地下护生在面对面、混合和在线密室逃生模式中的体验:塞尔维亚情境下的比较分析。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2025.2464204
Dragana Simin, Vladimir Dolinaj, Nina Brkić-Jovanović, Branislava Brestovački-Svitlica, Dragana Milutinović
{"title":"地下护生在面对面、混合和在线密室逃生模式中的体验:塞尔维亚情境下的比较分析。","authors":"Dragana Simin, Vladimir Dolinaj, Nina Brkić-Jovanović, Branislava Brestovački-Svitlica, Dragana Milutinović","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2025.2464204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Educational escape rooms (EERs) are gamified teaching and learning tools increasingly used in nursing education. This study aims to compare undergraduate nursing students' gameful experiences (GEs) across three EER models: face-to-face, hybrid, and online. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 136 first-year students in a Serbian undergraduate nursing programme. All models EERs had the same narrative, which included several topics from the Fundamentals of Nursing course. Face-to-face and hybrid EERs were implemented in faculty skills laboratories, while the online model used the Zoom® platform. Face-to-face EERs were conducted in 2021/2022. and hybrid and online in the 2022/2023 school year. Immediately after the EER activity, the Gameful Experience Scale (GAMEX) assessed students' GE across six dimensions (Enjoyment, Absorption, Creative Thinking, Activation, Absence of Negative Effects and Dominance). All students solved the puzzles in the allotted time and 'escaped from the room.' Median escape time from face-to-face EER was 39.2 (IQR = 2.1), from online 37.4 (IQR = 4.1), and hybrid 37.2 (IQR = 3.5) minutes. By comparing GE students in three EER models, significant differences were found in five dimensions of the GAMEX scale. Students in face-to-face EER enjoyed significantly more (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and thought more creatively (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while the GE of online model students indicated significantly higher levels of activation (<i>p</i> < 0.001), dominance (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and negative effect (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In the face-to-face and hybrid models, students' GE were more moderate in these dimensions. All EER models can generate positive emotions with moderate negative effects, aligning with the goals of EERs as educational games. Further research is needed to identify the most effective EER model for different areas of nursing education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"30 1","pages":"2464204"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Underground nursing students' experiences in a face-to-face, hybrid, and online escape room model: a comparative analysis in Serbian context.\",\"authors\":\"Dragana Simin, Vladimir Dolinaj, Nina Brkić-Jovanović, Branislava Brestovački-Svitlica, Dragana Milutinović\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10872981.2025.2464204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Educational escape rooms (EERs) are gamified teaching and learning tools increasingly used in nursing education. This study aims to compare undergraduate nursing students' gameful experiences (GEs) across three EER models: face-to-face, hybrid, and online. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 136 first-year students in a Serbian undergraduate nursing programme. All models EERs had the same narrative, which included several topics from the Fundamentals of Nursing course. Face-to-face and hybrid EERs were implemented in faculty skills laboratories, while the online model used the Zoom® platform. Face-to-face EERs were conducted in 2021/2022. and hybrid and online in the 2022/2023 school year. Immediately after the EER activity, the Gameful Experience Scale (GAMEX) assessed students' GE across six dimensions (Enjoyment, Absorption, Creative Thinking, Activation, Absence of Negative Effects and Dominance). All students solved the puzzles in the allotted time and 'escaped from the room.' Median escape time from face-to-face EER was 39.2 (IQR = 2.1), from online 37.4 (IQR = 4.1), and hybrid 37.2 (IQR = 3.5) minutes. By comparing GE students in three EER models, significant differences were found in five dimensions of the GAMEX scale. Students in face-to-face EER enjoyed significantly more (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and thought more creatively (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while the GE of online model students indicated significantly higher levels of activation (<i>p</i> < 0.001), dominance (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and negative effect (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In the face-to-face and hybrid models, students' GE were more moderate in these dimensions. All EER models can generate positive emotions with moderate negative effects, aligning with the goals of EERs as educational games. Further research is needed to identify the most effective EER model for different areas of nursing education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education Online\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"2464204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834819/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2464204\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2464204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育密室(EERs)是一种游戏化的教学工具,越来越多地应用于护理教育中。本研究旨在比较护理本科学生在面对面、混合和在线三种EER模式下的游戏体验。对136名塞尔维亚本科护理专业的一年级学生进行了横断面研究。所有模型eer都有相同的叙述,其中包括护理基础课程的几个主题。面对面和混合EERs在教师技能实验室实施,而在线模型使用Zoom®平台。面对面EERs于2021/2022年进行。2022/2023学年的混合课程和在线课程。在EER活动之后,游戏体验量表(GAMEX)从六个维度(享受、吸收、创造性思维、激活、无负面影响和支配)评估学生的GE。所有学生都在规定的时间内完成了谜题,并“逃离了房间”。面对面EER逃避时间中位数为39.2分钟(IQR = 2.1),在线EER逃避时间中位数为37.4分钟(IQR = 4.1),混合型为37.2分钟(IQR = 3.5)。通过对三种EER模型的GE学生进行比较,发现GAMEX量表的五个维度存在显著差异。面对面学习的学生享受到更多的(p p p p p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Underground nursing students' experiences in a face-to-face, hybrid, and online escape room model: a comparative analysis in Serbian context.

Underground nursing students' experiences in a face-to-face, hybrid, and online escape room model: a comparative analysis in Serbian context.

Underground nursing students' experiences in a face-to-face, hybrid, and online escape room model: a comparative analysis in Serbian context.

Educational escape rooms (EERs) are gamified teaching and learning tools increasingly used in nursing education. This study aims to compare undergraduate nursing students' gameful experiences (GEs) across three EER models: face-to-face, hybrid, and online. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 136 first-year students in a Serbian undergraduate nursing programme. All models EERs had the same narrative, which included several topics from the Fundamentals of Nursing course. Face-to-face and hybrid EERs were implemented in faculty skills laboratories, while the online model used the Zoom® platform. Face-to-face EERs were conducted in 2021/2022. and hybrid and online in the 2022/2023 school year. Immediately after the EER activity, the Gameful Experience Scale (GAMEX) assessed students' GE across six dimensions (Enjoyment, Absorption, Creative Thinking, Activation, Absence of Negative Effects and Dominance). All students solved the puzzles in the allotted time and 'escaped from the room.' Median escape time from face-to-face EER was 39.2 (IQR = 2.1), from online 37.4 (IQR = 4.1), and hybrid 37.2 (IQR = 3.5) minutes. By comparing GE students in three EER models, significant differences were found in five dimensions of the GAMEX scale. Students in face-to-face EER enjoyed significantly more (p < 0.001) and thought more creatively (p < 0.001), while the GE of online model students indicated significantly higher levels of activation (p < 0.001), dominance (p < 0.001), and negative effect (p < 0.001). In the face-to-face and hybrid models, students' GE were more moderate in these dimensions. All EER models can generate positive emotions with moderate negative effects, aligning with the goals of EERs as educational games. Further research is needed to identify the most effective EER model for different areas of nursing education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信