牵引车曳引杆高度对性能的影响及响应面法优化。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Ali Yavuz Şeflek, Nuri Orhan, Mete Özkan
{"title":"牵引车曳引杆高度对性能的影响及响应面法优化。","authors":"Ali Yavuz Şeflek, Nuri Orhan, Mete Özkan","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-88821-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the impact of tractor drawbar height (520, 530 and 540 mm from the ground) on key performance indicators, including pulling force, fuel consumption, pulling power and overall tractor efficiency. Present experiments were conducted on a special pulling power test track under controlled conditions at the Directorate of Agricultural Equipment and Machinery Test Centre of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Data were collected at different tractor forward speeds and performance parameters were modeled and optimized using Response Surface Methodology (RSM), a statistical approach widely used for multi-factor optimization. Present findings revealed that a drawbar height of 520 mm yielded the highest pulling force (47.4 kN) at a speed of 5.48 km h<sup>-1</sup>, while the same height combined with a speed of 8.33 km h<sup>-1</sup> produced the maximum pulling power (78.75 kW) and the lowest specific fuel consumption (267.03 g kWh<sup>-1</sup>). Statistical analysis confirmed that both drawbar height and tractor speed had significant effects on pulling force and fuel consumption (P < 0.05). However, for overall tractor efficiency, only tractor speed showed a significance. The developed RSM models demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with an R² value of 0.98 for pulling force and error metrics such as RMSE of 0.42% for efficiency, highlighting the reliability of the approach. The study concludes that optimizing the drawbar height and tractor speed not only improves pulling performance but also enhances fuel efficiency, offering a practical framework for achieving sustainable agricultural practices. Present findings emphasize the critical role of drawbar height adjustments in minimizing energy losses and maximizing operational efficiency during field operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"5370"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of tractor drawbar height on performance and optimization using response surface methodology.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Yavuz Şeflek, Nuri Orhan, Mete Özkan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-88821-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study explores the impact of tractor drawbar height (520, 530 and 540 mm from the ground) on key performance indicators, including pulling force, fuel consumption, pulling power and overall tractor efficiency. Present experiments were conducted on a special pulling power test track under controlled conditions at the Directorate of Agricultural Equipment and Machinery Test Centre of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Data were collected at different tractor forward speeds and performance parameters were modeled and optimized using Response Surface Methodology (RSM), a statistical approach widely used for multi-factor optimization. Present findings revealed that a drawbar height of 520 mm yielded the highest pulling force (47.4 kN) at a speed of 5.48 km h<sup>-1</sup>, while the same height combined with a speed of 8.33 km h<sup>-1</sup> produced the maximum pulling power (78.75 kW) and the lowest specific fuel consumption (267.03 g kWh<sup>-1</sup>). Statistical analysis confirmed that both drawbar height and tractor speed had significant effects on pulling force and fuel consumption (P < 0.05). However, for overall tractor efficiency, only tractor speed showed a significance. The developed RSM models demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with an R² value of 0.98 for pulling force and error metrics such as RMSE of 0.42% for efficiency, highlighting the reliability of the approach. The study concludes that optimizing the drawbar height and tractor speed not only improves pulling performance but also enhances fuel efficiency, offering a practical framework for achieving sustainable agricultural practices. Present findings emphasize the critical role of drawbar height adjustments in minimizing energy losses and maximizing operational efficiency during field operations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"5370\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825671/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88821-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88821-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了影响拖拉机牵引高度从地面(520、530和540毫米)关键绩效指标,包括拉力、燃料消耗、拖拉机牵引功率和整体效率。目前的实验是在农林部农业装备和机械测试中心的一个特殊的牵引力测试轨道上在受控条件下进行的。在不同的拖拉机前进速度下收集数据,并使用响应面法(RSM)对性能参数进行建模和优化,这是一种广泛用于多因素优化的统计方法。目前的研究结果表明,在5.48 km - h-1的速度下,520 mm的拉杆高度产生的拉力最大(47.4 kN),而在8.33 km - h-1的速度下,相同的高度产生的拉力最大(78.75 kW),比油耗最低(267.03 g kWh-1)。统计分析证实牵引车牵引力高度和牵引车速度对牵引车牵引力和燃油消耗均有显著影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The impact of tractor drawbar height on performance and optimization using response surface methodology.

The impact of tractor drawbar height on performance and optimization using response surface methodology.

The impact of tractor drawbar height on performance and optimization using response surface methodology.

The impact of tractor drawbar height on performance and optimization using response surface methodology.

This study explores the impact of tractor drawbar height (520, 530 and 540 mm from the ground) on key performance indicators, including pulling force, fuel consumption, pulling power and overall tractor efficiency. Present experiments were conducted on a special pulling power test track under controlled conditions at the Directorate of Agricultural Equipment and Machinery Test Centre of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Data were collected at different tractor forward speeds and performance parameters were modeled and optimized using Response Surface Methodology (RSM), a statistical approach widely used for multi-factor optimization. Present findings revealed that a drawbar height of 520 mm yielded the highest pulling force (47.4 kN) at a speed of 5.48 km h-1, while the same height combined with a speed of 8.33 km h-1 produced the maximum pulling power (78.75 kW) and the lowest specific fuel consumption (267.03 g kWh-1). Statistical analysis confirmed that both drawbar height and tractor speed had significant effects on pulling force and fuel consumption (P < 0.05). However, for overall tractor efficiency, only tractor speed showed a significance. The developed RSM models demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with an R² value of 0.98 for pulling force and error metrics such as RMSE of 0.42% for efficiency, highlighting the reliability of the approach. The study concludes that optimizing the drawbar height and tractor speed not only improves pulling performance but also enhances fuel efficiency, offering a practical framework for achieving sustainable agricultural practices. Present findings emphasize the critical role of drawbar height adjustments in minimizing energy losses and maximizing operational efficiency during field operations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信