链接环境影响评价与正能量区:文献综述

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Rosaria Volpe , Adriano Bisello , Andreas Tuerk , Francesco Guarino , Emanuela Giancola , Maria Nuria Sanchez , Giovanni Tumminia , Elisa Marrasso , Giovanna Pallotta , Emanuele Cutore , Maurizio Cellura , Alberto Fichera , Sonia Longo , Carlo Roselli , Maurizio Sasso , Xiaojin Zhang , Ilaria Marotta , Alberto Brunetti , Roberta Rincione , Francesco Reda
{"title":"链接环境影响评价与正能量区:文献综述","authors":"Rosaria Volpe ,&nbsp;Adriano Bisello ,&nbsp;Andreas Tuerk ,&nbsp;Francesco Guarino ,&nbsp;Emanuela Giancola ,&nbsp;Maria Nuria Sanchez ,&nbsp;Giovanni Tumminia ,&nbsp;Elisa Marrasso ,&nbsp;Giovanna Pallotta ,&nbsp;Emanuele Cutore ,&nbsp;Maurizio Cellura ,&nbsp;Alberto Fichera ,&nbsp;Sonia Longo ,&nbsp;Carlo Roselli ,&nbsp;Maurizio Sasso ,&nbsp;Xiaojin Zhang ,&nbsp;Ilaria Marotta ,&nbsp;Alberto Brunetti ,&nbsp;Roberta Rincione ,&nbsp;Francesco Reda","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research delves into the environmental impact assessment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), focusing on comparative analyses of methodologies, key performance indicators, and an array of both theoretical and practical case studies. The literature review uncovers the strengths and weaknesses inherent current evaluation practices. The study reveals critical gaps in current assessment frameworks, particularly regarding the application to PEDs. It highlights the necessity for a holistic approach to PED evaluation, incorporating diverse energy sources and consumption patterns to fully understand their impact. The research advocates for the integration of multiple environmental factors in terms of innovative design and technology in PEDs, tailored to enhance both functionality and sustainability. It calls for the development of standardized guidelines and the learning from successful implementations to ensure the resilience and effectiveness of PEDs over time. Thus, this review paper aims to contribute to the body of knowledge on PEDs, offering insights and recommendations for future developments in this critical area of sustainable urban and energy planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100264"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking environmental impact assessment and Positive Energy Districts: A literature review\",\"authors\":\"Rosaria Volpe ,&nbsp;Adriano Bisello ,&nbsp;Andreas Tuerk ,&nbsp;Francesco Guarino ,&nbsp;Emanuela Giancola ,&nbsp;Maria Nuria Sanchez ,&nbsp;Giovanni Tumminia ,&nbsp;Elisa Marrasso ,&nbsp;Giovanna Pallotta ,&nbsp;Emanuele Cutore ,&nbsp;Maurizio Cellura ,&nbsp;Alberto Fichera ,&nbsp;Sonia Longo ,&nbsp;Carlo Roselli ,&nbsp;Maurizio Sasso ,&nbsp;Xiaojin Zhang ,&nbsp;Ilaria Marotta ,&nbsp;Alberto Brunetti ,&nbsp;Roberta Rincione ,&nbsp;Francesco Reda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This research delves into the environmental impact assessment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), focusing on comparative analyses of methodologies, key performance indicators, and an array of both theoretical and practical case studies. The literature review uncovers the strengths and weaknesses inherent current evaluation practices. The study reveals critical gaps in current assessment frameworks, particularly regarding the application to PEDs. It highlights the necessity for a holistic approach to PED evaluation, incorporating diverse energy sources and consumption patterns to fully understand their impact. The research advocates for the integration of multiple environmental factors in terms of innovative design and technology in PEDs, tailored to enhance both functionality and sustainability. It calls for the development of standardized guidelines and the learning from successful implementations to ensure the resilience and effectiveness of PEDs over time. Thus, this review paper aims to contribute to the body of knowledge on PEDs, offering insights and recommendations for future developments in this critical area of sustainable urban and energy planning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789425000108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789425000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对正能量区环境影响评价进行了深入研究,重点对方法、关键绩效指标进行了比较分析,并进行了一系列理论和实践案例研究。文献综述揭示了当前评估实践固有的优势和劣势。该研究揭示了当前评估框架的重大差距,特别是在对ped的应用方面。报告强调必须采取全面的方法来评价环境发展项目,包括各种能源和消费模式,以充分了解其影响。该研究提倡在ped的创新设计和技术方面整合多种环境因素,以增强功能和可持续性。它要求制定标准化的指导方针,并从成功的实施中学习,以确保儿童发展战略的弹性和有效性。因此,这篇综述论文的目的是为ped的知识体系做出贡献,为可持续城市和能源规划这一关键领域的未来发展提供见解和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linking environmental impact assessment and Positive Energy Districts: A literature review
This research delves into the environmental impact assessment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), focusing on comparative analyses of methodologies, key performance indicators, and an array of both theoretical and practical case studies. The literature review uncovers the strengths and weaknesses inherent current evaluation practices. The study reveals critical gaps in current assessment frameworks, particularly regarding the application to PEDs. It highlights the necessity for a holistic approach to PED evaluation, incorporating diverse energy sources and consumption patterns to fully understand their impact. The research advocates for the integration of multiple environmental factors in terms of innovative design and technology in PEDs, tailored to enhance both functionality and sustainability. It calls for the development of standardized guidelines and the learning from successful implementations to ensure the resilience and effectiveness of PEDs over time. Thus, this review paper aims to contribute to the body of knowledge on PEDs, offering insights and recommendations for future developments in this critical area of sustainable urban and energy planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信