追踪创业溢出效应:来自美国州小企业信贷倡议和Kickstarter的证据

IF 8 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Ouafaa Hmaddi , Lauren Lanahan , Alex Murray
{"title":"追踪创业溢出效应:来自美国州小企业信贷倡议和Kickstarter的证据","authors":"Ouafaa Hmaddi ,&nbsp;Lauren Lanahan ,&nbsp;Alex Murray","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper delves into the multi-faceted relationship between large-scale institutional programs designed to alleviate financial constraints for small businesses and their extended impact on surrounding entrepreneurial ecosystems. We explore if and how entrepreneurial spillovers may occur through different channels which collectively stimulate market competition, promote latent ideas, and influence resource allocation for early-stage entrepreneurial activity. We contribute to the measurement of entrepreneurial spillovers by tracing the often-overlooked aspect of failed entrepreneurial outcomes, while also tracing successes. In addition, we unpack how, where, and when such spillovers occur. By leveraging the staggered entry of the US State Small Business Credit Initiative, we estimate the differential effect of program entry on Kickstarter activity at the US county level. We report positive and economically meaningful spillovers across the range of successful and failed outcomes. Moreover, we find that increasing the scope of disbursement from the large-scale institutional program (i.e., disbursement of smaller funding rations to more small business recipients) rather than scale (i.e., disbursement of larger funding rations to fewer small business recipients) accelerates entrepreneurial spillovers; we identify a complementary effect for counties with greater resource endowments; and we identify various lags of impact (i.e., a two-year lag for failed outcomes and three-year lag for successful outcomes) attesting to dynamic trends in timing of the spillover return. This study contributes to the literature on spillovers from large-scale institutional programs and offers implications for practice and policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 4","pages":"Article 105197"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracing entrepreneurial spillovers: Evidence from the U.S. State Small Business Credit initiative and Kickstarter\",\"authors\":\"Ouafaa Hmaddi ,&nbsp;Lauren Lanahan ,&nbsp;Alex Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper delves into the multi-faceted relationship between large-scale institutional programs designed to alleviate financial constraints for small businesses and their extended impact on surrounding entrepreneurial ecosystems. We explore if and how entrepreneurial spillovers may occur through different channels which collectively stimulate market competition, promote latent ideas, and influence resource allocation for early-stage entrepreneurial activity. We contribute to the measurement of entrepreneurial spillovers by tracing the often-overlooked aspect of failed entrepreneurial outcomes, while also tracing successes. In addition, we unpack how, where, and when such spillovers occur. By leveraging the staggered entry of the US State Small Business Credit Initiative, we estimate the differential effect of program entry on Kickstarter activity at the US county level. We report positive and economically meaningful spillovers across the range of successful and failed outcomes. Moreover, we find that increasing the scope of disbursement from the large-scale institutional program (i.e., disbursement of smaller funding rations to more small business recipients) rather than scale (i.e., disbursement of larger funding rations to fewer small business recipients) accelerates entrepreneurial spillovers; we identify a complementary effect for counties with greater resource endowments; and we identify various lags of impact (i.e., a two-year lag for failed outcomes and three-year lag for successful outcomes) attesting to dynamic trends in timing of the spillover return. This study contributes to the literature on spillovers from large-scale institutional programs and offers implications for practice and policy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Policy\",\"volume\":\"54 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 105197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325000265\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325000265","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文深入研究了旨在缓解小企业融资约束的大型制度项目及其对周边创业生态系统的延伸影响之间的多方面关系。我们探讨了创业溢出是否以及如何通过不同的渠道发生,这些渠道共同刺激了市场竞争,促进了潜在的想法,并影响了早期创业活动的资源配置。我们通过追踪失败的创业结果中经常被忽视的方面,同时也追踪成功的方面,为创业溢出效应的测量做出贡献。此外,我们还分析了这种溢出效应是如何、在何处以及何时发生的。通过利用美国州小企业信贷计划的交错进入,我们估计了美国县级项目进入Kickstarter活动的差异效应。我们报告了一系列成功和失败结果的积极和有经济意义的溢出效应。此外,我们发现,增加大规模机构计划的支付范围(即向更多的小企业接受者支付较小的资金配额)而不是规模(即向更少的小企业接受者支付较大的资金配额)加速了创业溢出效应;我们发现资源禀赋较大的县存在互补效应;我们还确定了各种影响滞后(即,失败结果滞后两年,成功结果滞后三年),证明了溢出回归时间的动态趋势。本研究对大规模制度项目溢出效应的研究文献有所贡献,并为实践和政策提供启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracing entrepreneurial spillovers: Evidence from the U.S. State Small Business Credit initiative and Kickstarter
This paper delves into the multi-faceted relationship between large-scale institutional programs designed to alleviate financial constraints for small businesses and their extended impact on surrounding entrepreneurial ecosystems. We explore if and how entrepreneurial spillovers may occur through different channels which collectively stimulate market competition, promote latent ideas, and influence resource allocation for early-stage entrepreneurial activity. We contribute to the measurement of entrepreneurial spillovers by tracing the often-overlooked aspect of failed entrepreneurial outcomes, while also tracing successes. In addition, we unpack how, where, and when such spillovers occur. By leveraging the staggered entry of the US State Small Business Credit Initiative, we estimate the differential effect of program entry on Kickstarter activity at the US county level. We report positive and economically meaningful spillovers across the range of successful and failed outcomes. Moreover, we find that increasing the scope of disbursement from the large-scale institutional program (i.e., disbursement of smaller funding rations to more small business recipients) rather than scale (i.e., disbursement of larger funding rations to fewer small business recipients) accelerates entrepreneurial spillovers; we identify a complementary effect for counties with greater resource endowments; and we identify various lags of impact (i.e., a two-year lag for failed outcomes and three-year lag for successful outcomes) attesting to dynamic trends in timing of the spillover return. This study contributes to the literature on spillovers from large-scale institutional programs and offers implications for practice and policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信