地理科学虚拟实地体验教学研究

IF 11.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Steven Semken, Chris Mead, Kristen Foley, Thomas Ruberto, Geoffrey Bruce, Ariel D. Anbar
{"title":"地理科学虚拟实地体验教学研究","authors":"Steven Semken, Chris Mead, Kristen Foley, Thomas Ruberto, Geoffrey Bruce, Ariel D. Anbar","doi":"10.1146/annurev-earth-060923-115406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Field experiences are highly valued in geoscience education. However, logistical, financial, and accessibility challenges associated with fieldwork and rapid advancements in technology have all prompted geoscience educators to explore virtual field experiences (VFEs) as alternatives. Rigorous assessment of the effectiveness of VFEs has not kept pace with their implementation, but recent studies offer meaningful and actionable findings that can inform ongoing and future use of VFEs in geoscience education. We present a review of selected studies that address three significant aspects of this still-evolving modality. First, we examine current characterization and classification of VFEs. Second, we examine studies that evaluate the effectiveness of teaching with VFEs. Third, we extend this review to studies that compare VFEs with in-person field experiences (IPFEs). The studies we review demonstrate that VFEs are a valuable approach to teaching introductory geoscience content, even compared to IPFEs. <jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item> <jats:label>▪</jats:label> Challenges associated with field geoscience education and improvements in technology have led geoscience educators to develop and implement virtual field experiences (VFEs) as teaching tools. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> <jats:label>▪</jats:label> VFEs are tested, practical, and effective alternatives to in-person field experiences in introductory geoscience education. </jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":8034,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on Teaching Geoscience with Virtual Field Experiences\",\"authors\":\"Steven Semken, Chris Mead, Kristen Foley, Thomas Ruberto, Geoffrey Bruce, Ariel D. Anbar\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-earth-060923-115406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Field experiences are highly valued in geoscience education. However, logistical, financial, and accessibility challenges associated with fieldwork and rapid advancements in technology have all prompted geoscience educators to explore virtual field experiences (VFEs) as alternatives. Rigorous assessment of the effectiveness of VFEs has not kept pace with their implementation, but recent studies offer meaningful and actionable findings that can inform ongoing and future use of VFEs in geoscience education. We present a review of selected studies that address three significant aspects of this still-evolving modality. First, we examine current characterization and classification of VFEs. Second, we examine studies that evaluate the effectiveness of teaching with VFEs. Third, we extend this review to studies that compare VFEs with in-person field experiences (IPFEs). The studies we review demonstrate that VFEs are a valuable approach to teaching introductory geoscience content, even compared to IPFEs. <jats:list list-type=\\\"bullet\\\"> <jats:list-item> <jats:label>▪</jats:label> Challenges associated with field geoscience education and improvements in technology have led geoscience educators to develop and implement virtual field experiences (VFEs) as teaching tools. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> <jats:label>▪</jats:label> VFEs are tested, practical, and effective alternatives to in-person field experiences in introductory geoscience education. </jats:list-item> </jats:list>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060923-115406\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060923-115406","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实地经验在地球科学教育中是非常重要的。然而,与实地考察和技术的快速进步相关的后勤、财务和可及性挑战,都促使地球科学教育工作者探索虚拟实地体验(vfe)作为替代方案。对VFEs有效性的严格评估并没有跟上其实施的步伐,但最近的研究提供了有意义和可操作的发现,可以为目前和未来在地球科学教育中使用VFEs提供信息。我们提出了一些研究的综述,这些研究涉及这一仍在发展的模式的三个重要方面。首先,我们研究了目前vfe的表征和分类。其次,我们考察了评估视频教学效果的研究。第三,我们将这一综述扩展到比较VFEs和现场体验(IPFEs)的研究。我们回顾的研究表明,即使与IPFEs相比,VFEs也是一种有价值的教授入门地球科学内容的方法。▪与现场地球科学教育相关的挑战和技术的进步促使地球科学教育工作者开发和实施虚拟现场体验(vfe)作为教学工具。在入门地球科学教育中,vfe是经过测试的、实用的、有效的实地体验的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on Teaching Geoscience with Virtual Field Experiences
Field experiences are highly valued in geoscience education. However, logistical, financial, and accessibility challenges associated with fieldwork and rapid advancements in technology have all prompted geoscience educators to explore virtual field experiences (VFEs) as alternatives. Rigorous assessment of the effectiveness of VFEs has not kept pace with their implementation, but recent studies offer meaningful and actionable findings that can inform ongoing and future use of VFEs in geoscience education. We present a review of selected studies that address three significant aspects of this still-evolving modality. First, we examine current characterization and classification of VFEs. Second, we examine studies that evaluate the effectiveness of teaching with VFEs. Third, we extend this review to studies that compare VFEs with in-person field experiences (IPFEs). The studies we review demonstrate that VFEs are a valuable approach to teaching introductory geoscience content, even compared to IPFEs. Challenges associated with field geoscience education and improvements in technology have led geoscience educators to develop and implement virtual field experiences (VFEs) as teaching tools. VFEs are tested, practical, and effective alternatives to in-person field experiences in introductory geoscience education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 地学天文-地球科学综合
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 1973, the Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences has been dedicated to providing comprehensive coverage of advancements in the field. This esteemed publication examines various aspects of earth and planetary sciences, encompassing climate, environment, geological hazards, planet formation, and the evolution of life. To ensure wider accessibility, the latest volume of the journal has transitioned from a gated model to open access through the Subscribe to Open program by Annual Reviews. Consequently, all articles published in this volume are now available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信