代谢和减肥手术前后患者的社交媒体使用:一项系统综述。

Afton M Koball, Elizabeth Dougherty, Taylor B Stanley, Gail A Kerver, Karen B Grothe, Matthew M Clark, Omar M Ghanem, Christi A Patten, Sean Phelan, Scott G Engel
{"title":"代谢和减肥手术前后患者的社交媒体使用:一项系统综述。","authors":"Afton M Koball, Elizabeth Dougherty, Taylor B Stanley, Gail A Kerver, Karen B Grothe, Matthew M Clark, Omar M Ghanem, Christi A Patten, Sean Phelan, Scott G Engel","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2024.12.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social media (SM) use among individuals before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has dramatically increased in recent years, yet the benefits and risks to patients remain unclear. This systematic review sought to synthesize the literature on SM use among individuals pre- and post-MBS. Objectives were to: 1) explore the patterns of SM use in this population, 2) identify the benefits and risks of MBS-focused SM use, and 3) inform clinicians and patients about strategies to more effectively engage with MBS-focused SM. This systematic review was conducted according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023473191). Studies which included a retrospective or prospective examination of SM and MBS were included. A comprehensive search was performed and published scientific articles were examined by three independent reviewers, resulting in 24 full text articles meeting inclusion criteria based on prespecified selection criteria. Results are reported by SM platform including Facebook, YouTube, Online Forums/Websites, X (formerly \"Twitter\"), Instagram, and TikTok. Findings indicate that SM use among individuals pre- and post-MBS is high and Facebook is the preferred platform. Several benefits of SM use were identified including easier access to large peer support communities, inspiration and encouragement, and easy access to health information. Possible downsides to SM use include problems with the accuracy of MBS content on SM. Given these findings, MBS clinicians can use this information to inform their patients about strategies to promote benefits and reduce potential risks of SM use.</p>","PeriodicalId":94216,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social media use among patients before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Afton M Koball, Elizabeth Dougherty, Taylor B Stanley, Gail A Kerver, Karen B Grothe, Matthew M Clark, Omar M Ghanem, Christi A Patten, Sean Phelan, Scott G Engel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soard.2024.12.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Social media (SM) use among individuals before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has dramatically increased in recent years, yet the benefits and risks to patients remain unclear. This systematic review sought to synthesize the literature on SM use among individuals pre- and post-MBS. Objectives were to: 1) explore the patterns of SM use in this population, 2) identify the benefits and risks of MBS-focused SM use, and 3) inform clinicians and patients about strategies to more effectively engage with MBS-focused SM. This systematic review was conducted according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023473191). Studies which included a retrospective or prospective examination of SM and MBS were included. A comprehensive search was performed and published scientific articles were examined by three independent reviewers, resulting in 24 full text articles meeting inclusion criteria based on prespecified selection criteria. Results are reported by SM platform including Facebook, YouTube, Online Forums/Websites, X (formerly \\\"Twitter\\\"), Instagram, and TikTok. Findings indicate that SM use among individuals pre- and post-MBS is high and Facebook is the preferred platform. Several benefits of SM use were identified including easier access to large peer support communities, inspiration and encouragement, and easy access to health information. Possible downsides to SM use include problems with the accuracy of MBS content on SM. Given these findings, MBS clinicians can use this information to inform their patients about strategies to promote benefits and reduce potential risks of SM use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2024.12.022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2024.12.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,在代谢和减肥手术(MBS)前后,个人使用社交媒体(SM)的人数急剧增加,但对患者的益处和风险仍不清楚。本系统综述旨在综合mbs前后个体SM使用的文献。目的是:1)探索该人群的SM使用模式,2)确定以mbs为重点的SM使用的益处和风险,以及3)告知临床医生和患者更有效地参与以mbs为重点的SM的策略。本系统评价按照2020年系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目进行,并在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023473191)。纳入了对SM和MBS进行回顾性或前瞻性检查的研究。我们进行了全面的检索,并由三名独立的审稿人对已发表的科学文章进行了审查,最终得出24篇全文文章符合基于预先指定的选择标准的纳入标准。结果由包括Facebook、YouTube、在线论坛/网站、X(以前的“Twitter”)、Instagram和TikTok在内的SM平台报告。研究结果表明,mbs前后个体的SM使用率较高,Facebook是首选平台。确定了使用SM的几个好处,包括更容易获得大型同伴支持社区、启发和鼓励以及更容易获得健康信息。使用SM可能的缺点包括SM上MBS内容的准确性问题。鉴于这些发现,MBS临床医生可以利用这些信息告知他们的患者有关策略,以促进益处和减少使用SM的潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social media use among patients before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery: a systematic review.

Social media (SM) use among individuals before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has dramatically increased in recent years, yet the benefits and risks to patients remain unclear. This systematic review sought to synthesize the literature on SM use among individuals pre- and post-MBS. Objectives were to: 1) explore the patterns of SM use in this population, 2) identify the benefits and risks of MBS-focused SM use, and 3) inform clinicians and patients about strategies to more effectively engage with MBS-focused SM. This systematic review was conducted according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023473191). Studies which included a retrospective or prospective examination of SM and MBS were included. A comprehensive search was performed and published scientific articles were examined by three independent reviewers, resulting in 24 full text articles meeting inclusion criteria based on prespecified selection criteria. Results are reported by SM platform including Facebook, YouTube, Online Forums/Websites, X (formerly "Twitter"), Instagram, and TikTok. Findings indicate that SM use among individuals pre- and post-MBS is high and Facebook is the preferred platform. Several benefits of SM use were identified including easier access to large peer support communities, inspiration and encouragement, and easy access to health information. Possible downsides to SM use include problems with the accuracy of MBS content on SM. Given these findings, MBS clinicians can use this information to inform their patients about strategies to promote benefits and reduce potential risks of SM use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信