Kristina M Haebich, Hayley Darke, Francesca Lami, Alice Maier, Anita K Chisholm, Alex Ure, Natasha L Hogan, Yu Fan Eng, Jacquie Wrennall, Stephen J C Hearps, Daryl Efron, Nicki Joshua, Gabriel Dabscheck, Kathryn N North, Vicki A Anderson, Jonathan M Payne
{"title":"家庭远程医疗与面对面儿科神经心理测试的一致性、可靠性、可行性和可接受性:一项人内交叉研究","authors":"Kristina M Haebich, Hayley Darke, Francesca Lami, Alice Maier, Anita K Chisholm, Alex Ure, Natasha L Hogan, Yu Fan Eng, Jacquie Wrennall, Stephen J C Hearps, Daryl Efron, Nicki Joshua, Gabriel Dabscheck, Kathryn N North, Vicki A Anderson, Jonathan M Payne","doi":"10.1037/neu0000989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is unclear whether pediatric telehealth-delivered neuropsychology test results are comparable to those obtained face-to-face. This study reports results on (a) the agreement/reliability and (b) the feasibility and acceptability of telehealth neuropsychology testing in Australian children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a quasiprospective repeated-measures A followed by B:B followed by A crossover design, participants (N = 36), children with neurofibromatosis type 1, autism, and from the general population underwent face-to-face and telehealth testing using a trained parent facilitator. Measures included Full Scale IQ from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Australian and New Zealand Standardised Fifth Edition; Word Reading, Spelling, and Numerical Operations subtests from the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Australian and New Zealand Standardised Third Edition; Comprehension of Instructions; Score!; Formulated Sentences; Rey Complex Figure Test; and the California Verbal Learning Test. Children, parents, and clinicians also completed a feasibility and acceptability survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Predominantly high agreement between face-to-face and telehealth intelligence and academic scores were identified from intraclass correlation coefficients, independent of age and retest period. Intraclass correlation coefficient values were excellent for Full Scale IQ, Spelling and Numerical Operations (0.91-0.95), good for all intelligence index scores, reading, verbal learning and expressive language (range, 0.76-0.89), moderate for verbal recall, comprehension of instructions and copy accuracy (range, 0.63-0.74), and poor for sustained attention (0.23). Reliable change indices revealed stable test scores across most neuropsychological tests. Telehealth-delivered neuropsychology testing was satisfactory according to children, parents, and clinicians, although in-person was slightly preferred over telehealth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support the use of home-based telehealth testing in pediatric populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":"39 2","pages":"172-186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement, reliability, feasibility, and acceptability of home-based telehealth versus face-to-face pediatric neuropsychological testing: A within-person crossover study.\",\"authors\":\"Kristina M Haebich, Hayley Darke, Francesca Lami, Alice Maier, Anita K Chisholm, Alex Ure, Natasha L Hogan, Yu Fan Eng, Jacquie Wrennall, Stephen J C Hearps, Daryl Efron, Nicki Joshua, Gabriel Dabscheck, Kathryn N North, Vicki A Anderson, Jonathan M Payne\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/neu0000989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is unclear whether pediatric telehealth-delivered neuropsychology test results are comparable to those obtained face-to-face. This study reports results on (a) the agreement/reliability and (b) the feasibility and acceptability of telehealth neuropsychology testing in Australian children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a quasiprospective repeated-measures A followed by B:B followed by A crossover design, participants (N = 36), children with neurofibromatosis type 1, autism, and from the general population underwent face-to-face and telehealth testing using a trained parent facilitator. Measures included Full Scale IQ from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Australian and New Zealand Standardised Fifth Edition; Word Reading, Spelling, and Numerical Operations subtests from the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Australian and New Zealand Standardised Third