为一个大型水资源回收设施开发工艺模型和生命周期评估,并比较生物固体工艺升级方案。

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Water Science and Technology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.2166/wst.2025.008
Daehyun Ko, John W Norton, Glen T Daigger
{"title":"为一个大型水资源回收设施开发工艺模型和生命周期评估,并比较生物固体工艺升级方案。","authors":"Daehyun Ko, John W Norton, Glen T Daigger","doi":"10.2166/wst.2025.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Life cycle assessment (LCA), coupled with process modeling to develop the life cycle inventory, is a valuable tool to assess differences in environmental performance when evaluating alternatives based on sustainability (triple-bottom-line) principles. Coupled with a whole plant process model (SUMO21), an LCA assessed the environmental performance of options to upgrade biosolids management for the Great Lakes Water Authority water resource recovery facility. All five alternatives evaluated (composting plus four anaerobic digestion alternatives) were able to meet the core objectives of the biosolids management system upgrade: (1) address ageing incinerators, (2) minimize the mass of biosolids landfilled, and (3) reduce greenhouse gas emissions, compared to the existing (baseline) system. The mass of solids to be managed was reduced for the anaerobic digestion alternatives but not for the composting alternatives. Environmental impacts were reduced for the composting alternative for all six impact categories considered (global warming, eutrophication, carcinogenics, ecotoxicity, respiratory effects, and fossil fuel depletion) relative to the baseline, and further reduced for all four anaerobic digestion alternatives evaluated. The results allowed a phased implementation plan to be developed, which could be evaluated based on other factors, such as costs and operational factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":23653,"journal":{"name":"Water Science and Technology","volume":"91 3","pages":"295-310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a process model and life cycle assessment for a large water resource recovery facility and comparison of biosolids process upgrade options.\",\"authors\":\"Daehyun Ko, John W Norton, Glen T Daigger\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wst.2025.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Life cycle assessment (LCA), coupled with process modeling to develop the life cycle inventory, is a valuable tool to assess differences in environmental performance when evaluating alternatives based on sustainability (triple-bottom-line) principles. Coupled with a whole plant process model (SUMO21), an LCA assessed the environmental performance of options to upgrade biosolids management for the Great Lakes Water Authority water resource recovery facility. All five alternatives evaluated (composting plus four anaerobic digestion alternatives) were able to meet the core objectives of the biosolids management system upgrade: (1) address ageing incinerators, (2) minimize the mass of biosolids landfilled, and (3) reduce greenhouse gas emissions, compared to the existing (baseline) system. The mass of solids to be managed was reduced for the anaerobic digestion alternatives but not for the composting alternatives. Environmental impacts were reduced for the composting alternative for all six impact categories considered (global warming, eutrophication, carcinogenics, ecotoxicity, respiratory effects, and fossil fuel depletion) relative to the baseline, and further reduced for all four anaerobic digestion alternatives evaluated. The results allowed a phased implementation plan to be developed, which could be evaluated based on other factors, such as costs and operational factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"91 3\",\"pages\":\"295-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2025.008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2025.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在基于可持续性(三重底线)原则评估替代方案时,生命周期评估(LCA)与开发生命周期清单的过程建模相结合,是评估环境绩效差异的宝贵工具。结合整个工厂过程模型(SUMO21), LCA评估了五大湖水务局水资源回收设施升级生物固体管理方案的环境绩效。与现有(基线)系统相比,评估的所有五种替代方案(堆肥加四种厌氧消化替代方案)都能够满足生物固体管理系统升级的核心目标:(1)解决老化的焚化炉问题;(2)最大限度地减少生物固体填埋量;(3)减少温室气体排放。对于厌氧消化替代品,需要管理的固体质量减少了,但对于堆肥替代品则没有减少。与基线相比,在所考虑的所有六种影响类别(全球变暖、富营养化、致癌物、生态毒性、呼吸效应和化石燃料消耗)中,堆肥替代方案的环境影响均有所降低,所评估的所有四种厌氧消化替代方案的环境影响均进一步降低。这些结果可以制定分阶段实施计划,并根据其他因素(如成本和操作因素)对其进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a process model and life cycle assessment for a large water resource recovery facility and comparison of biosolids process upgrade options.

Life cycle assessment (LCA), coupled with process modeling to develop the life cycle inventory, is a valuable tool to assess differences in environmental performance when evaluating alternatives based on sustainability (triple-bottom-line) principles. Coupled with a whole plant process model (SUMO21), an LCA assessed the environmental performance of options to upgrade biosolids management for the Great Lakes Water Authority water resource recovery facility. All five alternatives evaluated (composting plus four anaerobic digestion alternatives) were able to meet the core objectives of the biosolids management system upgrade: (1) address ageing incinerators, (2) minimize the mass of biosolids landfilled, and (3) reduce greenhouse gas emissions, compared to the existing (baseline) system. The mass of solids to be managed was reduced for the anaerobic digestion alternatives but not for the composting alternatives. Environmental impacts were reduced for the composting alternative for all six impact categories considered (global warming, eutrophication, carcinogenics, ecotoxicity, respiratory effects, and fossil fuel depletion) relative to the baseline, and further reduced for all four anaerobic digestion alternatives evaluated. The results allowed a phased implementation plan to be developed, which could be evaluated based on other factors, such as costs and operational factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Science and Technology
Water Science and Technology 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
366
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: Water Science and Technology publishes peer-reviewed papers on all aspects of the science and technology of water and wastewater. Papers are selected by a rigorous peer review procedure with the aim of rapid and wide dissemination of research results, development and application of new techniques, and related managerial and policy issues. Scientists, engineers, consultants, managers and policy-makers will find this journal essential as a permanent record of progress of research activities and their practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信