IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Jodi Oakman , Samantha Clune , Victoria P Weale
{"title":"Financial evaluation of interventions to reduce musculoskeletal disorder risk: A scoping review","authors":"Jodi Oakman ,&nbsp;Samantha Clune ,&nbsp;Victoria P Weale","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many interventions have aimed to reduce the incidence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) which are a costly occupational health problem. However, information on the return on investment of these interventions is limited. This scoping review mapped published evidence of types of financial tools used to assess the return on investment on interventions to reduce WMSDs. The level within the organisation at which the intervention was targeted was also examined.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science and Embase were searched from 2000 to August 2023. Studies with financial evaluations of workplaces intervention/s to reduce WSMDs were included. Coding of financial tools, cost and benefit factors, and the level at which interventions were targeted was undertaken. Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion. One author extracted data with review by a second author.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-five articles met the inclusion criteria. Included studies were mostly from the US (n = 9), Canada (n = 8) and the Netherlands (n = 6). Cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and return on investment approaches were used. Most commonly used cost factors included personnel, equipment, intervention costs, training, and consultant fees, and for economic benefits, productivity, absenteeism, and compensation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Current tools and approaches to economic evaluation do not take into account the likely efficacy of interventions and need to include a broader suite of cost and impact factors, based on known contributory factors such as exposure to psychosocial hazards and lead indicators such as reporting of musculoskeletal pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 106816"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753525000414","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与工作有关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSDs)是一个代价高昂的职业健康问题,许多干预措施都旨在降低其发病率。然而,有关这些干预措施投资回报的信息却很有限。本范围界定综述对用于评估减少 WMSDs 干预措施投资回报的财务工具类型的已发表证据进行了映射。方法检索了 2000 年至 2023 年 8 月期间的 PsycINFO、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Embase。研究纳入了对工作场所干预措施进行财务评估以减少 WSMDs 的研究。对财务工具、成本和收益因素以及干预措施的目标级别进行了编码。两位综述作者独立筛选纳入研究。结果35篇文章符合纳入标准。纳入的研究主要来自美国(9 篇)、加拿大(8 篇)和荷兰(6 篇)。研究采用了成本效益、成本效率、成本效用和投资回报等方法。最常用的成本因素包括人员、设备、干预成本、培训和顾问费,而对于经济效益,则包括生产率、缺勤率和赔偿金。结论 目前的经济评估工具和方法没有考虑到干预措施的可能功效,需要根据已知的促成因素(如暴露于社会心理危害)和领先指标(如肌肉骨骼疼痛报告),纳入更广泛的成本和影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financial evaluation of interventions to reduce musculoskeletal disorder risk: A scoping review
Many interventions have aimed to reduce the incidence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) which are a costly occupational health problem. However, information on the return on investment of these interventions is limited. This scoping review mapped published evidence of types of financial tools used to assess the return on investment on interventions to reduce WMSDs. The level within the organisation at which the intervention was targeted was also examined.

Method

PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science and Embase were searched from 2000 to August 2023. Studies with financial evaluations of workplaces intervention/s to reduce WSMDs were included. Coding of financial tools, cost and benefit factors, and the level at which interventions were targeted was undertaken. Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion. One author extracted data with review by a second author.

Results

Thirty-five articles met the inclusion criteria. Included studies were mostly from the US (n = 9), Canada (n = 8) and the Netherlands (n = 6). Cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and return on investment approaches were used. Most commonly used cost factors included personnel, equipment, intervention costs, training, and consultant fees, and for economic benefits, productivity, absenteeism, and compensation.

Conclusions

Current tools and approaches to economic evaluation do not take into account the likely efficacy of interventions and need to include a broader suite of cost and impact factors, based on known contributory factors such as exposure to psychosocial hazards and lead indicators such as reporting of musculoskeletal pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信