高危工人的风险认知与安全行为:系统的文献综述

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Giulia Priolo , Michela Vignoli , Karina Nielsen
{"title":"高危工人的风险认知与安全行为:系统的文献综述","authors":"Giulia Priolo ,&nbsp;Michela Vignoli ,&nbsp;Karina Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The pervasive issue of occupational safety poses a compelling challenge within the global workforce causing a staggering amount of yearly injuries and fatalities worldwide. The relationship between risk perception and behaviors is of particular interest across various fields, but a comprehensive understanding of this association in the occupational sector is lacking. This systematic review examines the literature on the relationship between risk perception and safety behaviors among front-line workers in high-risk occupations for physical injuries. Using the PRISMA method, 89 peer-reviewed papers from the last two decades were synthesized. The findings revealed a common oversight in recognizing the multidimensional nature of risk perception as only seven out of 89 papers considered both its deliberative (i.e., perceived probability and severity of incurring a hazard’s negative consequences) and affective (i.e., emotional reactions associated with the hazard) dimensions. Despite this, a majority of studies found a significant positive association between risk perception and safety behaviors, although 40% reported mixed or null effects. Individual factors (e.g., attitudes) and organizational factors (e.g., safety climate) were explored as potential mediators with mixed outcomes, while group and leadership factors were largely neglected. This review provides guidelines for more comprehensive future assessments of risk perception in the workplace. Enhancing the understanding of both deliberative and affective dimensions of risk perception is essential for developing effective training programs to improve safety behaviors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 106811"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk perception and safety behaviors in high-risk workers: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Priolo ,&nbsp;Michela Vignoli ,&nbsp;Karina Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The pervasive issue of occupational safety poses a compelling challenge within the global workforce causing a staggering amount of yearly injuries and fatalities worldwide. The relationship between risk perception and behaviors is of particular interest across various fields, but a comprehensive understanding of this association in the occupational sector is lacking. This systematic review examines the literature on the relationship between risk perception and safety behaviors among front-line workers in high-risk occupations for physical injuries. Using the PRISMA method, 89 peer-reviewed papers from the last two decades were synthesized. The findings revealed a common oversight in recognizing the multidimensional nature of risk perception as only seven out of 89 papers considered both its deliberative (i.e., perceived probability and severity of incurring a hazard’s negative consequences) and affective (i.e., emotional reactions associated with the hazard) dimensions. Despite this, a majority of studies found a significant positive association between risk perception and safety behaviors, although 40% reported mixed or null effects. Individual factors (e.g., attitudes) and organizational factors (e.g., safety climate) were explored as potential mediators with mixed outcomes, while group and leadership factors were largely neglected. This review provides guidelines for more comprehensive future assessments of risk perception in the workplace. Enhancing the understanding of both deliberative and affective dimensions of risk perception is essential for developing effective training programs to improve safety behaviors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Safety Science\",\"volume\":\"186 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106811\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Safety Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753525000360\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753525000360","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

普遍存在的职业安全问题在全球劳动力中构成了一个引人注目的挑战,在世界范围内每年造成惊人数量的伤害和死亡。风险感知和行为之间的关系在各个领域都是特别有趣的,但在职业领域缺乏对这种联系的全面理解。本系统回顾研究了高危职业中一线工人的风险认知与安全行为之间的关系。使用PRISMA方法,合成了过去20年的89篇同行评议论文。调查结果揭示了在认识风险感知的多维性方面的普遍疏忽,因为89篇论文中只有7篇考虑了其审议性(即,感知到的发生危险的负面后果的概率和严重程度)和情感(即与危险相关的情绪反应)维度。尽管如此,大多数研究发现风险感知和安全行为之间存在显著的正相关,尽管40%的研究报告存在混合效应或无效效应。个体因素(如态度)和组织因素(如安全气候)作为潜在的中介因素进行了探索,结果好坏参半,而群体和领导因素在很大程度上被忽视了。本综述为今后更全面地评估工作场所的风险认知提供了指导。加强对风险感知的深思熟虑和情感维度的理解对于制定有效的培训计划以改善安全行为至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk perception and safety behaviors in high-risk workers: A systematic literature review
The pervasive issue of occupational safety poses a compelling challenge within the global workforce causing a staggering amount of yearly injuries and fatalities worldwide. The relationship between risk perception and behaviors is of particular interest across various fields, but a comprehensive understanding of this association in the occupational sector is lacking. This systematic review examines the literature on the relationship between risk perception and safety behaviors among front-line workers in high-risk occupations for physical injuries. Using the PRISMA method, 89 peer-reviewed papers from the last two decades were synthesized. The findings revealed a common oversight in recognizing the multidimensional nature of risk perception as only seven out of 89 papers considered both its deliberative (i.e., perceived probability and severity of incurring a hazard’s negative consequences) and affective (i.e., emotional reactions associated with the hazard) dimensions. Despite this, a majority of studies found a significant positive association between risk perception and safety behaviors, although 40% reported mixed or null effects. Individual factors (e.g., attitudes) and organizational factors (e.g., safety climate) were explored as potential mediators with mixed outcomes, while group and leadership factors were largely neglected. This review provides guidelines for more comprehensive future assessments of risk perception in the workplace. Enhancing the understanding of both deliberative and affective dimensions of risk perception is essential for developing effective training programs to improve safety behaviors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信