小鼠体内轴向胫骨和尺骨双重压缩载荷对骨骼的影响

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Olivia N. Reul, Rachel K. Surowiec, Nusaiba N. Chowdhury, Dyann M. Segvich, Joseph M. Wallace
{"title":"小鼠体内轴向胫骨和尺骨双重压缩载荷对骨骼的影响","authors":"Olivia N. Reul,&nbsp;Rachel K. Surowiec,&nbsp;Nusaiba N. Chowdhury,&nbsp;Dyann M. Segvich,&nbsp;Joseph M. Wallace","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.106950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of compressive axial tibial loading for evaluation of bone adaptation and mechanotransduction has become a common technique in recent years. Despite its popularity, it only produces a single experimental limb per animal which can escalate sample sizes depending on study endpoints. We hypothesized the combination of compressive axial tibial and ulnar loading in a single animal would induce bone formation in loaded limbs, providing two experimental limbs per animal thereby reducing the animals required per study by half. Male and female C57BL/6J mice were purchased at 9 and 19 weeks (wks). Based on sex and age they were divided into 4 groups of N = 17. From each group, N = 5 were sacrificed at 10 and 20 wks for strain gauge calibration. At 11 wks and 21 wks, the left ulnae and right tibiae of the remaining animals (N = 12/group) were loaded 3 days/week for 4 weeks. Tibiae of all groups experienced significant increases in architectural properties due to loading in both trabecular and cortical compartments while there were no significant improvements in the ulna. Female tibiae showed improvements in mechanical properties, but these were not observed in the male tibiae where detrimental impacts were observed. In the ulna, females showed limited mechanical changes due to loading. Contrastingly, loading in males at 11 wks led to decreased mechanical properties while at 21 wks no impacts were observed. Overall, reported beneficial impacts of loading in tibiae were observed in architectural properties but were not maintained in the males’ mechanical properties. Impacts of ulnar loading on architectural and whole bone mechanical properties that have been reported elsewhere were not observed in any groups. These data suggest when architectural and mechanical properties are end points, combined loading is not optimal for reducing the number of animals required per study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 106950"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skeletal impacts of dual in vivo compressive axial tibial and ulnar loading in mice\",\"authors\":\"Olivia N. Reul,&nbsp;Rachel K. Surowiec,&nbsp;Nusaiba N. Chowdhury,&nbsp;Dyann M. Segvich,&nbsp;Joseph M. Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.106950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The use of compressive axial tibial loading for evaluation of bone adaptation and mechanotransduction has become a common technique in recent years. Despite its popularity, it only produces a single experimental limb per animal which can escalate sample sizes depending on study endpoints. We hypothesized the combination of compressive axial tibial and ulnar loading in a single animal would induce bone formation in loaded limbs, providing two experimental limbs per animal thereby reducing the animals required per study by half. Male and female C57BL/6J mice were purchased at 9 and 19 weeks (wks). Based on sex and age they were divided into 4 groups of N = 17. From each group, N = 5 were sacrificed at 10 and 20 wks for strain gauge calibration. At 11 wks and 21 wks, the left ulnae and right tibiae of the remaining animals (N = 12/group) were loaded 3 days/week for 4 weeks. Tibiae of all groups experienced significant increases in architectural properties due to loading in both trabecular and cortical compartments while there were no significant improvements in the ulna. Female tibiae showed improvements in mechanical properties, but these were not observed in the male tibiae where detrimental impacts were observed. In the ulna, females showed limited mechanical changes due to loading. Contrastingly, loading in males at 11 wks led to decreased mechanical properties while at 21 wks no impacts were observed. Overall, reported beneficial impacts of loading in tibiae were observed in architectural properties but were not maintained in the males’ mechanical properties. Impacts of ulnar loading on architectural and whole bone mechanical properties that have been reported elsewhere were not observed in any groups. These data suggest when architectural and mechanical properties are end points, combined loading is not optimal for reducing the number of animals required per study.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106950\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616125000669\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616125000669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,使用胫骨轴向压缩载荷评估骨适应和机械转导已成为一种常见的技术。尽管它很受欢迎,但每只动物只能产生一个实验肢体,这可能会根据研究终点增加样本量。我们假设单个动物的胫骨轴向和尺侧压缩载荷的组合会诱导受载荷肢体的骨形成,每只动物提供两个实验肢体,从而将每次研究所需的动物数量减少一半。分别于第9周和第19周购买雄性和雌性C57BL/6J小鼠。根据性别和年龄分为4组,每组17人。每组分别于10周和20周处死N = 5,用于应变片校准。在11周和21周,其余动物(N = 12/组)的左尺骨和右胫骨每周加载3天,连续4周。由于骨小梁和皮质间室的负荷,所有组的胫骨的建筑特性都有显著的增加,而尺骨没有显著的改善。女性胫骨的机械性能有所改善,但在男性胫骨中没有观察到这些不利影响。在尺骨上,女性由于负荷表现出有限的机械变化。相反,在11周时,雄性小鼠的负荷导致机械性能下降,而在21周时,没有观察到任何影响。总的来说,已报道的胫骨载荷的有益影响在建筑性能上被观察到,但在男性的机械性能上没有得到维持。其他地方报道的尺骨负荷对建筑和全骨力学性能的影响在任何组中都没有观察到。这些数据表明,当建筑和机械性能作为终点时,联合加载对于减少每次研究所需的动物数量并不是最佳的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Skeletal impacts of dual in vivo compressive axial tibial and ulnar loading in mice

Skeletal impacts of dual in vivo compressive axial tibial and ulnar loading in mice
The use of compressive axial tibial loading for evaluation of bone adaptation and mechanotransduction has become a common technique in recent years. Despite its popularity, it only produces a single experimental limb per animal which can escalate sample sizes depending on study endpoints. We hypothesized the combination of compressive axial tibial and ulnar loading in a single animal would induce bone formation in loaded limbs, providing two experimental limbs per animal thereby reducing the animals required per study by half. Male and female C57BL/6J mice were purchased at 9 and 19 weeks (wks). Based on sex and age they were divided into 4 groups of N = 17. From each group, N = 5 were sacrificed at 10 and 20 wks for strain gauge calibration. At 11 wks and 21 wks, the left ulnae and right tibiae of the remaining animals (N = 12/group) were loaded 3 days/week for 4 weeks. Tibiae of all groups experienced significant increases in architectural properties due to loading in both trabecular and cortical compartments while there were no significant improvements in the ulna. Female tibiae showed improvements in mechanical properties, but these were not observed in the male tibiae where detrimental impacts were observed. In the ulna, females showed limited mechanical changes due to loading. Contrastingly, loading in males at 11 wks led to decreased mechanical properties while at 21 wks no impacts were observed. Overall, reported beneficial impacts of loading in tibiae were observed in architectural properties but were not maintained in the males’ mechanical properties. Impacts of ulnar loading on architectural and whole bone mechanical properties that have been reported elsewhere were not observed in any groups. These data suggest when architectural and mechanical properties are end points, combined loading is not optimal for reducing the number of animals required per study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
505
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials. The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信