comtrans问卷的心理测量学评价。

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Supianto
{"title":"comtrans问卷的心理测量学评价。","authors":"Supianto","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2024.2442645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study critiques the development of the CommTrans Questionnaire, designed to assess communication preferences for transgender and gender-diverse individuals in healthcare. The critique highlights methodology and participant engagement limitations, suggesting a more inclusive approach that considers intersectional experiences and participatory design. By adopting a broader perspective and including further validation, this review aims to enhance the effectiveness of the CommTrans Questionnaire as an adaptable tool for patient-centered communication in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Evaluation of the CommTrans Questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Supianto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00918369.2024.2442645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study critiques the development of the CommTrans Questionnaire, designed to assess communication preferences for transgender and gender-diverse individuals in healthcare. The critique highlights methodology and participant engagement limitations, suggesting a more inclusive approach that considers intersectional experiences and participatory design. By adopting a broader perspective and including further validation, this review aims to enhance the effectiveness of the CommTrans Questionnaire as an adaptable tool for patient-centered communication in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2024.2442645\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2024.2442645","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究批评了comtrans问卷的发展,该问卷旨在评估医疗保健中跨性别者和性别多样化个体的沟通偏好。该评论强调了方法论和参与者参与的局限性,建议采用更具包容性的方法,考虑交叉经验和参与式设计。通过采用更广泛的视角并包括进一步的验证,本综述旨在提高CommTrans问卷作为临床环境中以患者为中心的沟通工具的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric Evaluation of the CommTrans Questionnaire.

This study critiques the development of the CommTrans Questionnaire, designed to assess communication preferences for transgender and gender-diverse individuals in healthcare. The critique highlights methodology and participant engagement limitations, suggesting a more inclusive approach that considers intersectional experiences and participatory design. By adopting a broader perspective and including further validation, this review aims to enhance the effectiveness of the CommTrans Questionnaire as an adaptable tool for patient-centered communication in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信