希腊中至重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者Upadacitinib的成本-效果分析

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Charalampos Tzanetakos MSc , Marina Psarra MSc , Ilias Kotsis MSc , George Gourzoulidis MSc
{"title":"希腊中至重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者Upadacitinib的成本-效果分析","authors":"Charalampos Tzanetakos MSc ,&nbsp;Marina Psarra MSc ,&nbsp;Ilias Kotsis MSc ,&nbsp;George Gourzoulidis MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of upadacitinib in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC), who have had an inadequate response, lost response, or were intolerant to either conventional therapy (bio-naïve) or a biologic agent (bio-exposed), in Greece.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cost-effectiveness model, consisting of an 8-week decision tree model (induction period) and a long-term Markov state-transition model with a 4-week cycle length (maintenance period), was locally adapted from a public payer perspective over the patient’s lifetime. Upadacitinib was compared with other UC marketed biologics and small molecule agents in Greece. Clinical and utility data were retrieved from published literature. Direct costs pertaining to drug acquisition, administration, disease management, and adverse events were considered in the analysis. All cost inputs were indexed to 2023 euros. Model outcomes were patients’ quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the bio-naïve population, compared with adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, ozanimod, tofacitinib, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab, upadacitinib was found to be more effective (QALY gains: 0.833, 0.670, 0.671, 0.783, 0.314, 0.577, and 0.522, respectively) and cost-effective (ICERs: €18 618, €21 682, €17 864, €15 637, €30 061, €12 776, and €16 263, respectively). In the bio-exposed population, compared with adalimumab, ozanimod, tofacitinib, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab, upadacitinib demonstrated again a more effective (QALY gains: 0.784, 0.697, 0.514, 0.723, and 0.719, respectively) and cost-effective profile (ICERs: €16 396, €13 661, €17 074, €10 975, and €13 881, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Upadacitinib was estimated to be the most effective and cost-effective treatment among all advanced treatments for moderately to severely active UC in Greece.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 101091"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Upadacitinib in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis in Greece\",\"authors\":\"Charalampos Tzanetakos MSc ,&nbsp;Marina Psarra MSc ,&nbsp;Ilias Kotsis MSc ,&nbsp;George Gourzoulidis MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of upadacitinib in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC), who have had an inadequate response, lost response, or were intolerant to either conventional therapy (bio-naïve) or a biologic agent (bio-exposed), in Greece.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cost-effectiveness model, consisting of an 8-week decision tree model (induction period) and a long-term Markov state-transition model with a 4-week cycle length (maintenance period), was locally adapted from a public payer perspective over the patient’s lifetime. Upadacitinib was compared with other UC marketed biologics and small molecule agents in Greece. Clinical and utility data were retrieved from published literature. Direct costs pertaining to drug acquisition, administration, disease management, and adverse events were considered in the analysis. All cost inputs were indexed to 2023 euros. Model outcomes were patients’ quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the bio-naïve population, compared with adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, ozanimod, tofacitinib, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab, upadacitinib was found to be more effective (QALY gains: 0.833, 0.670, 0.671, 0.783, 0.314, 0.577, and 0.522, respectively) and cost-effective (ICERs: €18 618, €21 682, €17 864, €15 637, €30 061, €12 776, and €16 263, respectively). In the bio-exposed population, compared with adalimumab, ozanimod, tofacitinib, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab, upadacitinib demonstrated again a more effective (QALY gains: 0.784, 0.697, 0.514, 0.723, and 0.719, respectively) and cost-effective profile (ICERs: €16 396, €13 661, €17 074, €10 975, and €13 881, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Upadacitinib was estimated to be the most effective and cost-effective treatment among all advanced treatments for moderately to severely active UC in Greece.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"volume\":\"46 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109925000160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109925000160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估upadacitinib在希腊中度至重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者中的成本效益,这些患者对常规治疗(bio-naïve)或生物制剂(生物暴露)有不充分的反应,失去反应或不耐受。方法采用成本-效果模型,包括8周的决策树模型(诱导期)和4周周期长度的长期马尔可夫状态转移模型(维持期),从公共支付方的角度对患者终生进行局部调整。Upadacitinib与其他UC在希腊上市的生物制剂和小分子药物进行了比较。临床和效用数据从已发表的文献中检索。在分析中考虑了与药物获取、管理、疾病管理和不良事件有关的直接成本。所有成本投入均以2023欧元为基准。模型结果为患者的质量调整生命年(QALYs)、总成本和增量成本-效果比(ICERs)。结果在bio-naïve人群中,upadacitinib比阿达木单抗、戈利单抗、英夫利昔单抗、奥扎莫、托法替尼、乌斯特金单抗和维多单抗更有效(QALY增益分别为0.833、0.670、0.671、0.783、0.314、0.577和0.522),性价比更高(ICERs分别为€18 618、€21 682、€17 864、€15 637、€30 061、€12 776和€16 263)。在生物暴露人群中,与阿达木单抗、ozanimod、tofacitinib、ustekinumab和vedolizumab相比,upadacitinib再次显示出更有效(QALY收益分别为0.784、0.697、0.514、0.723和0.719)和更具成本效益(ICERs分别为16 396欧元、13 661欧元、17 074欧元、10 975欧元和13 881欧元)。结论在希腊,supadacitinib被认为是中重度活动性UC的所有先进治疗中最有效和最具成本效益的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Upadacitinib in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis in Greece

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of upadacitinib in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC), who have had an inadequate response, lost response, or were intolerant to either conventional therapy (bio-naïve) or a biologic agent (bio-exposed), in Greece.

Methods

A cost-effectiveness model, consisting of an 8-week decision tree model (induction period) and a long-term Markov state-transition model with a 4-week cycle length (maintenance period), was locally adapted from a public payer perspective over the patient’s lifetime. Upadacitinib was compared with other UC marketed biologics and small molecule agents in Greece. Clinical and utility data were retrieved from published literature. Direct costs pertaining to drug acquisition, administration, disease management, and adverse events were considered in the analysis. All cost inputs were indexed to 2023 euros. Model outcomes were patients’ quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

Results

In the bio-naïve population, compared with adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, ozanimod, tofacitinib, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab, upadacitinib was found to be more effective (QALY gains: 0.833, 0.670, 0.671, 0.783, 0.314, 0.577, and 0.522, respectively) and cost-effective (ICERs: €18 618, €21 682, €17 864, €15 637, €30 061, €12 776, and €16 263, respectively). In the bio-exposed population, compared with adalimumab, ozanimod, tofacitinib, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab, upadacitinib demonstrated again a more effective (QALY gains: 0.784, 0.697, 0.514, 0.723, and 0.719, respectively) and cost-effective profile (ICERs: €16 396, €13 661, €17 074, €10 975, and €13 881, respectively).

Conclusions

Upadacitinib was estimated to be the most effective and cost-effective treatment among all advanced treatments for moderately to severely active UC in Greece.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in health regional issues
Value in health regional issues Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信