给我们的敌人更多的工作?技术民族主义时代的全球研发战略

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Hyungseok David Yoon , Evis Sinani , Marina Papanastassiou , Ioannis G. Economou
{"title":"给我们的敌人更多的工作?技术民族主义时代的全球研发战略","authors":"Hyungseok David Yoon ,&nbsp;Evis Sinani ,&nbsp;Marina Papanastassiou ,&nbsp;Ioannis G. Economou","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In light of rising techno-nationalism, MNEs (multinational enterprises) face heightened scrutiny over the legitimacy of their cross-border R&amp;D investments, especially in host countries with strained diplomatic relations with the MNEs' home countries. Drawing from a realism-based international relations perspective and legitimacy theory, our study explores the effect of diplomatic relations between home and host countries on MNEs' global R&amp;D strategy. We find that, in the face of adversarial diplomatic relations, MNEs increase their commitment to R&amp;D-related jobs as a strategy to gain legitimacy. This finding extends the R&amp;D internationalization literature by informing how MNEs navigate their efforts for legitimacy of their global R&amp;D investments in an era marked by techno-nationalism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 4","pages":"Article 105196"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More jobs for our foes? Global R&D strategy in the age of techno-nationalism\",\"authors\":\"Hyungseok David Yoon ,&nbsp;Evis Sinani ,&nbsp;Marina Papanastassiou ,&nbsp;Ioannis G. Economou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In light of rising techno-nationalism, MNEs (multinational enterprises) face heightened scrutiny over the legitimacy of their cross-border R&amp;D investments, especially in host countries with strained diplomatic relations with the MNEs' home countries. Drawing from a realism-based international relations perspective and legitimacy theory, our study explores the effect of diplomatic relations between home and host countries on MNEs' global R&amp;D strategy. We find that, in the face of adversarial diplomatic relations, MNEs increase their commitment to R&amp;D-related jobs as a strategy to gain legitimacy. This finding extends the R&amp;D internationalization literature by informing how MNEs navigate their efforts for legitimacy of their global R&amp;D investments in an era marked by techno-nationalism.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Policy\",\"volume\":\"54 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 105196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325000253\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325000253","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着技术民族主义的兴起,跨国公司在其跨境研发投资的合法性方面面临着更严格的审查,尤其是在与跨国公司母国外交关系紧张的东道国。本研究从现实主义的国际关系视角和合法性理论出发,探讨母国与东道国外交关系对跨国公司全球研发战略的影响。我们发现,面对敌对的外交关系,跨国公司增加了对研发相关工作的承诺,作为获得合法性的一种策略。这一发现通过告知跨国公司如何在以技术民族主义为标志的时代为其全球研发投资的合法性而努力,扩展了研发国际化文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
More jobs for our foes? Global R&D strategy in the age of techno-nationalism
In light of rising techno-nationalism, MNEs (multinational enterprises) face heightened scrutiny over the legitimacy of their cross-border R&D investments, especially in host countries with strained diplomatic relations with the MNEs' home countries. Drawing from a realism-based international relations perspective and legitimacy theory, our study explores the effect of diplomatic relations between home and host countries on MNEs' global R&D strategy. We find that, in the face of adversarial diplomatic relations, MNEs increase their commitment to R&D-related jobs as a strategy to gain legitimacy. This finding extends the R&D internationalization literature by informing how MNEs navigate their efforts for legitimacy of their global R&D investments in an era marked by techno-nationalism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信