Edition; Comprehension of Instructions; Score!; Formulated Sentences; Rey Complex Figure Test; and the California Verbal Learning Test. Children, parents, and clinicians also completed a feasibility and acceptability survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Predominantly high agreement between face-to-face and telehealth intelligence and academic scores were identified from intraclass correlation coefficients, independent of age and retest period. Intraclass correlation coefficient values were excellent for Full Scale IQ, Spelling and Numerical Operations (0.91-0.95), good for all intelligence index scores, reading, verbal learning and expressive language (range, 0.76-0.89), moderate for verbal recall, comprehension of instructions and copy accuracy (range, 0.63-0.74), and poor for sustained attention (0.23). Reliable change indices revealed stable test scores across most neuropsychological tests. Telehealth-delivered neuropsychology testing was satisfactory according to children, parents, and clinicians, although in-person was slightly preferred over telehealth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support the use of home-based telehealth testing in pediatric populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\"39 2\",\"pages\":\"172-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000989\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000989","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:尚不清楚儿童远程医疗传递的神经心理学测试结果是否与面对面获得的结果具有可比性。本研究报告了(a)一致性/可靠性和(b)澳大利亚儿童和青少年远程医疗神经心理学测试的可行性和可接受性。方法:采用准前瞻性重复测量法a与B:B与交叉设计,参与者(N = 36),患有1型神经纤维瘤病、自闭症的儿童,以及来自一般人群的儿童,在训练有素的家长协调员的指导下进行面对面和远程健康测试。测试包括韦氏儿童智力量表(澳大利亚和新西兰标准化第五版)的全面智商;韦氏个人成就测试的单词阅读,拼写和数值运算子测试-澳大利亚和新西兰标准化第三版;对指令的理解;分数!制定的句子;雷伊复形检验;以及加州语言学习测试。儿童、家长和临床医生还完成了可行性和可接受性调查。结果:面对面和远程医疗的智力与学业成绩在班级内的相关系数中具有显著的高一致性,不受年龄和复测时间的影响。班级内相关系数值在全面智商、拼写和数字运算方面表现优异(0.91-0.95),在所有智力指标得分、阅读、口头学习和表达语言方面表现良好(范围为0.76-0.89),在口头回忆、指令理解和复制准确性方面表现中等(范围为0.63-0.74),在持续注意方面表现较差(0.23)。可靠的变化指数显示,大多数神经心理学测试的测试分数都很稳定。根据儿童、家长和临床医生的意见,远程医疗提供的神经心理学测试是令人满意的,尽管面对面比远程医疗更受欢迎。结论:研究结果支持在儿科人群中使用基于家庭的远程医疗检测。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Agreement, reliability, feasibility, and acceptability of home-based telehealth versus face-to-face pediatric neuropsychological testing: A within-person crossover study.
Objective: It is unclear whether pediatric telehealth-delivered neuropsychology test results are comparable to those obtained face-to-face. This study reports results on (a) the agreement/reliability and (b) the feasibility and acceptability of telehealth neuropsychology testing in Australian children and adolescents.
Method: Using a quasiprospective repeated-measures A followed by B:B followed by A crossover design, participants (N = 36), children with neurofibromatosis type 1, autism, and from the general population underwent face-to-face and telehealth testing using a trained parent facilitator. Measures included Full Scale IQ from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Australian and New Zealand Standardised Fifth Edition; Word Reading, Spelling, and Numerical Operations subtests from the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Australian and New Zealand Standardised Third Edition; Comprehension of Instructions; Score!; Formulated Sentences; Rey Complex Figure Test; and the California Verbal Learning Test. Children, parents, and clinicians also completed a feasibility and acceptability survey.
Results: Predominantly high agreement between face-to-face and telehealth intelligence and academic scores were identified from intraclass correlation coefficients, independent of age and retest period. Intraclass correlation coefficient values were excellent for Full Scale IQ, Spelling and Numerical Operations (0.91-0.95), good for all intelligence index scores, reading, verbal learning and expressive language (range, 0.76-0.89), moderate for verbal recall, comprehension of instructions and copy accuracy (range, 0.63-0.74), and poor for sustained attention (0.23). Reliable change indices revealed stable test scores across most neuropsychological tests. Telehealth-delivered neuropsychology testing was satisfactory according to children, parents, and clinicians, although in-person was slightly preferred over telehealth.
Conclusions: Findings support the use of home-based telehealth testing in pediatric populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.