社会规范在退休储蓄中的作用:来自两个自然实地实验的证据

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Trond Døskeland, Jareef Bin Martuza, Lars Jacob Tynes Pedersen , Francisco Santos, Hallgeir Sjåstad, Helge Thorbjørnsen
{"title":"社会规范在退休储蓄中的作用:来自两个自然实地实验的证据","authors":"Trond Døskeland,&nbsp;Jareef Bin Martuza,&nbsp;Lars Jacob Tynes Pedersen ,&nbsp;Francisco Santos,&nbsp;Hallgeir Sjåstad,&nbsp;Helge Thorbjørnsen","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Under-saving for retirement is a challenge for society, businesses, and individuals. Therefore, behavioral interventions that promote saving are valuable for economic and social well-being. Previous research demonstrates that retirement saving can be influenced by social-psychological mechanisms such as peer effects and norms. However, few large-scale experiments have investigated the role of different types of social norms in boosting retirement savings. Even fewer studies have examined how the time-framing (e.g., focusing on the present choice of saving vs. the future benefits of current saving) of such norms influences behavior. This paper provides real-life experimental evidence on the effects of (1) descriptive vs. injunctive norms on retirement saving behavior across two stages of the decision-making process (information search and saving behavior), and (2) the time-framing of such norms. Specifically, we conduct two large-scale field experiments on Norway-based bank customers in their online user interface, testing the effects of different norm messages on actual saving behavior. Study 1 (N = 455,509) finds that although injunctive (vs. descriptive) norms lead to higher click-through rates, descriptive norms are more effective than injunctive norms in increasing actual retirement savings. In essence, information about what most other people do (descriptive norms) was more effective in changing behavior than expert opinion on what one should do (injunctive norms). In Study 2 (N = 224,000), we vary descriptive norms across two saving schemes in a 2 (descriptive norm: present-focused vs. future-focused) X 2 (scheme: save-more-tomorrow vs. save-more-today) design. We find stronger effects of present-focused descriptive norms than future-focused descriptive norms in general, driven by differences in the save-more-today scheme. Effect sizes were generally small, but economically meaningful due to the low intervention costs of large-scale implementation. As a whole, our findings broaden the understanding of how social norms and their time-framing influence long-term saving behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 115201"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of social norms in retirement saving: Evidence from two natural field experiments\",\"authors\":\"Trond Døskeland,&nbsp;Jareef Bin Martuza,&nbsp;Lars Jacob Tynes Pedersen ,&nbsp;Francisco Santos,&nbsp;Hallgeir Sjåstad,&nbsp;Helge Thorbjørnsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Under-saving for retirement is a challenge for society, businesses, and individuals. Therefore, behavioral interventions that promote saving are valuable for economic and social well-being. Previous research demonstrates that retirement saving can be influenced by social-psychological mechanisms such as peer effects and norms. However, few large-scale experiments have investigated the role of different types of social norms in boosting retirement savings. Even fewer studies have examined how the time-framing (e.g., focusing on the present choice of saving vs. the future benefits of current saving) of such norms influences behavior. This paper provides real-life experimental evidence on the effects of (1) descriptive vs. injunctive norms on retirement saving behavior across two stages of the decision-making process (information search and saving behavior), and (2) the time-framing of such norms. Specifically, we conduct two large-scale field experiments on Norway-based bank customers in their online user interface, testing the effects of different norm messages on actual saving behavior. Study 1 (N = 455,509) finds that although injunctive (vs. descriptive) norms lead to higher click-through rates, descriptive norms are more effective than injunctive norms in increasing actual retirement savings. In essence, information about what most other people do (descriptive norms) was more effective in changing behavior than expert opinion on what one should do (injunctive norms). In Study 2 (N = 224,000), we vary descriptive norms across two saving schemes in a 2 (descriptive norm: present-focused vs. future-focused) X 2 (scheme: save-more-tomorrow vs. save-more-today) design. We find stronger effects of present-focused descriptive norms than future-focused descriptive norms in general, driven by differences in the save-more-today scheme. Effect sizes were generally small, but economically meaningful due to the low intervention costs of large-scale implementation. As a whole, our findings broaden the understanding of how social norms and their time-framing influence long-term saving behavior.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000244\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000244","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

退休储蓄不足对社会、企业和个人来说都是一个挑战。因此,促进储蓄的行为干预对经济和社会福祉是有价值的。以往的研究表明,退休储蓄会受到同伴效应和规范等社会心理机制的影响。然而,很少有大规模的实验调查不同类型的社会规范在提高退休储蓄中的作用。甚至更少的研究考察了这些规范的时间框架(例如,关注当前储蓄的选择与当前储蓄的未来收益)如何影响行为。本文提供了现实生活中的实验证据,证明:(1)描述性规范与禁令性规范对决策过程中两个阶段(信息搜索和储蓄行为)的退休储蓄行为的影响,以及(2)这些规范的时间框架。具体而言,我们在挪威银行客户的在线用户界面上进行了两次大规模的现场实验,测试了不同规范信息对实际储蓄行为的影响。研究1 (N = 455,509)发现,尽管禁令规范(相对于描述性规范)导致更高的点击率,但描述性规范在增加实际退休储蓄方面比禁令规范更有效。本质上,关于大多数人做什么的信息(描述性规范)比关于一个人应该做什么的专家意见(禁令性规范)在改变行为方面更有效。在研究2 (N = 224,000)中,我们在2(描述规范:现在关注vs未来关注)x2(方案:明天多存vs今天多存)设计中改变了两种储蓄方案的描述规范。我们发现,一般来说,以现在为中心的描述性规范比以未来为中心的描述性规范的效果更强,这是由“多今天节约”图式的差异所驱动的。效应量通常较小,但由于大规模实施的干预成本较低,因此具有经济意义。总的来说,我们的发现拓宽了对社会规范及其时间框架如何影响长期储蓄行为的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of social norms in retirement saving: Evidence from two natural field experiments
Under-saving for retirement is a challenge for society, businesses, and individuals. Therefore, behavioral interventions that promote saving are valuable for economic and social well-being. Previous research demonstrates that retirement saving can be influenced by social-psychological mechanisms such as peer effects and norms. However, few large-scale experiments have investigated the role of different types of social norms in boosting retirement savings. Even fewer studies have examined how the time-framing (e.g., focusing on the present choice of saving vs. the future benefits of current saving) of such norms influences behavior. This paper provides real-life experimental evidence on the effects of (1) descriptive vs. injunctive norms on retirement saving behavior across two stages of the decision-making process (information search and saving behavior), and (2) the time-framing of such norms. Specifically, we conduct two large-scale field experiments on Norway-based bank customers in their online user interface, testing the effects of different norm messages on actual saving behavior. Study 1 (N = 455,509) finds that although injunctive (vs. descriptive) norms lead to higher click-through rates, descriptive norms are more effective than injunctive norms in increasing actual retirement savings. In essence, information about what most other people do (descriptive norms) was more effective in changing behavior than expert opinion on what one should do (injunctive norms). In Study 2 (N = 224,000), we vary descriptive norms across two saving schemes in a 2 (descriptive norm: present-focused vs. future-focused) X 2 (scheme: save-more-tomorrow vs. save-more-today) design. We find stronger effects of present-focused descriptive norms than future-focused descriptive norms in general, driven by differences in the save-more-today scheme. Effect sizes were generally small, but economically meaningful due to the low intervention costs of large-scale implementation. As a whole, our findings broaden the understanding of how social norms and their time-framing influence long-term saving behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信