Viane Faily, Maria Castro-Codesal, Joanna E MacLean
{"title":"罗宾序列患儿长期无创通气的疗效及预后。","authors":"Viane Faily, Maria Castro-Codesal, Joanna E MacLean","doi":"10.1007/s11325-025-03277-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of children with Robin sequence (RS) using non-invasive ventilation (NIV), including continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure, and to compare these parameters to other children using this technology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a sub-study of a multicenter retrospective 10-year cohort of children using long-term NIV. Children with RS were identified from medical chart review and matched by age, sex, and year of initiation to other children in the cohort. Clinical characteristics, NIV technology, and treatment effect and outcomes were extracted from the medical chart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 622 children in the NIV cohort, 13 had RS and were matched to 39 comparators. Age at NIV initiation and comorbidities did not differ between groups. Use of gastrostomy/nasogastric tubes was higher in children with RS (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.17-7.69). Neither the proportion of children with obstructive sleep apnea or obstructive apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 10 events/h differed between groups. Improvements in respiratory, oxygen, and carbon dioxide parameters between the diagnostic and treatment polysomnography were similar for children with RS and the comparison group. NIV start location was predominantly at home and for used during sleep in both groups. Children with RS used NIV for a median of 1.45 (IQR 1.85) years. The most common reason for stopping NIV in both groups was an improvement in the underlying condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children with RS have similar characteristics and outcomes to other children using NIV. A high proportion of children with RS cease NIV use because of improvements in the underlying primary condition leading to NIV.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":"29 1","pages":"105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and outcomes of long-term non-invasive ventilation in children with Robin sequence.\",\"authors\":\"Viane Faily, Maria Castro-Codesal, Joanna E MacLean\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11325-025-03277-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of children with Robin sequence (RS) using non-invasive ventilation (NIV), including continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure, and to compare these parameters to other children using this technology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a sub-study of a multicenter retrospective 10-year cohort of children using long-term NIV. Children with RS were identified from medical chart review and matched by age, sex, and year of initiation to other children in the cohort. Clinical characteristics, NIV technology, and treatment effect and outcomes were extracted from the medical chart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 622 children in the NIV cohort, 13 had RS and were matched to 39 comparators. Age at NIV initiation and comorbidities did not differ between groups. Use of gastrostomy/nasogastric tubes was higher in children with RS (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.17-7.69). Neither the proportion of children with obstructive sleep apnea or obstructive apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 10 events/h differed between groups. Improvements in respiratory, oxygen, and carbon dioxide parameters between the diagnostic and treatment polysomnography were similar for children with RS and the comparison group. NIV start location was predominantly at home and for used during sleep in both groups. Children with RS used NIV for a median of 1.45 (IQR 1.85) years. The most common reason for stopping NIV in both groups was an improvement in the underlying condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children with RS have similar characteristics and outcomes to other children using NIV. A high proportion of children with RS cease NIV use because of improvements in the underlying primary condition leading to NIV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep and Breathing\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep and Breathing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03277-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03277-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:描述罗宾序列(RS)患儿使用无创通气(NIV)的临床特征和结局,包括持续和双水平气道正压通气,并将这些参数与其他使用该技术的患儿进行比较。方法:本研究是一项多中心回顾性的10年儿童长期使用NIV队列的亚研究。从病历回顾中确定RS患儿,并按年龄、性别和起始年份与队列中的其他患儿相匹配。从病历中提取临床特征、NIV技术、治疗效果和结局。结果:在NIV队列中的622名儿童中,13名患有RS,并与39名比较者相匹配。NIV开始的年龄和合并症在两组之间没有差异。RS患儿胃造口术/鼻胃管的使用率较高(OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.17-7.69)。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停或阻塞性呼吸暂停-低通气指数≥10事件/小时患儿比例组间无差异。在诊断和治疗多导睡眠图中,RS患儿的呼吸、氧气和二氧化碳参数的改善与对照组相似。NIV的起始位置主要在家中,两组在睡眠期间使用。RS患儿使用NIV的中位数为1.45年(IQR为1.85)年。两组患者停止使用NIV的最常见原因是基础疾病的改善。结论:RS患儿与其他使用NIV的患儿具有相似的特点和结局。很大比例的RS患儿停止使用NIV,因为导致NIV的潜在原发性疾病得到改善。
Efficacy and outcomes of long-term non-invasive ventilation in children with Robin sequence.
Purpose: To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of children with Robin sequence (RS) using non-invasive ventilation (NIV), including continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure, and to compare these parameters to other children using this technology.
Methods: This study is a sub-study of a multicenter retrospective 10-year cohort of children using long-term NIV. Children with RS were identified from medical chart review and matched by age, sex, and year of initiation to other children in the cohort. Clinical characteristics, NIV technology, and treatment effect and outcomes were extracted from the medical chart.
Results: From 622 children in the NIV cohort, 13 had RS and were matched to 39 comparators. Age at NIV initiation and comorbidities did not differ between groups. Use of gastrostomy/nasogastric tubes was higher in children with RS (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.17-7.69). Neither the proportion of children with obstructive sleep apnea or obstructive apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 10 events/h differed between groups. Improvements in respiratory, oxygen, and carbon dioxide parameters between the diagnostic and treatment polysomnography were similar for children with RS and the comparison group. NIV start location was predominantly at home and for used during sleep in both groups. Children with RS used NIV for a median of 1.45 (IQR 1.85) years. The most common reason for stopping NIV in both groups was an improvement in the underlying condition.
Conclusions: Children with RS have similar characteristics and outcomes to other children using NIV. A high proportion of children with RS cease NIV use because of improvements in the underlying primary condition leading to NIV.
期刊介绍:
The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep.
Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.