低与高外周氧饱和度定向氧治疗危重患者:一项多中心随机对照试验

IF 10.7 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
MedComm Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1002/mco2.70098
Xiaobo Yang, Xuehui Gao, Xiang Zheng, Xu Zhao, Yanli Liu, Lu Zhang, Junli Sun, Peng Wang, Zhengqin Xu, Ronghua Hu, Hongbin Li, Hong Qi, Yin Yuan, Wei Chen, Jie Liu, Guangqing Huang, Li Yu, Fengsheng Cao, Keke Xin, Min Yu, Xiaoyun Liu, Li Zhang, Siyuan Chang, Xiaojing Zou, Hong Liu, Zhaohui Fu, Huaqing Shu, Yuan Yu, Jiqian Xu, Shiying Yuan, You Shang
{"title":"低与高外周氧饱和度定向氧治疗危重患者:一项多中心随机对照试验","authors":"Xiaobo Yang,&nbsp;Xuehui Gao,&nbsp;Xiang Zheng,&nbsp;Xu Zhao,&nbsp;Yanli Liu,&nbsp;Lu Zhang,&nbsp;Junli Sun,&nbsp;Peng Wang,&nbsp;Zhengqin Xu,&nbsp;Ronghua Hu,&nbsp;Hongbin Li,&nbsp;Hong Qi,&nbsp;Yin Yuan,&nbsp;Wei Chen,&nbsp;Jie Liu,&nbsp;Guangqing Huang,&nbsp;Li Yu,&nbsp;Fengsheng Cao,&nbsp;Keke Xin,&nbsp;Min Yu,&nbsp;Xiaoyun Liu,&nbsp;Li Zhang,&nbsp;Siyuan Chang,&nbsp;Xiaojing Zou,&nbsp;Hong Liu,&nbsp;Zhaohui Fu,&nbsp;Huaqing Shu,&nbsp;Yuan Yu,&nbsp;Jiqian Xu,&nbsp;Shiying Yuan,&nbsp;You Shang","doi":"10.1002/mco2.70098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Whether low peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) directed oxygen therapy is associated with lower mortality in critically ill patients needs further exploration. Adult critically ill patients from 11 intensive care units in China were screened. Participants were randomly assigned to the low SpO<sub>2</sub> (90%–95%) group or the high SpO<sub>2</sub> (≥96%) -group. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were hours free from ventilators and from renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 14 days. Note that 857 patients in the low SpO<sub>2</sub> group and 849 in the high SpO<sub>2</sub> group were included. In the low SpO<sub>2</sub> group versus the high SpO<sub>2</sub> group, the time-weighted average of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) was significantly lower (33.5 ± 9.7% vs. 39.6 ± 9.3%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and so was the time-weighted average of SpO<sub>2</sub> (95.9 ± 1.8% vs. 98.0 ± 1.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Within 28 days after randomization, 172 (20.1%) in the low SpO<sub>2</sub> group and 193 (22.7%) in the high SpO<sub>2</sub> group died (<i>p</i> = 0.180). Ventilator-free time and RRT-free time were not significantly different within 14 days. In critically ill patients, low SpO<sub>2</sub>directed oxygen therapy did not decrease 28-day mortality, 14-day ventilator-free time, or 14-day RRT-free time.</p>","PeriodicalId":94133,"journal":{"name":"MedComm","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mco2.70098","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low versus high peripheral oxygen saturation directed oxygen therapy in critically ill patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Xiaobo Yang,&nbsp;Xuehui Gao,&nbsp;Xiang Zheng,&nbsp;Xu Zhao,&nbsp;Yanli Liu,&nbsp;Lu Zhang,&nbsp;Junli Sun,&nbsp;Peng Wang,&nbsp;Zhengqin Xu,&nbsp;Ronghua Hu,&nbsp;Hongbin Li,&nbsp;Hong Qi,&nbsp;Yin Yuan,&nbsp;Wei Chen,&nbsp;Jie Liu,&nbsp;Guangqing Huang,&nbsp;Li Yu,&nbsp;Fengsheng Cao,&nbsp;Keke Xin,&nbsp;Min Yu,&nbsp;Xiaoyun Liu,&nbsp;Li Zhang,&nbsp;Siyuan Chang,&nbsp;Xiaojing Zou,&nbsp;Hong Liu,&nbsp;Zhaohui Fu,&nbsp;Huaqing Shu,&nbsp;Yuan Yu,&nbsp;Jiqian Xu,&nbsp;Shiying Yuan,&nbsp;You Shang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mco2.70098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Whether low peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) directed oxygen therapy is associated with lower mortality in critically ill patients needs further exploration. Adult critically ill patients from 11 intensive care units in China were screened. Participants were randomly assigned to the low SpO<sub>2</sub> (90%–95%) group or the high SpO<sub>2</sub> (≥96%) -group. