用于法医鉴定的DNA定量分析,在干血中,与新鲜血液相比较的带有血迹的唾液。初步研究。

Q3 Medicine
Kangan Manjunathan, Radhika Manoj Bavle, Mrinalini Menon, Reshma Venugopal, Soumya Makarla, Sankha Nair
{"title":"用于法医鉴定的DNA定量分析,在干血中,与新鲜血液相比较的带有血迹的唾液。初步研究。","authors":"Kangan Manjunathan, Radhika Manoj Bavle, Mrinalini Menon, Reshma Venugopal, Soumya Makarla, Sankha Nair","doi":"10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_137_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The important tenet of forensic science is personal identification based on DNA studies. The use of DNA has changed the specificity and sensitivity of victim identity tests associated with criminology, trauma, and natural disasters in Forensic Science. Blood is a proven source of DNA quantification for these analyses. The use of saliva, which can be acquired more easily in a simple and atraumatic method is gaining preference; as some of its advantages include - collection of larger sample numbers, easy replication of tests in duplicates and triplicates, and repetitions if advocated, can easily be performed. Though it yields a comparatively slightly lesser quantity of DNA, some of the samples - like dried blood and blood-tinged saliva, have the potential to be used in forensic sciences and provide a better result than simple saliva. Such samples are valuable sources of genetic material that can be utilized in crime and forensic investigations. The present study is one of few studies to be explored in this sphere as very few studies using blood-tinged saliva and dried blood have been conducted so far.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To determine if blood-tinged saliva or dried blood yields a good amount of DNA. To compare it with fresh blood samples for authentication.</p><p><strong>Materials and methodology: </strong>The study groups: Group A - <i>n</i> = 20 normal blood samples, Group B - <i>n</i> = 20 of saliva-tinged blood samples and Group C - Dried Blood samples from the same subjects. DNA was isolated from these 60 samples using Xplorogen DNA isolation and extraction kit. The quality and quantity of DNA isolation were determined using a spectrophotometric technique using a Biospectrometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The extracted DNA was quantified and the yield was 83.3 ± 9.4, 55.1 ± 7.4, and 73.4 ± 8.7 μg/ml in fresh blood, dried blood, and blood-tinged saliva, respectively. Out of the 60 samples assessed, all 100% samples yielded a sufficiently good DNA content. Extraction from Blood tinged with saliva showed promising results when compared to dried blood and the levels obtained were closely comparable to whole blood (fresh).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blood is a standard sample for ample DNA yields in forensic studies. We conclude in this study, that blood-tinged saliva gives an equally good sample for utilization in DNA detection in those situations where such samples are traced (even at a later date) at the scene of crime, or mass disasters for forensic analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":38846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology","volume":"28 4","pages":"725-730"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11819636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of DNA, in dried blood, saliva tinged with blood in comparision with fresh blood for forensic identification- A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Kangan Manjunathan, Radhika Manoj Bavle, Mrinalini Menon, Reshma Venugopal, Soumya Makarla, Sankha Nair\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_137_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The important tenet of forensic science is personal identification based on DNA studies. The use of DNA has changed the specificity and sensitivity of victim identity tests associated with criminology, trauma, and natural disasters in Forensic Science. Blood is a proven source of DNA quantification for these analyses. The use of saliva, which can be acquired more easily in a simple and atraumatic method is gaining preference; as some of its advantages include - collection of larger sample numbers, easy replication of tests in duplicates and triplicates, and repetitions if advocated, can easily be performed. Though it yields a comparatively slightly lesser quantity of DNA, some of the samples - like dried blood and blood-tinged saliva, have the potential to be used in forensic sciences and provide a better result than simple saliva. Such samples are valuable sources of genetic material that can be utilized in crime and forensic investigations. The present study is one of few studies to be explored in this sphere as very few studies using blood-tinged saliva and dried blood have been conducted so far.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To determine if blood-tinged saliva or dried blood yields a good amount of DNA. To compare it with fresh blood samples for authentication.</p><p><strong>Materials and methodology: </strong>The study groups: Group A - <i>n</i> = 20 normal blood samples, Group B - <i>n</i> = 20 of saliva-tinged blood samples and Group C - Dried Blood samples from the same subjects. DNA was isolated from these 60 samples using Xplorogen DNA isolation and extraction kit. The quality and quantity of DNA isolation were determined using a spectrophotometric technique using a Biospectrometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The extracted DNA was quantified and the yield was 83.3 ± 9.4, 55.1 ± 7.4, and 73.4 ± 8.7 μg/ml in fresh blood, dried blood, and blood-tinged saliva, respectively. Out of the 60 samples assessed, all 100% samples yielded a sufficiently good DNA content. Extraction from Blood tinged with saliva showed promising results when compared to dried blood and the levels obtained were closely comparable to whole blood (fresh).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blood is a standard sample for ample DNA yields in forensic studies. We conclude in this study, that blood-tinged saliva gives an equally good sample for utilization in DNA detection in those situations where such samples are traced (even at a later date) at the scene of crime, or mass disasters for forensic analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"725-730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11819636/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_137_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_137_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法医科学的重要宗旨是基于DNA研究的个人鉴定。DNA的使用改变了法医学中与犯罪学、创伤和自然灾害相关的受害者身份测试的特异性和敏感性。血液是这些分析中DNA定量的可靠来源。唾液的使用更容易以一种简单和无创伤的方法获得,因此越来越受到青睐;由于它的一些优点包括-收集更大的样本数,易于重复和三次重复的测试,如果提倡,可以很容易地进行重复。虽然它产生的DNA数量相对较少,但一些样本,如干血和带血的唾液,有可能用于法医科学,并提供比简单唾液更好的结果。这些样本是遗传物质的宝贵来源,可用于犯罪和法医调查。目前的研究是在这一领域探索的少数研究之一,因为迄今为止很少有研究使用带血的唾液和干血进行。目的和目的:确定带血的唾液或干血是否能产生大量的DNA。将其与新鲜血液样本进行比对以进行鉴定。材料和方法:研究分组:A组- n = 20例正常血液样本,B组- n = 20例带有唾液的血液样本,C组-干血样本。采用Xplorogen DNA分离提取试剂盒对60份样品进行DNA分离。采用生物分光光度法测定DNA分离的质量和数量。结果:提取的DNA定量,在新鲜血液、干血和带血唾液中的得率分别为83.3±9.4、55.1±7.4和73.4±8.7 μg/ml。在评估的60个样本中,所有100%的样本都产生了足够好的DNA含量。与干燥的血液相比,从带有唾液的血液中提取的结果很有希望,所获得的水平与全血(新鲜)非常接近。结论:血液是法医研究中获得大量DNA的标准样本。我们在这项研究中得出的结论是,在犯罪现场或大规模灾难现场进行法医分析时,带血的唾液提供了同样好的DNA检测样本(即使在以后的日期)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quantification of DNA, in dried blood, saliva tinged with blood in comparision with fresh blood for forensic identification- A pilot study.

