利用帝国主义竞争算法优化棉花和油菜生产中的能源使用效率和环境绩效

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Mousa Mirmoradi , Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi , Hamed Afshari , Ahmad Mohammadi
{"title":"利用帝国主义竞争算法优化棉花和油菜生产中的能源使用效率和环境绩效","authors":"Mousa Mirmoradi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi ,&nbsp;Hamed Afshari ,&nbsp;Ahmad Mohammadi","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study focuses on optimizing energy efficiency and environmental performance in the production of cotton and canola through the application of the Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA). Conducted in the Dasht-e Gorgan region of Iran, the research provides a comprehensive analysis of energy inputs and outputs for both crops. The findings reveal distinct differences in energy utilization, with cotton requiring significantly more labor (120 h) and machine energy (6,270 MJ) compared to canola, which utilizes less labor (79 h) and machine energy (2,821.5 MJ). However, canola's dependency on diesel fuel is higher, consuming 6,757.21 MJ against cotton's 5,631 MJ. While cotton demonstrates greater nitrogen energy utilization at 7,810 MJ, canola's nitrogen consumption by volume is 10,153 MJ. Furthermore, cotton production incurs higher biocide energy inputs (1,750 MJ) due to pest management challenges. Total energy consumption per hectare is slightly higher for cotton (26,083.80 MJ) relative to canola (25,747.04 MJ), yet cotton yields greater output (2,900 kg vs. 2,300 kg), indicating superior yield efficiency. Energy use efficiency favors canola with a conversion rate of 2.23 compared to cotton's 1.31, as well as a significantly higher net energy gain (31,752.96 MJ ha<sup>–1</sup> for canola versus 8,136.20 MJ ha<sup>–1</sup> for cotton). Environmental impacts also differ; canola's fertilizer use contributes more nitrogen oxides and ammonia, potentially affecting water quality, while cotton's labor-intensive methods lead to increased emissions of heavy metals and CO<sub>2</sub>. In terms of human health impacts, cotton shows a lower Disability-Adjusted Life Years (0.064 DALY) compared to canola (0.089 DALY). Financially, cotton demonstrates lower resource intensity (115.36 USD2013) than canola (187.56 USD2013). To mitigate the environmental effects associated with both crops, this study recommends strategies such as precision agriculture, the integration of renewable energy, and enhancements in soil health, all aimed at improving overall sustainability in cotton and canola production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100392"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing energy use efficiency and environmental performance in cotton and canola production using the Imperialist Competitive Algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Mousa Mirmoradi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi ,&nbsp;Hamed Afshari ,&nbsp;Ahmad Mohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study focuses on optimizing energy efficiency and environmental performance in the production of cotton and canola through the application of the Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA). Conducted in the Dasht-e Gorgan region of Iran, the research provides a comprehensive analysis of energy inputs and outputs for both crops. The findings reveal distinct differences in energy utilization, with cotton requiring significantly more labor (120 h) and machine energy (6,270 MJ) compared to canola, which utilizes less labor (79 h) and machine energy (2,821.5 MJ). However, canola's dependency on diesel fuel is higher, consuming 6,757.21 MJ against cotton's 5,631 MJ. While cotton demonstrates greater nitrogen energy utilization at 7,810 MJ, canola's nitrogen consumption by volume is 10,153 MJ. Furthermore, cotton production incurs higher biocide energy inputs (1,750 MJ) due to pest management challenges. Total energy consumption per hectare is slightly higher for cotton (26,083.80 MJ) relative to canola (25,747.04 MJ), yet cotton yields greater output (2,900 kg vs. 2,300 kg), indicating superior yield efficiency. Energy use efficiency favors canola with a conversion rate of 2.23 compared to cotton's 1.31, as