHL (EBSCO)、APA PsycInfo (EBSCO)、Eric (EBSCO)和ProQuest disserds and Theses 5个数据库。没有日期限制。检索于2024年1月进行,并于2024年6月补充了引文检索。结果初步检索到14115篇论文;引文搜索产生了226个额外的参考文献。总共有19项研究符合纳入标准。在这19项研究中,有各种各样的研究设计和一系列的工艺被用作治疗的媒介。干预措施由艺术治疗师、护士或职业治疗师提供或监督。只有9项研究报告了干预的理论基础。治疗时间从10分钟到16周不等。质量评估显示,研究的质量参差不齐,有些研究质量高,而许多研究在方法上存在缺陷。与偏倚风险相关的常见问题包括没有盲评者;关于如何实施干预的数据不完整和缺乏明确性。所有的研究都报告了测量结果的短期改善,包括焦虑、压力、抑郁、对生活的兴趣、自我效能、社交技能、社交能力、情绪、幸福感、自尊、生活满意度、与健康相关的生活质量和绝望。由于干预措施、研究设计、结果、结果测量和研究质量的差异很大,很难对基于工艺的干预措施的有效性得出明确的结论。有一些证据表明,基于手工艺的干预措施可能有益于心理健康和福祉,但需要更多高质量的研究,包括基于手工艺的干预措施的运作机制。消费者和社区参与没有消费者或社区参与。媒体报道称,做手工可以改善心理健康。手工艺品,例如,编织,缝纫和陶器。治疗师多年来一直使用工艺品来治疗精神疾病。然而,没有强有力的证据表明这些治疗方法对客户有效或物有所值。本文综述了工艺处理的效果。该综述发现了19项研究,这些研究着眼于人们在做手工后是否感觉更好。参与者包括有各种身体、精神和社会问题的男性和女性。这些问题包括精神障碍、骨关节炎、癫痫和痴呆。陶器、刺绣、编织、纸工艺和木制品都被使用。有些人只做10分钟的手工,而另一些人则在几周内做了几次。所有19项研究都表明,治疗后情绪和生活满意度有所改善。但是,只有一项研究检查了这些改善是否在几周后持续。看到人们在做手工后感觉好多了,真是令人鼓舞。但是,这19项研究加在一起并不能证明这些好处能长期持续。需要更多的研究来得到更清晰的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effects of crafts-based interventions on mental health and well-being: A systematic review

The effects of crafts-based interventions on mental health and well-being: A systematic review

Introduction

A recent upsurge of interest in the health benefits of crafts for mental health and well-being has not been supported by systematic reviews of the effectiveness of crafts-based interventions, prior to this review.

Methods

Five databases were searched: Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCO), APA PsycInfo (EBSCO), Eric (EBSCO), and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. No date limitations were applied. The search was carried out in January 2024 and supplemented by citation searches in June 2024.

Results

The initial search yielded 14,115 papers; the citation search produced 226 additional references. Nineteen studies in total met the inclusion criteria.

Across the 19 studies, there is a wide variety of research designs and a range of crafts used as media for therapy. Interventions were delivered or supervised by either art therapists, nurses, or occupational therapists. Only nine studies report the theoretical basis for the intervention. Treatment duration varies from 10 min to 16 weeks.

Quality assessment revealed the quality of the studies varies considerably, with some studies of high-quality and many suffering from methodological weaknesses. Common issues relating to risk of bias include failure to blind assessors; incomplete data and lack of clarity about how the intervention was administered.

All the studies report short-term improvements in the outcomes measured, which include anxiety, stress, depression, interest in life, self-efficacy, social skills, sociability, mood, well-being, self-esteem, life satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and hopelessness.

Due to the wide variation in interventions, research designs, outcomes, outcome measures, and research quality, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of crafts-based interventions.

Conclusion

There is some evidence that crafts-based interventions may benefit mental health and well-being, but more high-quality research is needed, including on the mechanisms through which crafts-based interventions operate.

Consumer and community involvement

No consumer or community involvement.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Reports from the media suggest that doing crafts may improve mental health. Crafts are, for example, knitting, sewing, and pottery. Therapists have used crafts for years to treat mental illnesses. However, there is no strong proof that these treatments are effective for clients or worth the cost.

This paper reviews the effects of craft-based treatments. The review found 19 studies that looked at whether people felt better after doing crafts. The participants included men and women with various physical, mental, and social problems. These issues included mental disorders, osteoarthritis, epilepsy, and dementia. Pottery, embroidery, knitting, papercraft, and woodwork were used. Some people did crafts for 10 min, while others had several sessions over weeks.

All 19 studies showed that mood and life satisfaction improved after the treatment. But, only one study checked if these improvements lasted in the weeks after.

It is encouraging to see that people feel better after doing crafts. But, these 19 studies together do not prove that the benefits last long-term. More research is needed to get clearer answers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信