与采用最新的国家阴道镜检查指南相关的临床医生特征。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000877
Lindsay Fuzzell, Naomi C Brownstein, Holly B Fontenot, Paige Lake, Alexandra Michel, Rebecca B Perkins, Susan T Vadaparampil
{"title":"与采用最新的国家阴道镜检查指南相关的临床医生特征。","authors":"Lindsay Fuzzell, Naomi C Brownstein, Holly B Fontenot, Paige Lake, Alexandra Michel, Rebecca B Perkins, Susan T Vadaparampil","doi":"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate adherence to the 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines for management of patients following colpscopic cervical biopsy among US colposcopists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To elucidate factors associated with utilization of the 2019 guidelines for patients undergoing colposcopic cervical biopsy, the authors cross-sectionally surveyed physicians and advanced practice professionals who perform colposcopy. Clinicians responded to clinical vignettes describing scenarios for which management recommendations differed between 2019 and prior management guidelines. Vignette 1 involved deferral of repeat colposcopy for patients with a low-risk biopsy, HPV, and cytology results. Vignette 2 involved deferral of excisional treatment on a patient with repeated low-grade biopsy results. Binomial logistic regression models determined factors associated with utilization of 2019 guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 670 colposcopists participated from across the United States. For Vignettes 1 and 2, guideline-adherent responses were given by 30.5% and 66.1% of participants, respectively. Colpsocopists practicing in community health centers were more likely to perform guideline-concordant care for Vignettes 1 and 2. Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic colposcopists and Internal or Family medicine compared to OB-GYN colposcopists are less likely to perform guideline-concordant care in Vignette 2. Irrespective of their chosen response, most believed they were guideline-adherent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many colposcopists may not realize their current management strategies are inconsistent with 2019 guidelines. Tailored education initiatives could address knowledge gaps, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms.</p>","PeriodicalId":50160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","volume":" ","pages":"153-160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinician Characteristics Associated With Adoption of Updated National Colposcopy Guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay Fuzzell, Naomi C Brownstein, Holly B Fontenot, Paige Lake, Alexandra Michel, Rebecca B Perkins, Susan T Vadaparampil\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate adherence to the 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines for management of patients following colpscopic cervical biopsy among US colposcopists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To elucidate factors associated with utilization of the 2019 guidelines for patients undergoing colposcopic cervical biopsy, the authors cross-sectionally surveyed physicians and advanced practice professionals who perform colposcopy. Clinicians responded to clinical vignettes describing scenarios for which management recommendations differed between 2019 and prior management guidelines. Vignette 1 involved deferral of repeat colposcopy for patients with a low-risk biopsy, HPV, and cytology results. Vignette 2 involved deferral of excisional treatment on a patient with repeated low-grade biopsy results. Binomial logistic regression models determined factors associated with utilization of 2019 guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 670 colposcopists participated from across the United States. For Vignettes 1 and 2, guideline-adherent responses were given by 30.5% and 66.1% of participants, respectively. Colpsocopists practicing in community health centers were more likely to perform guideline-concordant care for Vignettes 1 and 2. Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic colposcopists and Internal or Family medicine compared to OB-GYN colposcopists are less likely to perform guideline-concordant care in Vignette 2. Irrespective of their chosen response, most believed they were guideline-adherent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many colposcopists may not realize their current management strategies are inconsistent with 2019 guidelines. Tailored education initiatives could address knowledge gaps, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"153-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000877\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000877","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估美国阴道镜医师对2019年ASCCP基于风险的管理共识指南的依从性,该指南适用于阴道镜宫颈活检患者的管理。方法:为了阐明2019年阴道镜宫颈活检患者使用指南的相关因素,我们对进行阴道镜检查的医生和高级执业专业人员进行了横断面调查。临床医生对描述2019年管理建议与先前管理指南不同情景的临床小短文做出了回应。小插曲1涉及低风险活检、HPV和细胞学结果的患者推迟重复阴道镜检查。小插曲2涉及延迟对反复低分级活检结果的患者的切除治疗。二项逻辑回归模型确定了与2019年指南使用相关的因素。结果:共有670名来自美国各地的阴道镜检查师参与。对于小片段1和2,分别有30.5%和66.1%的参与者给出了遵循指南的反应。在社区卫生中心执业的心理医生更有可能在小图1和小图2中执行符合指南的护理。与非西班牙裔阴道镜医生相比,西班牙裔和内科或家庭医学的阴道镜医生相比,妇产科阴道镜医生更不可能执行符合指南的护理。不管他们选择的回答是什么,大多数人都认为自己是遵循指导方针的。结论:许多阴道镜医生可能没有意识到他们目前的管理策略与2019年指南不一致。量身定制的教育举措可以解决知识差距问题,使患者受益最大化,危害最小化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinician Characteristics Associated With Adoption of Updated National Colposcopy Guidelines.

Objective: To evaluate adherence to the 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines for management of patients following colpscopic cervical biopsy among US colposcopists.

Methods: To elucidate factors associated with utilization of the 2019 guidelines for patients undergoing colposcopic cervical biopsy, the authors cross-sectionally surveyed physicians and advanced practice professionals who perform colposcopy. Clinicians responded to clinical vignettes describing scenarios for which management recommendations differed between 2019 and prior management guidelines. Vignette 1 involved deferral of repeat colposcopy for patients with a low-risk biopsy, HPV, and cytology results. Vignette 2 involved deferral of excisional treatment on a patient with repeated low-grade biopsy results. Binomial logistic regression models determined factors associated with utilization of 2019 guidelines.

Results: A total of 670 colposcopists participated from across the United States. For Vignettes 1 and 2, guideline-adherent responses were given by 30.5% and 66.1% of participants, respectively. Colpsocopists practicing in community health centers were more likely to perform guideline-concordant care for Vignettes 1 and 2. Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic colposcopists and Internal or Family medicine compared to OB-GYN colposcopists are less likely to perform guideline-concordant care in Vignette 2. Irrespective of their chosen response, most believed they were guideline-adherent.

Conclusions: Many colposcopists may not realize their current management strategies are inconsistent with 2019 guidelines. Tailored education initiatives could address knowledge gaps, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the source for the latest science about benign and malignant conditions of the cervix, vagina, vulva, and anus. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original research original research that addresses prevalence, causes, mechanisms, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of lower genital tract disease. We publish clinical guidelines, position papers, cost-effectiveness analyses, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews, including meta-analyses. We also publish papers about research and reporting methods, opinions about controversial medical issues. Of particular note, we encourage material in any of the above mentioned categories that is related to improving patient care, avoiding medical errors, and comparative effectiveness research. We encourage publication of evidence-based guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, and decision aids. Original research and reviews may be sub-classified according to topic: cervix and HPV, vulva and vagina, perianal and anal, basic science, and education and learning. The scope and readership of the journal extend to several disciplines: gynecology, internal medicine, family practice, dermatology, physical therapy, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, sex therapy, and pharmacology. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease highlights needs for future research, and enhances health care. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the official journal of the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy, and sponsored by the Australian Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the Society of Canadian Colposcopists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信