Quantification of DNA, in dried blood, saliva tinged with blood in comparision with fresh blood for forensic identification- A pilot study.

The important tenet of forensic science is personal identification based on DNA studies. The use of DNA has changed the specificity and sensitivity of victim identity tests associated with criminology, trauma, and natural disasters in Forensic Science. Blood is a proven source of DNA quantification for these analyses. The use of saliva, which can be acquired more easily in a simple and atraumatic method is gaining preference; as some of its advantages include - collection of larger sample numbers, easy replication of tests in duplicates and triplicates, and repetitions if advocated, can easily be performed. Though it yields a comparatively slightly lesser quantity of DNA, some of the samples - like dried blood and blood-tinged saliva, have the potential to be used in forensic sciences and provide a better result than simple saliva. Such samples are valuable sources of genetic material that can be utilized in crime and forensic investigations. The present study is one of few studies to be explored in this sphere as very few studies using blood-tinged saliva and dried blood have been conducted so far.

Aims and objectives: To determine if blood-tinged saliva or dried blood yields a good amount of DNA. To compare it with fresh blood samples for authentication.

Materials and methodology: The study groups: Group A - n = 20 normal blood samples, Group B - n = 20 of saliva-tinged blood samples and Group C - Dried Blood samples from the same subjects. DNA was isolated from these 60 samples using Xplorogen DNA isolation and extraction kit. The quality and quantity of DNA isolation were determined using a spectrophotometric technique using a Biospectrometer.

Results: The extracted DNA was quantified and the yield was 83.3 ± 9.4, 55.1 ± 7.4, and 73.4 ± 8.7 μg/ml in fresh blood, dried blood, and blood-tinged saliva, respectively. Out of the 60 samples assessed, all 100% samples yielded a sufficiently good DNA content. Extraction from Blood tinged with saliva showed promising results when compared to dried blood and the levels obtained were closely comparable to whole blood (fresh).

Conclusion: Blood is a standard sample for ample DNA yields in forensic studies. We conclude in this study, that blood-tinged saliva gives an equally good sample for utilization in DNA detection in those situations where such samples are traced (even at a later date) at the scene of crime, or mass disasters for forensic analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology [ISSN:print-(0973-029X, online-1998-393X)] is a tri-annual journal published on behalf of “The Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists” (IAOMP). The publication of JOMFP was started in the year 1993. The journal publishes papers on a wide spectrum of topics associated with the scope of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, also, ensuring scientific merit and quality. It is a comprehensive reading material for the professionals who want to upgrade their diagnostic skills in Oral Diseases; allows exposure to newer topics and methods of research in the Oral-facial Tissues and Pathology. New features allow an open minded thinking and approach to various pathologies. It also encourages authors to showcase quality work done by them and to compile relevant cases which are diagnostically challenging. The Journal takes pride in maintaining the quality of articles and photomicrographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信