探索人类大脑皮层的超弹性材料模型发现:多元分析与人工神经网络方法

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jixin Hou , Nicholas Filla , Xianyan Chen , Mir Jalil Razavi , Dajiang Zhu , Tianming Liu , Xianqiao Wang
{"title":"探索人类大脑皮层的超弹性材料模型发现:多元分析与人工神经网络方法","authors":"Jixin Hou ,&nbsp;Nicholas Filla ,&nbsp;Xianyan Chen ,&nbsp;Mir Jalil Razavi ,&nbsp;Dajiang Zhu ,&nbsp;Tianming Liu ,&nbsp;Xianqiao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.106934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The human brain, characterized by its intricate architecture, exhibits complex mechanical properties that underpin its critical functional capabilities. Traditional computational methods, such as finite element analysis, have been instrumental in uncovering the fundamental mechanisms governing the brain's physical behaviors. However, accurate predictions of brain mechanics require effective constitutive models to represent the nuanced mechanical properties of brain tissue. In this study, we aimed to identify well-suited material models for human brain tissue by leveraging artificial neural network and multiple regression techniques. These methods were applied to a generalized framework of widely accepted classic models, and their respective outcomes were systematically compared. To evaluate model efficacy, all setups were maintained consistent across both approaches, except for strategies employed to mitigate potential overfitting. Our findings reveal that artificial neural networks are capable of automatically identifying accurate constitutive models from given admissible estimators. However, the five-term and two-term neural network models trained under single-mode and multi-mode loading scenarios, respectively, were found to be suboptimal. These models could be further simplified into two-term and single-term formulations using multiple regression, achieving even higher predictive accuracy. This refinement underscores the importance of rigorous cross-validations of regularization parameters in neural network-based methods to ensure globally optimal model selection. Additionally, our study demonstrates that traditional multivariable regression methods, when combined with appropriate information criterion, are also highly effective in discovering optimal constitutive models. These insights contribute to the ongoing development of advanced material constitutive models, particularly for complex biological tissues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 106934"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring hyperelastic material model discovery for human brain cortex: Multivariate analysis vs. artificial neural network approaches\",\"authors\":\"Jixin Hou ,&nbsp;Nicholas Filla ,&nbsp;Xianyan Chen ,&nbsp;Mir Jalil Razavi ,&nbsp;Dajiang Zhu ,&nbsp;Tianming Liu ,&nbsp;Xianqiao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.106934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The human brain, characterized by its intricate architecture, exhibits complex mechanical properties that underpin its critical functional capabilities. Traditional computational methods, such as finite element analysis, have been instrumental in uncovering the fundamental mechanisms governing the brain's physical behaviors. However, accurate predictions of brain mechanics require effective constitutive models to represent the nuanced mechanical properties of brain tissue. In this study, we aimed to identify well-suited material models for human brain tissue by leveraging artificial neural network and multiple regression techniques. These methods were applied to a generalized framework of widely accepted classic models, and their respective outcomes were systematically compared. To evaluate model efficacy, all setups were maintained consistent across both approaches, except for strategies employed to mitigate potential overfitting. Our findings reveal that artificial neural networks are capable of automatically identifying accurate constitutive models from given admissible estimators. However, the five-term and two-term neural network models trained under single-mode and multi-mode loading scenarios, respectively, were found to be suboptimal. These models could be further simplified into two-term and single-term formulations using multiple regression, achieving even higher predictive accuracy. This refinement underscores the importance of rigorous cross-validations of regularization parameters in neural network-based methods to ensure globally optimal model selection. Additionally, our study demonstrates that traditional multivariable regression methods, when combined with appropriate information criterion, are also highly effective in discovering optimal constitutive models. These insights contribute to the ongoing development of advanced material constitutive models, particularly for complex biological tissues.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616125000505\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616125000505","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类大脑以其复杂的结构为特征,展现出复杂的机械特性,支撑着其关键的功能能力。传统的计算方法,如有限元分析,在揭示控制大脑物理行为的基本机制方面发挥了重要作用。然而,脑力学的准确预测需要有效的本构模型来代表脑组织的细微力学特性。在这项研究中,我们旨在利用人工神经网络和多元回归技术来确定适合人类脑组织的材料模型。将这些方法应用于广泛接受的经典模型的广义框架中,并对各自的结果进行了系统比较。为了评估模型的有效性,除了用于减轻潜在过拟合的策略外,两种方法的所有设置都保持一致。我们的研究结果表明,人工神经网络能够从给定的可接受估计量中自动识别准确的本构模型。然而,分别在单模态和多模态加载场景下训练的五期和两期神经网络模型是次优的。这些模型可以使用多元回归进一步简化为两项和单项公式,从而实现更高的预测精度。这种改进强调了在基于神经网络的方法中严格交叉验证正则化参数以确保全局最优模型选择的重要性。此外,我们的研究表明,当结合适当的信息准则时,传统的多变量回归方法在发现最优本构模型方面也是非常有效的。这些见解有助于先进材料本构模型的持续发展,特别是复杂的生物组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring hyperelastic material model discovery for human brain cortex: Multivariate analysis vs. artificial neural network approaches

Exploring hyperelastic material model discovery for human brain cortex: Multivariate analysis vs. artificial neural network approaches
The human brain, characterized by its intricate architecture, exhibits complex mechanical properties that underpin its critical functional capabilities. Traditional computational methods, such as finite element analysis, have been instrumental in uncovering the fundamental mechanisms governing the brain's physical behaviors. However, accurate predictions of brain mechanics require effective constitutive models to represent the nuanced mechanical properties of brain tissue. In this study, we aimed to identify well-suited material models for human brain tissue by leveraging artificial neural network and multiple regression techniques. These methods were applied to a generalized framework of widely accepted classic models, and their respective outcomes were systematically compared. To evaluate model efficacy, all setups were maintained consistent across both approaches, except for strategies employed to mitigate potential overfitting. Our findings reveal that artificial neural networks are capable of automatically identifying accurate constitutive models from given admissible estimators. However, the five-term and two-term neural network models trained under single-mode and multi-mode loading scenarios, respectively, were found to be suboptimal. These models could be further simplified into two-term and single-term formulations using multiple regression, achieving even higher predictive accuracy. This refinement underscores the importance of rigorous cross-validations of regularization parameters in neural network-based methods to ensure globally optimal model selection. Additionally, our study demonstrates that traditional multivariable regression methods, when combined with appropriate information criterion, are also highly effective in discovering optimal constitutive models. These insights contribute to the ongoing development of advanced material constitutive models, particularly for complex biological tissues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
505
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials. The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信