C. González Enguita , L. López Martín , L.M. Herranz Fernández , B. Sinues Ojas , C. Barrera Rodríguez , J. Extramiana Cameno , J. Campá Bortoló , J.M. Oscá García , M. Perán Teruel , V. Gimeno Argente , A. Navarro Beltrán , E. López Alcina , I. Povo Martín , Y. Salvador Pallás Costa , A. Budía Alba , J. Ortiz Salvador , J.J. Salgado Plonski , P. Suárez Sal , M. Fernández Arjona
{"title":"多中心研究Urolift®植入治疗下尿路继发于良性前列腺增生的患者的影响","authors":"C. González Enguita , L. López Martín , L.M. Herranz Fernández , B. Sinues Ojas , C. Barrera Rodríguez , J. Extramiana Cameno , J. Campá Bortoló , J.M. Oscá García , M. Perán Teruel , V. Gimeno Argente , A. Navarro Beltrán , E. López Alcina , I. Povo Martín , Y. Salvador Pallás Costa , A. Budía Alba , J. Ortiz Salvador , J.J. Salgado Plonski , P. Suárez Sal , M. Fernández Arjona","doi":"10.1016/j.acuroe.2025.501708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>UroLift® is a minimally invasive treatment for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of UroLift® system treatment on quality of life. Secondary objectives assessed the impact on urinary symptoms and sexual function.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Patients at 7 Spanish hospitals undergoing pharmacological treatment were offered the choice to continue this treatment or accept surgical intervention. The primary outcome, impact on quality of life, was assessed using the EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire. Secondary outcomes, including impact on symptoms, erectile function, and ejaculatory function, were evaluated using the IPSS, SHIM-5, and MSHQ-EjD-SF questionnaires, respectively. Outcomes were compared between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>91 patients chose UroLift® and 45 continued with pharmacotherapy. At 6 months, a positive impact on quality of life was estimated with UroLift® (0.046; SD: 0.02; p = 0.067), being significant in subgroups of patients aged >65 years (diff.: 0.034), PSA > 2.2 (diff.: 0.108), diabetes mellitus (diff.: 0.023), hypertension (diff.: 0.011) or hypercholesterolemia (diff.: 0.016). The impact on symptomatology was superior with UroLift® (−10.07; SD: 1.65; p < 0.001), being significant in subgroups aged >65 (diff.: 1.37), prostate >40 cc (diff.: 0.74), PSA > 2.2 (diff.: 2.63), and diabetes mellitus (diff.: 1.66), hypertension (diff.: 1.23). Erectile function was not affected (-0.33; SD: 1.99; p = 0.868) while ejaculatory function showed a favorable impact (2.98; SD: 1.26; p = 0.019).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Minimally invasive Urolift® system treatment is associated with a positive impact on quality of life and urinary symptoms without adversely affecting sexual function.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94291,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"49 4","pages":"Article 501708"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter study of the impact of Urolift® implantation in patients undergoing medical treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia\",\"authors\":\"C. González Enguita , L. López Martín , L.M. Herranz Fernández , B. Sinues Ojas , C. Barrera Rodríguez , J. Extramiana Cameno , J. Campá Bortoló , J.M. Oscá García , M. Perán Teruel , V. Gimeno Argente , A. Navarro Beltrán , E. López Alcina , I. Povo Martín , Y. Salvador Pallás Costa , A. Budía Alba , J. Ortiz Salvador , J.J. Salgado Plonski , P. Suárez Sal , M. Fernández Arjona\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acuroe.2025.501708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>UroLift® is a minimally invasive treatment for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of UroLift® system treatment on quality of life. Secondary objectives assessed the impact on urinary symptoms and sexual function.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Patients at 7 Spanish hospitals undergoing pharmacological treatment were offered the choice to continue this treatment or accept surgical intervention. The primary outcome, impact on quality of life, was assessed using the EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire. Secondary outcomes, including impact on symptoms, erectile function, and ejaculatory function, were evaluated using the IPSS, SHIM-5, and MSHQ-EjD-SF questionnaires, respectively. Outcomes were compared between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>91 patients chose UroLift® and 45 continued with pharmacotherapy. At 6 months, a positive impact on quality of life was estimated with UroLift® (0.046; SD: 0.02; p = 0.067), being significant in subgroups of patients aged >65 years (diff.: 0.034), PSA > 2.2 (diff.: 0.108), diabetes mellitus (diff.: 0.023), hypertension (diff.: 0.011) or hypercholesterolemia (diff.: 0.016). The impact on symptomatology was superior with UroLift® (−10.07; SD: 1.65; p < 0.001), being significant in subgroups aged >65 (diff.: 1.37), prostate >40 cc (diff.: 0.74), PSA > 2.2 (diff.: 2.63), and diabetes mellitus (diff.: 1.66), hypertension (diff.: 1.23). Erectile function was not affected (-0.33; SD: 1.99; p = 0.868) while ejaculatory function showed a favorable impact (2.98; SD: 1.26; p = 0.019).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Minimally invasive Urolift® system treatment is associated with a positive impact on quality of life and urinary symptoms without adversely affecting sexual function.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actas urologicas espanolas\",\"volume\":\"49 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 501708\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actas urologicas espanolas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173578625000241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173578625000241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multicenter study of the impact of Urolift® implantation in patients undergoing medical treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia
Introduction and objectives
UroLift® is a minimally invasive treatment for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of UroLift® system treatment on quality of life. Secondary objectives assessed the impact on urinary symptoms and sexual function.
Patients and methods
Patients at 7 Spanish hospitals undergoing pharmacological treatment were offered the choice to continue this treatment or accept surgical intervention. The primary outcome, impact on quality of life, was assessed using the EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire. Secondary outcomes, including impact on symptoms, erectile function, and ejaculatory function, were evaluated using the IPSS, SHIM-5, and MSHQ-EjD-SF questionnaires, respectively. Outcomes were compared between groups.
Results
91 patients chose UroLift® and 45 continued with pharmacotherapy. At 6 months, a positive impact on quality of life was estimated with UroLift® (0.046; SD: 0.02; p = 0.067), being significant in subgroups of patients aged >65 years (diff.: 0.034), PSA > 2.2 (diff.: 0.108), diabetes mellitus (diff.: 0.023), hypertension (diff.: 0.011) or hypercholesterolemia (diff.: 0.016). The impact on symptomatology was superior with UroLift® (−10.07; SD: 1.65; p < 0.001), being significant in subgroups aged >65 (diff.: 1.37), prostate >40 cc (diff.: 0.74), PSA > 2.2 (diff.: 2.63), and diabetes mellitus (diff.: 1.66), hypertension (diff.: 1.23). Erectile function was not affected (-0.33; SD: 1.99; p = 0.868) while ejaculatory function showed a favorable impact (2.98; SD: 1.26; p = 0.019).
Conclusions
Minimally invasive Urolift® system treatment is associated with a positive impact on quality of life and urinary symptoms without adversely affecting sexual function.