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were hours free from ventilators and from renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 14 days. Note that 857 patients in the low SpO<sub>2</sub> group and 849 in the high SpO<sub>2</sub> group were included. In the low SpO<sub>2</sub> group versus the high SpO<sub>2</sub> group, the time-weighted average of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) was significantly lower (33.5 ± 9.7% vs. 39.6 ± 9.3%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and so was the time-weighted average of SpO<sub>2</sub> (95.9 ± 1.8% vs. 98.0 ± 1.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Within 28 days after randomization, 172 (20.1%) in the low SpO<sub>2</sub> group and 193 (22.7%) in the high SpO<sub>2</sub> group died (<i>p</i> = 0.180). Ventilator-free time and RRT-free time were not significantly different within 14 days. In critically ill patients, low SpO<sub>2</sub>directed oxygen therapy did not decrease 28-day mortality, 14-day ventilator-free time, or 14-day RRT-free time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedComm\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mco2.70098\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedComm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mco2.70098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedComm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mco2.70098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低外周血氧饱和度(SpO2)引导氧疗是否与降低重症患者死亡率有关,还需要进一步探讨。研究筛选了来自中国 11 个重症监护病房的成年重症患者。参与者被随机分配到低SpO2(90%-95%)组或高SpO2(≥96%)组。主要结果是28天的全因死亡率。次要结果是14天内无呼吸机和无肾脏替代治疗(RRT)的小时数。请注意,低 SpO2 组有 857 名患者,高 SpO2 组有 849 名患者。低 SpO2 组与高 SpO2 组相比,吸入氧分压(FiO2)的时间加权平均值显著降低(33.5 ± 9.7% vs. 39.6 ± 9.3%,p < 0.001),SpO2 的时间加权平均值也显著降低(95.9 ± 1.8% vs. 98.0 ± 1.9%,p < 0.001)。在随机分组后的 28 天内,低 SpO2 组有 172 人(20.1%)死亡,高 SpO2 组有 193 人(22.7%)死亡(p = 0.180)。无呼吸机时间和无 RRT 时间在 14 天内无明显差异。在重症患者中,低 SpO2 引导氧疗不会降低 28 天死亡率、14 天无呼吸机时间或 14 天无 RRT 时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Low versus high peripheral oxygen saturation directed oxygen therapy in critically ill patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Low versus high peripheral oxygen saturation directed oxygen therapy in critically ill patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Whether low peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) directed oxygen therapy is associated with lower mortality in critically ill patients needs further exploration. Adult critically ill patients from 11 intensive care units in China were screened. Participants were randomly assigned to the low SpO2 (90%–95%) group or the high SpO2 (≥96%) -group. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were hours free from ventilators and from renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 14 days. Note that 857 patients in the low SpO2 group and 849 in the high SpO2 group were included. In the low SpO2 group versus the high SpO2 group, the time-weighted average of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) was significantly lower (33.5 ± 9.7% vs. 39.6 ± 9.3%, p < 0.001), and so was the time-weighted average of SpO2 (95.9 ± 1.8% vs. 98.0 ± 1.9%, p < 0.001). Within 28 days after randomization, 172 (20.1%) in the low SpO2 group and 193 (22.7%) in the high SpO2 group died (p = 0.180). Ventilator-free time and RRT-free time were not significantly different within 14 days. In critically ill patients, low SpO2directed oxygen therapy did not decrease 28-day mortality, 14-day ventilator-free time, or 14-day RRT-free time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信