在混合形式评估中有针对性和随机双重评分对心理测量学的影响

IF 2.7 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yangmeng Xu, Stefanie A. Wind
{"title":"在混合形式评估中有针对性和随机双重评分对心理测量学的影响","authors":"Yangmeng Xu,&nbsp;Stefanie A. Wind","doi":"10.1111/emip.12636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Double-scoring constructed-response items is a common but costly practice in mixed-format assessments. This study explored the impacts of Targeted Double-Scoring (TDS) and random double-scoring procedures on the quality of psychometric outcomes, including student achievement estimates, person fit, and student classifications under various conditions that reflect operational performance assessments. Using a simulation study, our results suggest no notable advantages for TDS over the random double-scoring approach across various psychometric outcomes, regardless of conditions related to student misfit, rater misfit, and rater severity. This study holds significant implications for mixed-format assessments, offering insights into a comprehensive evaluation of double-scoring methods. We recommend that researchers consider these findings when considering among double-scoring procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47345,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","volume":"44 1","pages":"18-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Psychometric Impact of Targeted and Random Double-Scoring in Mixed-Format Assessments\",\"authors\":\"Yangmeng Xu,&nbsp;Stefanie A. Wind\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emip.12636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Double-scoring constructed-response items is a common but costly practice in mixed-format assessments. This study explored the impacts of Targeted Double-Scoring (TDS) and random double-scoring procedures on the quality of psychometric outcomes, including student achievement estimates, person fit, and student classifications under various conditions that reflect operational performance assessments. Using a simulation study, our results suggest no notable advantages for TDS over the random double-scoring approach across various psychometric outcomes, regardless of conditions related to student misfit, rater misfit, and rater severity. This study holds significant implications for mixed-format assessments, offering insights into a comprehensive evaluation of double-scoring methods. We recommend that researchers consider these findings when considering among double-scoring procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"18-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12636\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在混合形式的评估中,双重评分的构造反应项目是一种常见但代价高昂的做法。本研究探讨了目标双重评分(TDS)和随机双重评分程序对心理测量结果质量的影响,包括学生成绩估计、个人适合度和反映操作绩效评估的各种条件下的学生分类。通过模拟研究,我们的结果表明,无论与学生不适应、评分者不适应和评分者严重程度相关的条件如何,TDS在各种心理测量结果上都没有明显的优势。这项研究对混合形式的评估具有重要意义,为双重评分方法的综合评估提供了见解。我们建议研究人员在考虑双重评分程序时考虑这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the Psychometric Impact of Targeted and Random Double-Scoring in Mixed-Format Assessments

Double-scoring constructed-response items is a common but costly practice in mixed-format assessments. This study explored the impacts of Targeted Double-Scoring (TDS) and random double-scoring procedures on the quality of psychometric outcomes, including student achievement estimates, person fit, and student classifications under various conditions that reflect operational performance assessments. Using a simulation study, our results suggest no notable advantages for TDS over the random double-scoring approach across various psychometric outcomes, regardless of conditions related to student misfit, rater misfit, and rater severity. This study holds significant implications for mixed-format assessments, offering insights into a comprehensive evaluation of double-scoring methods. We recommend that researchers consider these findings when considering among double-scoring procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信