脂质和多变量为基础的分析,以确定细胞对pH变化和缓冲成分的反应

IF 2.6 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Ricardo F. S. Pereira, Carla C. C. R. de Carvalho
{"title":"脂质和多变量为基础的分析,以确定细胞对pH变化和缓冲成分的反应","authors":"Ricardo F. S. Pereira,&nbsp;Carla C. C. R. de Carvalho","doi":"10.1007/s10126-025-10421-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During marine bioprocess development, pH control is of paramount importance. In shake flasks, aerobic fermentations usually have no pH control except from the buffering effect provided by buffers in the medium. However, the use of traditional buffers, such as phosphate buffer, can lead to the precipitation of medium components. Good’s buffers may be a sound alternative. Using <i>Serratia rubidaea</i> cells and their production of prodigiosin as model system, several Good’s buffers were tested and compared to phosphate buffer. Lipidomics analysis in conjugation with statistical multivariate analysis was performed to determine the cellular response to pH variations and buffer composition. Biomass productivity was similar when using the different buffers, but prodigiosin production was highly influenced and was highest with MES buffer at pH 5.5, reaching 249.8 mg/L, which corresponds to 43.7 mg/g<sub>biomass</sub>. At pH 7.0, the best results were achieved with EPPS, HEPES and TRIS buffer, being these good substitutes for phosphate buffer in marine medium. The results also show that cells adapted the fatty acid composition of their membranes as response to the buffering species present in the growth medium. This is a clear indication that the buffer composition should not be disregarded when developing a bioprocess.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":690,"journal":{"name":"Marine Biotechnology","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10126-025-10421-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lipid- and Multivariate-Based Analyses to Determine Cell Response to pH Variations and Buffer Composition\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo F. S. Pereira,&nbsp;Carla C. C. R. de Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10126-025-10421-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>During marine bioprocess development, pH control is of paramount importance. In shake flasks, aerobic fermentations usually have no pH control except from the buffering effect provided by buffers in the medium. However, the use of traditional buffers, such as phosphate buffer, can lead to the precipitation of medium components. Good’s buffers may be a sound alternative. Using <i>Serratia rubidaea</i> cells and their production of prodigiosin as model system, several Good’s buffers were tested and compared to phosphate buffer. Lipidomics analysis in conjugation with statistical multivariate analysis was performed to determine the cellular response to pH variations and buffer composition. Biomass productivity was similar when using the different buffers, but prodigiosin production was highly influenced and was highest with MES buffer at pH 5.5, reaching 249.8 mg/L, which corresponds to 43.7 mg/g<sub>biomass</sub>. At pH 7.0, the best results were achieved with EPPS, HEPES and TRIS buffer, being these good substitutes for phosphate buffer in marine medium. The results also show that cells adapted the fatty acid composition of their membranes as response to the buffering species present in the growth medium. This is a clear indication that the buffer composition should not be disregarded when developing a bioprocess.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10126-025-10421-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10126-025-10421-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10126-025-10421-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在海洋生物过程的发展中,pH控制是至关重要的。在摇瓶中,除了培养基中的缓冲液提供的缓冲作用外,好氧发酵通常没有pH控制。然而,使用传统的缓冲液,如磷酸盐缓冲液,会导致介质成分的沉淀。古德的缓冲或许是一个不错的选择。以红沙雷氏菌细胞及其产生的芥子红素为模型系统,对几种Good’s缓冲液进行了测试,并与磷酸盐缓冲液进行了比较。脂质组学分析结合统计多变量分析来确定细胞对pH变化和缓冲液组成的反应。不同缓冲剂对菌体生物量的影响相似,但对菌体的影响较大,在pH为5.5的缓冲剂中菌体的产量最高,达到249.8 mg/L,相当于43.7 mg/ g生物量。在pH 7.0时,EPPS、HEPES和TRIS缓冲液是海洋介质中磷酸盐缓冲液的良好替代品,效果最好。结果还表明,细胞适应其膜的脂肪酸组成,作为对生长培养基中存在的缓冲物质的反应。这清楚地表明,在开发生物工艺时不应忽视缓冲组合物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lipid- and Multivariate-Based Analyses to Determine Cell Response to pH Variations and Buffer Composition

During marine bioprocess development, pH control is of paramount importance. In shake flasks, aerobic fermentations usually have no pH control except from the buffering effect provided by buffers in the medium. However, the use of traditional buffers, such as phosphate buffer, can lead to the precipitation of medium components. Good’s buffers may be a sound alternative. Using Serratia rubidaea cells and their production of prodigiosin as model system, several Good’s buffers were tested and compared to phosphate buffer. Lipidomics analysis in conjugation with statistical multivariate analysis was performed to determine the cellular response to pH variations and buffer composition. Biomass productivity was similar when using the different buffers, but prodigiosin production was highly influenced and was highest with MES buffer at pH 5.5, reaching 249.8 mg/L, which corresponds to 43.7 mg/gbiomass. At pH 7.0, the best results were achieved with EPPS, HEPES and TRIS buffer, being these good substitutes for phosphate buffer in marine medium. The results also show that cells adapted the fatty acid composition of their membranes as response to the buffering species present in the growth medium. This is a clear indication that the buffer composition should not be disregarded when developing a bioprocess.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Biotechnology
Marine Biotechnology 工程技术-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
95
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Marine Biotechnology welcomes high-quality research papers presenting novel data on the biotechnology of aquatic organisms. The journal publishes high quality papers in the areas of molecular biology, genomics, proteomics, cell biology, and biochemistry, and particularly encourages submissions of papers related to genome biology such as linkage mapping, large-scale gene discoveries, QTL analysis, physical mapping, and comparative and functional genome analysis. Papers on technological development and marine natural products should demonstrate innovation and novel applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信