Janice Chan, Nicholas Jackson, Arianna Gonzalez Rebollar, Cynthia Santana, Giselle Perez de la Garza, Tannaz Moin, Jennifer K Yee, Estelle Everett
{"title":"青少年1型糖尿病患者自我监测血糖和持续血糖监测与医疗补助保险的关系","authors":"Janice Chan, Nicholas Jackson, Arianna Gonzalez Rebollar, Cynthia Santana, Giselle Perez de la Garza, Tannaz Moin, Jennifer K Yee, Estelle Everett","doi":"10.2337/dc24-2224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and Medicaid must demonstrate they have self-monitored their blood glucose level at least four times daily to receive continuous glucose monitors (CGMs). New California Medicaid policies eliminated this requirement and, thus, CGM access has increased. This study examines whether infrequent baseline self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) checks result in suboptimal outcomes or nonadherence with CGM use.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included youth with T1D and Medicaid who started CGM after January 2019, when newer models no longer needed calibration, at two large health care systems. Patients were stratified by data on baseline SMBG frequency (<4 vs. ≥4 checks daily) collected at the clinic visit prior to starting CGM. Differences between SMBG groups in CGM adherence and HbA1c over time were assessed by a mixed-effects linear regression model and fixed-effect interaction term. Patients were surveyed to explore individual impact of CGM on diabetes management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We followed 78 youth for 6 months. CGM adherence was similar between SMBG frequency groups at 3 months (68.7% vs. 68.4%; P = 0.97) and sustained at 6 months. HbA1c values improved in both groups at 3 months, with a larger improvement in those with SMBG <4 daily checks (1.3% vs. 0.4%), and sustained at 6 months. Patient surveys (n = 35) reported high engagement with CGM and increased insulin boluses after initiation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients using CGM demonstrated improvement in HbA1c regardless of prior SMBG. Increased engagement with CGM likely promoted increased insulin boluses. Therefore, restriction of CGM to those with SMBG ≥4 daily checks is an unnecessary barrier, excluding those who could potentially benefit the most.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"632-638"},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Self-Monitored Blood Glucose and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes and Medicaid Insurance.\",\"authors\":\"Janice Chan, Nicholas Jackson, Arianna Gonzalez Rebollar, Cynthia Santana, Giselle Perez de la Garza, Tannaz Moin, Jennifer K Yee, Estelle Everett\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/dc24-2224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and Medicaid must demonstrate they have self-monitored their blood glucose level at least four times daily to receive continuous glucose monitors (CGMs). New California Medicaid policies eliminated this requirement and, thus, CGM access has increased. This study examines whether infrequent baseline self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) checks result in suboptimal outcomes or nonadherence with CGM use.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included youth with T1D and Medicaid who started CGM after January 2019, when newer models no longer needed calibration, at two large health care systems. Patients were stratified by data on baseline SMBG frequency (<4 vs. ≥4 checks daily) collected at the clinic visit prior to starting CGM. Differences between SMBG groups in CGM adherence and HbA1c over time were assessed by a mixed-effects linear regression model and fixed-effect interaction term. Patients were surveyed to explore individual impact of CGM on diabetes management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We followed 78 youth for 6 months. CGM adherence was similar between SMBG frequency groups at 3 months (68.7% vs. 68.4%; P = 0.97) and sustained at 6 months. HbA1c values improved in both groups at 3 months, with a larger improvement in those with SMBG <4 daily checks (1.3% vs. 0.4%), and sustained at 6 months. Patient surveys (n = 35) reported high engagement with CGM and increased insulin boluses after initiation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients using CGM demonstrated improvement in HbA1c regardless of prior SMBG. Increased engagement with CGM likely promoted increased insulin boluses. Therefore, restriction of CGM to those with SMBG ≥4 daily checks is an unnecessary barrier, excluding those who could potentially benefit the most.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"632-638\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081318/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-2224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-2224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:患有1型糖尿病(T1D)和医疗补助的青年必须证明他们每天至少自我监测血糖水平四次,才能接受连续血糖监测仪(cgm)。新的加州医疗补助政策取消了这一要求,因此,获得CGM的机会增加了。本研究探讨了不频繁的基线自我监测血糖(SMBG)检查是否会导致不理想的结果或不坚持使用CGM。研究设计和方法:本回顾性研究包括2019年1月以后在两个大型医疗保健系统开始CGM的T1D和Medicaid青年,当时新模型不再需要校准。根据基线SMBG频率数据对患者进行分层(结果:我们对78名青年进行了6个月的随访。3个月时,SMBG频率组的CGM依从性相似(68.7 vs 68.4%;P = 0.97),并持续6个月。两组患者的HbA1c值在3个月时均有改善,其中伴有SMBG的患者改善更大。结论:无论是否有SMBG,使用CGM的患者HbA1c均有改善。增加与CGM的接触可能会增加胰岛素剂量。因此,将CGM限制在每日SMBG≥4次的患者是一个不必要的障碍,排除了那些可能受益最大的患者。
Association Between Self-Monitored Blood Glucose and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes and Medicaid Insurance.
Objective: Youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and Medicaid must demonstrate they have self-monitored their blood glucose level at least four times daily to receive continuous glucose monitors (CGMs). New California Medicaid policies eliminated this requirement and, thus, CGM access has increased. This study examines whether infrequent baseline self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) checks result in suboptimal outcomes or nonadherence with CGM use.
Research design and methods: This retrospective study included youth with T1D and Medicaid who started CGM after January 2019, when newer models no longer needed calibration, at two large health care systems. Patients were stratified by data on baseline SMBG frequency (<4 vs. ≥4 checks daily) collected at the clinic visit prior to starting CGM. Differences between SMBG groups in CGM adherence and HbA1c over time were assessed by a mixed-effects linear regression model and fixed-effect interaction term. Patients were surveyed to explore individual impact of CGM on diabetes management.
Results: We followed 78 youth for 6 months. CGM adherence was similar between SMBG frequency groups at 3 months (68.7% vs. 68.4%; P = 0.97) and sustained at 6 months. HbA1c values improved in both groups at 3 months, with a larger improvement in those with SMBG <4 daily checks (1.3% vs. 0.4%), and sustained at 6 months. Patient surveys (n = 35) reported high engagement with CGM and increased insulin boluses after initiation.
Conclusions: Patients using CGM demonstrated improvement in HbA1c regardless of prior SMBG. Increased engagement with CGM likely promoted increased insulin boluses. Therefore, restriction of CGM to those with SMBG ≥4 daily checks is an unnecessary barrier, excluding those who could potentially benefit the most.