well as a significantly higher net energy gain (31,752.96 MJ ha<sup>–1</sup> for canola versus 8,136.20 MJ ha<sup>–1</sup> for cotton). Environmental impacts also differ; canola's fertilizer use contributes more nitrogen oxides and ammonia, potentially affecting water quality, while cotton's labor-intensive methods lead to increased emissions of heavy metals and CO<sub>2</sub>. In terms of human health impacts, cotton shows a lower Disability-Adjusted Life Years (0.064 DALY) compared to canola (0.089 DALY). Financially, cotton demonstrates lower resource intensity (115.36 USD2013) than canola (187.56 USD2013). To mitigate the environmental effects associated with both crops, this study recommends strategies such as precision agriculture, the integration of renewable energy, and enhancements in soil health, all aimed at improving overall sustainability in cotton and canola production.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy nexus\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy nexus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125000336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125000336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是通过应用帝国主义竞争算法(ICA)来优化棉花和油菜生产中的能源效率和环境绩效。这项研究在伊朗的dash -e Gorgan地区进行,对这两种作物的能源投入和产出进行了全面分析。研究结果揭示了能源利用的明显差异,与油菜相比,棉花需要更多的劳动力(120小时)和机器能量(6270兆焦赫),油菜利用更少的劳动力(79小时)和机器能量(2821.5兆焦赫)。然而,油菜籽对柴油的依赖更高,消耗6,757.21焦耳,而棉花消耗5,631焦耳。棉花的氮能量利用率更高,为7810mj,而油菜的氮消耗量为10153 MJ。此外,由于虫害管理方面的挑战,棉花生产需要更高的杀菌剂能量投入(1,750兆焦耳)。棉花每公顷总能耗(26,083.80兆焦耳)略高于油菜(25,747.04兆焦耳),但棉花产量更高(2,900公斤对2,300公斤),表明产量效率更高。能源利用效率有利于油菜籽,其转化率为2.23,而棉花为1.31,净能量增益也明显更高(油菜籽为31,752.96 MJ ha-1,而棉花为8,136.20 MJ ha-1)。环境影响也各不相同;油菜籽的肥料使用会产生更多的氮氧化物和氨,可能会影响水质,而棉花的劳动密集型方法会导致重金属和二氧化碳的排放增加。在对人类健康的影响方面,棉花的残疾调整生命年(0.064 DALY)低于油菜(0.089 DALY)。从财务上看,棉花的资源强度(2013年为115.36美元)低于油菜籽(2013年为187.56美元)。为了减轻与这两种作物相关的环境影响,本研究推荐了诸如精准农业、可再生能源整合和土壤健康增强等策略,所有这些都旨在提高棉花和油菜生产的整体可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing energy use efficiency and environmental performance in cotton and canola production using the Imperialist Competitive Algorithm
This study focuses on optimizing energy efficiency and environmental performance in the production of cotton and canola through the application of the Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA). Conducted in the Dasht-e Gorgan region of Iran, the research provides a comprehensive analysis of energy inputs and outputs for both crops. The findings reveal distinct differences in energy utilization, with cotton requiring significantly more labor (120 h) and machine energy (6,270 MJ) compared to canola, which utilizes less labor (79 h) and machine energy (2,821.5 MJ). However, canola's dependency on diesel fuel is higher, consuming 6,757.21 MJ against cotton's 5,631 MJ. While cotton demonstrates greater nitrogen energy utilization at 7,810 MJ, canola's nitrogen consumption by volume is 10,153 MJ. Furthermore, cotton production incurs higher biocide energy inputs (1,750 MJ) due to pest management challenges. Total energy consumption per hectare is slightly higher for cotton (26,083.80 MJ) relative to canola (25,747.04 MJ), yet cotton yields greater output (2,900 kg vs. 2,300 kg), indicating superior yield efficiency. Energy use efficiency favors canola with a conversion rate of 2.23 compared to cotton's 1.31, as well as a significantly higher net energy gain (31,752.96 MJ ha–1 for canola versus 8,136.20 MJ ha–1 for cotton). Environmental impacts also differ; canola's fertilizer use contributes more nitrogen oxides and ammonia, potentially affecting water quality, while cotton's labor-intensive methods lead to increased emissions of heavy metals and CO2. In terms of human health impacts, cotton shows a lower Disability-Adjusted Life Years (0.064 DALY) compared to canola (0.089 DALY). Financially, cotton demonstrates lower resource intensity (115.36 USD2013) than canola (187.56 USD2013). To mitigate the environmental effects associated with both crops, this study recommends strategies such as precision agriculture, the integration of renewable energy, and enhancements in soil health, all aimed at improving overall sustainability in cotton and canola production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信