宽带互联网与流动人口收入不平等:来自中国“宽带中国”战略的证据

IF 5.5 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Qingfeng Cao , Pengfei Ni , Jing Guo
{"title":"宽带互联网与流动人口收入不平等:来自中国“宽带中国”战略的证据","authors":"Qingfeng Cao ,&nbsp;Pengfei Ni ,&nbsp;Jing Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using the “Broadband China” strategy as a quasi-natural experiment, we employ the difference-in-differences model to examine the impact of broadband internet on the income inequality among the floating population based on the panel data of 35 major cities in China from 2011 to 2018. We find that broadband internet significantly widens the income inequality among the floating population. This conclusion still holds after robust tests including parallel trends, placebo, endogeneity, and treatment effects heterogeneity. The mechanism analysis indicates that broadband internet widens income gap between the high-skilled and low-skilled floating population, as well as between the urban and non-urban registered household floating population, but does not substitute for labor. Further analysis shows that broadband internet leads to skill-biased technological progress rather than routine-biased technological progress, has a greater effect on widening the income inequality among the inter-province, established and young floating population, and represents a Pareto improvement for the floating population's welfare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 102369"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Broadband internet and income inequality among the floating population: Evidence from the “broadband China” strategy in China\",\"authors\":\"Qingfeng Cao ,&nbsp;Pengfei Ni ,&nbsp;Jing Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using the “Broadband China” strategy as a quasi-natural experiment, we employ the difference-in-differences model to examine the impact of broadband internet on the income inequality among the floating population based on the panel data of 35 major cities in China from 2011 to 2018. We find that broadband internet significantly widens the income inequality among the floating population. This conclusion still holds after robust tests including parallel trends, placebo, endogeneity, and treatment effects heterogeneity. The mechanism analysis indicates that broadband internet widens income gap between the high-skilled and low-skilled floating population, as well as between the urban and non-urban registered household floating population, but does not substitute for labor. Further analysis shows that broadband internet leads to skill-biased technological progress rather than routine-biased technological progress, has a greater effect on widening the income inequality among the inter-province, established and young floating population, and represents a Pareto improvement for the floating population's welfare.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国经济评论\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国经济评论\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25000276\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25000276","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以“宽带中国”战略为准自然实验,基于2011 - 2018年中国35个主要城市的面板数据,采用差中差模型考察了宽带互联网对流动人口收入不平等的影响。研究发现,宽带互联网显著扩大了流动人口的收入不平等。在包括平行趋势、安慰剂、内生性和治疗效果异质性在内的强有力的检验后,这一结论仍然成立。机制分析表明,宽带互联网扩大了高技能和低技能流动人口之间、城市和非城市户籍流动人口之间的收入差距,但没有替代劳动力。进一步分析表明,宽带互联网导致了技能偏倚的技术进步,而不是常规偏倚的技术进步,对扩大省际、成熟和年轻流动人口之间的收入不平等有更大的影响,对流动人口的福利有帕累托改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Broadband internet and income inequality among the floating population: Evidence from the “broadband China” strategy in China
Using the “Broadband China” strategy as a quasi-natural experiment, we employ the difference-in-differences model to examine the impact of broadband internet on the income inequality among the floating population based on the panel data of 35 major cities in China from 2011 to 2018. We find that broadband internet significantly widens the income inequality among the floating population. This conclusion still holds after robust tests including parallel trends, placebo, endogeneity, and treatment effects heterogeneity. The mechanism analysis indicates that broadband internet widens income gap between the high-skilled and low-skilled floating population, as well as between the urban and non-urban registered household floating population, but does not substitute for labor. Further analysis shows that broadband internet leads to skill-biased technological progress rather than routine-biased technological progress, has a greater effect on widening the income inequality among the inter-province, established and young floating population, and represents a Pareto improvement for the floating population's welfare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国经济评论
中国经济评论 ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.40%
发文量
380
期刊介绍: The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信