Paediatric & neonatal pain Pub Date : 2024-12-16 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1002/pne2.12132
Dani Hall, Tadgh Moriarty, Damian Roland, Ronan O'Sullivan, Carol Blackburn, Stuart Hartshorn, Shrouk Messahel, Mark D Lyttle
{"title":"The Landscape of Pediatric Procedural Sedation in the United Kingdom and Irish Emergency Departments; an International Survey Study.","authors":"Dani Hall, Tadgh Moriarty, Damian Roland, Ronan O'Sullivan, Carol Blackburn, Stuart Hartshorn, Shrouk Messahel, Mark D Lyttle","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Approximately 250 000 children undergo pediatric procedural sedation (PPS) in Emergency Departments (ED) in the United Kingdom and Ireland annually. PPS practice in our setting has not been described as fully as other high-income countries. We aimed to evaluate PPS in EDs in the United Kingdom and Ireland. An online survey was distributed through Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland (PERUKI), in June 2020. One respondent per ED completed the survey, including questions on agents, fasting, training, and governance. Of 72 PERUKI sites, 61 (85%) responded, of which PPS was performed in 50 (82%). Internal training packages existed in under half (22/50, 44.0%). Most had a guideline (43/50; 86.0%) and documentation proforma (39/50; 78.0%). Audit databases existed in 24/50 (48.0%). Intravenous ketamine was the most common agent (43/50; 86%), followed by variable concentration nitrous oxide (13/50; 26%). Fasting practices varied widely across sites and agents. We have demonstrated widespread PPS use, but non-standardized practice. This leads to potential issues of risk and variability across agents, highlighting a need for a sedation package in the United Kingdom and Ireland to standardize practice and data collection. We propose development of a prospective ED sedation registry in the United Kingdom and Ireland to facilitate data collection to support research within this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":94166,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","volume":"7 1","pages":"e12132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在英国和爱尔兰,每年约有 25 万名儿童在急诊科(ED)接受儿科手术镇静(PPS)治疗。与其他高收入国家相比,我国的 PPS 实践尚未得到充分描述。我们旨在评估英国和爱尔兰急诊科的 PPS 情况。2020 年 6 月,我们通过英国和爱尔兰儿科急诊研究 (PERUKI) 发布了一份在线调查。每个急诊室有一名受访者完成了调查,其中包括关于药剂、禁食、培训和管理的问题。在 72 个 PERUKI 研究机构中,有 61 个(85%)做出了回复,其中 50 个(82%)开展了 PPS 研究。不到一半的机构(22/50,44.0%)有内部培训包。大多数机构制定了指南(43/50;86.0%)和文件模板(39/50;78.0%)。24/50(48.0%)拥有审计数据库。静脉注射氯胺酮是最常见的药物(43/50;86%),其次是不同浓度的氧化亚氮(13/50;26%)。不同地点和不同药剂的禁食做法大相径庭。我们已经证明了 PPS 的广泛使用,但却没有标准化的实践。这导致了潜在的风险问题和不同药剂之间的差异,突出表明英国和爱尔兰需要一套镇静方案来规范实践和数据收集。我们建议在英国和爱尔兰建立前瞻性急诊室镇静登记处,以促进数据收集,支持该领域的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Landscape of Pediatric Procedural Sedation in the United Kingdom and Irish Emergency Departments; an International Survey Study.

Approximately 250 000 children undergo pediatric procedural sedation (PPS) in Emergency Departments (ED) in the United Kingdom and Ireland annually. PPS practice in our setting has not been described as fully as other high-income countries. We aimed to evaluate PPS in EDs in the United Kingdom and Ireland. An online survey was distributed through Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland (PERUKI), in June 2020. One respondent per ED completed the survey, including questions on agents, fasting, training, and governance. Of 72 PERUKI sites, 61 (85%) responded, of which PPS was performed in 50 (82%). Internal training packages existed in under half (22/50, 44.0%). Most had a guideline (43/50; 86.0%) and documentation proforma (39/50; 78.0%). Audit databases existed in 24/50 (48.0%). Intravenous ketamine was the most common agent (43/50; 86%), followed by variable concentration nitrous oxide (13/50; 26%). Fasting practices varied widely across sites and agents. We have demonstrated widespread PPS use, but non-standardized practice. This leads to potential issues of risk and variability across agents, highlighting a need for a sedation package in the United Kingdom and Ireland to standardize practice and data collection. We propose development of a prospective ED sedation registry in the United Kingdom and Ireland to facilitate data collection to support research within this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信