激光与常规方法在正畸患者牙周上纤维切开术中的比较疗效:系统综述。

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of lasers in medical sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34172/jlms.2024.68
Farhad Sobouti, Alireza Kashiri, Sepideh Dadgar, Mehdi Aryana, Osama Eissa, Neda Hakimiha, Mohadeseh Heidari
{"title":"激光与常规方法在正畸患者牙周上纤维切开术中的比较疗效:系统综述。","authors":"Farhad Sobouti, Alireza Kashiri, Sepideh Dadgar, Mehdi Aryana, Osama Eissa, Neda Hakimiha, Mohadeseh Heidari","doi":"10.34172/jlms.2024.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The relapse of rotated teeth is a significant concern in orthodontics, and circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy (CSF) presents a potential solution. Traditionally, CSF is performed using a surgical blade; however, employing a laser may reduce complications. This study aimed to systematically review the literature comparing laser-assisted CSF with conventional methods in orthodontic patients. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive search was conducted across the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases using a specific search strategy up to June 16, 2024. Data extraction was done in accordance with the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. <b>Results:</b> Initially, a total of 293 articles were identified through the search process, and ultimately, four were selected for analysis based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies involved various types of lasers including diode (810 to 940 nm), Er:YAG, and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers, and examined the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in conjunction with surgical interventions. Regarding relapse rates, two studies reported that both laser and surgical blade techniques demonstrated comparable efficacy, while adjunctive LLLT was effective in reducing relapse. In the other two studies, the use of laser therapy was found to be effective in decreasing relapse rates compared to the control group. Pain assessment results were inconclusive; one study reported reduced pain in the laser group, while another found no significant difference in pain levels between the laser and blade techniques. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in periodontal pocket depth or gingival recession between the two methods. <b>Conclusion:</b> Within the limitations of the current systematic review, our findings indicate that there is no significant difference in relapse rates between laser and blade CSF procedures. Furthermore, our results suggest that the incorporation of photobiomodulation at higher doses is correlated with a reduction in relapse rates following fiberotomy procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":16224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of lasers in medical sciences","volume":"15 ","pages":"e68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Efficacy of Laser Versus Conventional Method in the Success of Circumferential Supracrestal Fiberotomy in Orthodontic Patients: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Farhad Sobouti, Alireza Kashiri, Sepideh Dadgar, Mehdi Aryana, Osama Eissa, Neda Hakimiha, Mohadeseh Heidari\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jlms.2024.68\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The relapse of rotated teeth is a significant concern in orthodontics, and circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy (CSF) presents a potential solution. Traditionally, CSF is performed using a surgical blade; however, employing a laser may reduce complications. This study aimed to systematically review the literature comparing laser-assisted CSF with conventional methods in orthodontic patients. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive search was conducted across the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases using a specific search strategy up to June 16, 2024. Data extraction was done in accordance with the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. <b>Results:</b> Initially, a total of 293 articles were identified through the search process, and ultimately, four were selected for analysis based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies involved various types of lasers including diode (810 to 940 nm), Er:YAG, and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers, and examined the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in conjunction with surgical interventions. Regarding relapse rates, two studies reported that both laser and surgical blade techniques demonstrated comparable efficacy, while adjunctive LLLT was effective in reducing relapse. In the other two studies, the use of laser therapy was found to be effective in decreasing relapse rates compared to the control group. Pain assessment results were inconclusive; one study reported reduced pain in the laser group, while another found no significant difference in pain levels between the laser and blade techniques. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in periodontal pocket depth or gingival recession between the two methods. <b>Conclusion:</b> Within the limitations of the current systematic review, our findings indicate that there is no significant difference in relapse rates between laser and blade CSF procedures. Furthermore, our results suggest that the incorporation of photobiomodulation at higher doses is correlated with a reduction in relapse rates following fiberotomy procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of lasers in medical sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"e68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822236/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of lasers in medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2024.68\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of lasers in medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2024.68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:牙齿旋转的复发是正畸治疗中一个重要的问题,而环上切纤维术(CSF)提出了一个潜在的解决方案。传统上,CSF是使用手术刀片进行的;然而,使用激光可以减少并发症。本研究旨在系统回顾文献,比较激光辅助脑脊液与常规方法在正畸患者中的应用。方法:使用特定的搜索策略,对PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库进行综合搜索,截止到2024年6月16日。根据定义的纳入和排除标准进行数据提取。结果:最初,通过检索过程共识别出293篇文章,最终根据特定的纳入和排除标准筛选出4篇进行分析。研究涉及各种类型的激光器,包括二极管(810至940 nm), Er:YAG和Er,Cr:YSGG激光器,并检查了低水平激光治疗(LLLT)与手术干预相结合的效果。关于复发率,两项研究报告激光和手术刀片技术均显示出相当的疗效,而辅助LLLT可有效减少复发率。在另外两项研究中,与对照组相比,使用激光治疗在降低复发率方面被发现是有效的。疼痛评估结果尚无定论;一项研究报告了激光组的疼痛减轻,而另一项研究发现激光和刀片技术之间的疼痛程度没有显著差异。此外,两种方法在牙周袋深度和牙龈退缩方面没有显著差异。结论:在当前系统综述的局限性内,我们的研究结果表明激光和刀片脑脊液手术在复发率上没有显著差异。此外,我们的研究结果表明,高剂量的光生物调节与纤维切开术后复发率的降低相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Efficacy of Laser Versus Conventional Method in the Success of Circumferential Supracrestal Fiberotomy in Orthodontic Patients: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: The relapse of rotated teeth is a significant concern in orthodontics, and circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy (CSF) presents a potential solution. Traditionally, CSF is performed using a surgical blade; however, employing a laser may reduce complications. This study aimed to systematically review the literature comparing laser-assisted CSF with conventional methods in orthodontic patients. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases using a specific search strategy up to June 16, 2024. Data extraction was done in accordance with the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Initially, a total of 293 articles were identified through the search process, and ultimately, four were selected for analysis based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies involved various types of lasers including diode (810 to 940 nm), Er:YAG, and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers, and examined the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in conjunction with surgical interventions. Regarding relapse rates, two studies reported that both laser and surgical blade techniques demonstrated comparable efficacy, while adjunctive LLLT was effective in reducing relapse. In the other two studies, the use of laser therapy was found to be effective in decreasing relapse rates compared to the control group. Pain assessment results were inconclusive; one study reported reduced pain in the laser group, while another found no significant difference in pain levels between the laser and blade techniques. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in periodontal pocket depth or gingival recession between the two methods. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the current systematic review, our findings indicate that there is no significant difference in relapse rates between laser and blade CSF procedures. Furthermore, our results suggest that the incorporation of photobiomodulation at higher doses is correlated with a reduction in relapse rates following fiberotomy procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of lasers in medical sciences
Journal of lasers in medical sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences " is a scientific quarterly publication of the Laser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. This journal received a scientific and research rank from the national medical publication committee. This Journal accepts original papers, review articles, case reports, brief reports, case series, photo assays, letters to the editor, and commentaries in the field of laser, or light in any fields of medicine such as the following medical specialties: -Dermatology -General and Vascular Surgery -Oncology -Cardiology -Dentistry -Urology -Rehabilitation -Ophthalmology -Otorhinolaryngology -Gynecology & Obstetrics -Internal Medicine -Orthopedics -Neurosurgery -Radiology -Pain Medicine (Algology) -Basic Sciences (Stem cell, Cellular and Molecular application and physic)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信