肌内注射四环素和肩峰下注射曲安奈德治疗肩袖肌腱炎的疗效比较:一项随机试验。

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rap/rkae150
Amir Hossein Orandi, Amirpasha Mansour, Nima Bagheri, Hossein Majedi, Seyed Ali Emami Meibodi, Seyed Khalil Pestehei, Peyman Saberian
{"title":"肌内注射四环素和肩峰下注射曲安奈德治疗肩袖肌腱炎的疗效比较:一项随机试验。","authors":"Amir Hossein Orandi, Amirpasha Mansour, Nima Bagheri, Hossein Majedi, Seyed Ali Emami Meibodi, Seyed Khalil Pestehei, Peyman Saberian","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkae150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Rotator cuff tendinitis (RCT) is a tendon inflammation often following subacromial impingement syndrome. One of the non-surgical management modalities for RCT is subacromial injection of corticosteroids. Some studies have claimed a correlation between ACTH (Adrenocorticotropic Hormone) deficiency and rotator cuff lesions; hence, intramuscular ACTH analogue injection has been recommended as an option. This research aimed to compare the effectiveness of these two treatment methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a study with 86 patients suffering from RCT. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 43; one group received a subacromial injection of 40 mg of triamcinolone acetonide, while the other group received 1 mg of intramuscular tetracosactide injection. We recorded the Constant-Murley (CM) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for each patient before and 4 weeks after injections to measure pain acuity and joint functionality. Later, we compared and analysed the two scores in each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the statistical analysis, the mean ages of the participants in the triamcinolone and tetracosactide groups were 53.21 ± 11.37 and 54.56 ± 11.98, respectively. Both groups demonstrated an improvement in VAS for pain and CM scores (<i>P</i> < 0.05). However, the VAS for pain score decreased, and the CM score increased more significantly in the triamcinolone group than in the tetracosactide group (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although both treatment methods exhibit promise for pain relief, subacromial injection of triamcinolone appears more efficacious than intramuscular injection of tetracosactide in patients with RCT, based on a 4-week follow-up.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir, IRCT20240110060673N1.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"9 1","pages":"rkae150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703363/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparison of the efficacy of intramuscular tetracosactide and subacromial triamcinolone injection in rotator cuff tendinitis: a randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Hossein Orandi, Amirpasha Mansour, Nima Bagheri, Hossein Majedi, Seyed Ali Emami Meibodi, Seyed Khalil Pestehei, Peyman Saberian\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rap/rkae150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Rotator cuff tendinitis (RCT) is a tendon inflammation often following subacromial impingement syndrome. One of the non-surgical management modalities for RCT is subacromial injection of corticosteroids. Some studies have claimed a correlation between ACTH (Adrenocorticotropic Hormone) deficiency and rotator cuff lesions; hence, intramuscular ACTH analogue injection has been recommended as an option. This research aimed to compare the effectiveness of these two treatment methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a study with 86 patients suffering from RCT. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 43; one group received a subacromial injection of 40 mg of triamcinolone acetonide, while the other group received 1 mg of intramuscular tetracosactide injection. We recorded the Constant-Murley (CM) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for each patient before and 4 weeks after injections to measure pain acuity and joint functionality. Later, we compared and analysed the two scores in each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the statistical analysis, the mean ages of the participants in the triamcinolone and tetracosactide groups were 53.21 ± 11.37 and 54.56 ± 11.98, respectively. Both groups demonstrated an improvement in VAS for pain and CM scores (<i>P</i> < 0.05). However, the VAS for pain score decreased, and the CM score increased more significantly in the triamcinolone group than in the tetracosactide group (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although both treatment methods exhibit promise for pain relief, subacromial injection of triamcinolone appears more efficacious than intramuscular injection of tetracosactide in patients with RCT, based on a 4-week follow-up.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir, IRCT20240110060673N1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"rkae150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703363/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkae150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkae150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肩袖肌腱炎(RCT)是一种肌腱炎症,常伴随肩峰下撞击综合征。RCT的非手术治疗方式之一是肩峰下注射皮质类固醇。一些研究声称ACTH(促肾上腺皮质激素)缺乏与肩袖病变之间存在相关性;因此,肌内注射促肾上腺皮质激素类似物被推荐为一种选择。本研究旨在比较这两种治疗方法的有效性。方法:采用随机对照试验对86例患者进行研究。患者随机分为两组,每组43人;一组患者肩峰下注射曲安奈德40 mg,另一组患者肌注四环苷1 mg。记录每位患者注射前和注射后4周的Constant-Murley (CM)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分,以测量疼痛敏锐度和关节功能。随后,我们对每组的两个分数进行了比较和分析。结果:经统计分析,曲安奈德组和四环苷组患者平均年龄分别为53.21±11.37岁和54.56±11.98岁。结论:尽管两种治疗方法都有缓解疼痛的希望,但基于4周随访的随机对照试验显示,肩峰下注射曲安奈德似乎比肌肉注射四环星苷更有效。试验注册:伊朗临床试验注册中心,https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir, IRCT20240110060673N1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The comparison of the efficacy of intramuscular tetracosactide and subacromial triamcinolone injection in rotator cuff tendinitis: a randomized trial.

Objectives: Rotator cuff tendinitis (RCT) is a tendon inflammation often following subacromial impingement syndrome. One of the non-surgical management modalities for RCT is subacromial injection of corticosteroids. Some studies have claimed a correlation between ACTH (Adrenocorticotropic Hormone) deficiency and rotator cuff lesions; hence, intramuscular ACTH analogue injection has been recommended as an option. This research aimed to compare the effectiveness of these two treatment methods.

Methods: We conducted a study with 86 patients suffering from RCT. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 43; one group received a subacromial injection of 40 mg of triamcinolone acetonide, while the other group received 1 mg of intramuscular tetracosactide injection. We recorded the Constant-Murley (CM) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for each patient before and 4 weeks after injections to measure pain acuity and joint functionality. Later, we compared and analysed the two scores in each group.

Results: Based on the statistical analysis, the mean ages of the participants in the triamcinolone and tetracosactide groups were 53.21 ± 11.37 and 54.56 ± 11.98, respectively. Both groups demonstrated an improvement in VAS for pain and CM scores (P < 0.05). However, the VAS for pain score decreased, and the CM score increased more significantly in the triamcinolone group than in the tetracosactide group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Although both treatment methods exhibit promise for pain relief, subacromial injection of triamcinolone appears more efficacious than intramuscular injection of tetracosactide in patients with RCT, based on a 4-week follow-up.

Trial registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir, IRCT20240110060673N1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信