人主动脉沿其长度和周长的层特异性撕裂特性的变化:对剥离起始的空间易感性的含义。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Dimitrios P Sokolis
{"title":"人主动脉沿其长度和周长的层特异性撕裂特性的变化:对剥离起始的空间易感性的含义。","authors":"Dimitrios P Sokolis","doi":"10.1115/1.4067912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hemodynamic variations influence the location of entry tears in aortic dissection. This study investigates whether variations in tear strength across the human aorta contribute to these clinical manifestations. Circumferential and axial strips were collected from nine axial and two circumferential sites along each autopsied aorta, yielding 1188 samples (11 aortas × 18 sites × 2 directions × 3 layers per site). These samples underwent tear testing to assess tear strength and tear energy, constituting resistance to tear propagation. Adventitial tear parameters were significantly higher than those of the intima and media, with no significant differences between the latter two, supporting the observation that entry tears typically occur in the inner wall. Tear propagation angles were approximately 15 and 75 deg for circumferential and axial medial strips, and 30 and 45 deg for circumferential and axial strips of the intima and adventitia, with minimal variation along the aorta. These findings indicate that the media, and to a lesser extent the other layers, have higher resistance to axial tearing compared to circumferential tearing, aligning with the clinical observation of circumferentially directed tears. Intimal and adventitial tear parameters increased modestly along the aorta, while medial parameters varied less, explaining why entry tears rarely originate in the abdominal aorta. Tear parameters in inner and outer quadrants were similar at most axial locations, except for dissimilar tear propagation angles of the intima and adventitia in the proximal aorta (especially the arch), explaining why entry tears seldom involve the entire circumference.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in Layer-Specific Tear Properties of the Human Aorta Along Its Length and Circumference: Implications for Spatial Susceptibility to Dissection Initiation.\",\"authors\":\"Dimitrios P Sokolis\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4067912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hemodynamic variations influence the location of entry tears in aortic dissection. This study investigates whether variations in tear strength across the human aorta contribute to these clinical manifestations. Circumferential and axial strips were collected from nine axial and two circumferential sites along each autopsied aorta, yielding 1188 samples (11 aortas × 18 sites × 2 directions × 3 layers per site). These samples underwent tear testing to assess tear strength and tear energy, constituting resistance to tear propagation. Adventitial tear parameters were significantly higher than those of the intima and media, with no significant differences between the latter two, supporting the observation that entry tears typically occur in the inner wall. Tear propagation angles were approximately 15 and 75 deg for circumferential and axial medial strips, and 30 and 45 deg for circumferential and axial strips of the intima and adventitia, with minimal variation along the aorta. These findings indicate that the media, and to a lesser extent the other layers, have higher resistance to axial tearing compared to circumferential tearing, aligning with the clinical observation of circumferentially directed tears. Intimal and adventitial tear parameters increased modestly along the aorta, while medial parameters varied less, explaining why entry tears rarely originate in the abdominal aorta. Tear parameters in inner and outer quadrants were similar at most axial locations, except for dissimilar tear propagation angles of the intima and adventitia in the proximal aorta (especially the arch), explaining why entry tears seldom involve the entire circumference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4067912\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4067912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血流动力学变化影响主动脉夹层进入性撕裂的位置。本研究调查了人类主动脉撕裂强度的变化是否与这些临床表现有关。在每条解剖主动脉的9个轴向部位和2个周向部位采集周向和轴向条带,共获得1188份样本(11条主动脉× 18个部位× 2个方向×每个部位3层)。这些样品进行了撕裂测试,以评估撕裂强度和撕裂能量,构成对撕裂传播的阻力。外膜撕裂参数明显高于内膜和中膜撕裂参数,后两者之间无显著差异,支持进入性撕裂通常发生在内壁的观察。撕裂传播角在内膜和外膜的周向和轴向条带上约为15度和75度,在内膜和外膜的周向和轴向条带上约为30度和45度,沿主动脉变化最小。这些发现表明,与周向撕裂相比,介质和其他层(在较小程度上)具有更高的轴向撕裂阻力,这与临床观察的周向撕裂一致。内膜和外膜撕裂参数沿主动脉缓慢增加,而内侧参数变化较小,这解释了为什么进入性撕裂很少起源于腹主动脉。除了近端主动脉内膜和外膜(尤其是弓)的撕裂传播角度不同外,内外象限的撕裂参数在大多数轴向位置相似,这解释了为什么进入性撕裂很少涉及整个圆周。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variation in Layer-Specific Tear Properties of the Human Aorta Along Its Length and Circumference: Implications for Spatial Susceptibility to Dissection Initiation.

Hemodynamic variations influence the location of entry tears in aortic dissection. This study investigates whether variations in tear strength across the human aorta contribute to these clinical manifestations. Circumferential and axial strips were collected from nine axial and two circumferential sites along each autopsied aorta, yielding 1188 samples (11 aortas × 18 sites × 2 directions × 3 layers per site). These samples underwent tear testing to assess tear strength and tear energy, constituting resistance to tear propagation. Adventitial tear parameters were significantly higher than those of the intima and media, with no significant differences between the latter two, supporting the observation that entry tears typically occur in the inner wall. Tear propagation angles were approximately 15 and 75 deg for circumferential and axial medial strips, and 30 and 45 deg for circumferential and axial strips of the intima and adventitia, with minimal variation along the aorta. These findings indicate that the media, and to a lesser extent the other layers, have higher resistance to axial tearing compared to circumferential tearing, aligning with the clinical observation of circumferentially directed tears. Intimal and adventitial tear parameters increased modestly along the aorta, while medial parameters varied less, explaining why entry tears rarely originate in the abdominal aorta. Tear parameters in inner and outer quadrants were similar at most axial locations, except for dissimilar tear propagation angles of the intima and adventitia in the proximal aorta (especially the arch), explaining why entry tears seldom involve the entire circumference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信