原发性孔源性视网膜脱离的内限制膜剥离:功能和形态学结果。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1055/a-2441-7791
Franziska Eckardt, Julian Klaas, Jakob Siedlecki, Benedikt Schworm, Leonie Franziska Keidel, Denise Vogt, Thomas Kreutzer, Siegfried Priglinger
{"title":"原发性孔源性视网膜脱离的内限制膜剥离:功能和形态学结果。","authors":"Franziska Eckardt, Julian Klaas, Jakob Siedlecki, Benedikt Schworm, Leonie Franziska Keidel, Denise Vogt, Thomas Kreutzer, Siegfried Priglinger","doi":"10.1055/a-2441-7791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on the repair of proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade B (PVR B) primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen consecutive eyes that underwent pars plana vitrectomy (ppV) with ILM peeling for PVR B (group 1) were matched to a cohort of 13 eyes with primary RRD without PVR and without ILM peeling (group 2). Minimum follow-up was 6 months, and all eyes were operated by the same surgeon. Preoperative characteristics (age, lens status, macula-ON/OFF) were similar in the two groups (p ≥ 0.113).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of follow-up, reattachment rates were comparable, with 92.3% in group 1 and 92.3% in group 2 (p = 1.0). Postoperative epiretinal membrane formation based on OCT was significantly reduced by ILM peeling (p = 0.04). Visual acuity was also comparable (group 1: 0.26 ± 0.29, group 2: 0.15 ± 0.17 logMAR; p = 0.125).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that intraoperative removal of the ILM in PVR B RRD can improve functional and morphological outcomes to levels obtained in uncomplicated RRD without PVR. ILM peeling does not appear to negatively affect postoperative visual acuity. Studies with longer follow-up are warranted to gauge a potential positive impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":17904,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","volume":"242 2","pages":"153-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Functional and Morphologic Results.\",\"authors\":\"Franziska Eckardt, Julian Klaas, Jakob Siedlecki, Benedikt Schworm, Leonie Franziska Keidel, Denise Vogt, Thomas Kreutzer, Siegfried Priglinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2441-7791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on the repair of proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade B (PVR B) primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen consecutive eyes that underwent pars plana vitrectomy (ppV) with ILM peeling for PVR B (group 1) were matched to a cohort of 13 eyes with primary RRD without PVR and without ILM peeling (group 2). Minimum follow-up was 6 months, and all eyes were operated by the same surgeon. Preoperative characteristics (age, lens status, macula-ON/OFF) were similar in the two groups (p ≥ 0.113).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of follow-up, reattachment rates were comparable, with 92.3% in group 1 and 92.3% in group 2 (p = 1.0). Postoperative epiretinal membrane formation based on OCT was significantly reduced by ILM peeling (p = 0.04). Visual acuity was also comparable (group 1: 0.26 ± 0.29, group 2: 0.15 ± 0.17 logMAR; p = 0.125).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that intraoperative removal of the ILM in PVR B RRD can improve functional and morphological outcomes to levels obtained in uncomplicated RRD without PVR. ILM peeling does not appear to negatively affect postoperative visual acuity. Studies with longer follow-up are warranted to gauge a potential positive impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"volume\":\"242 2\",\"pages\":\"153-159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825206/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2441-7791\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2441-7791","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨内限制膜(ILM)剥离对增殖性玻璃体视网膜病变B级(PVR B)原发性孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)修复的影响。方法:13只连续行玻璃体切割(ppV)合并ILM剥离治疗B型PVR的眼(1组)与13只原发RRD(无PVR,无ILM剥离)的眼(2组)相匹配。最短随访时间为6个月,所有眼均由同一位外科医生手术。两组患者术前特征(年龄、晶状体状态、黄斑开/关)相似(p≥0.113)。结果:随访结束时,再附着率具有可比性,1组为92.3%,2组为92.3% (p = 1.0)。术后基于OCT的视网膜前膜形成因ILM剥离而明显减少(p = 0.04)。视力也具有可比性(1组:0.26±0.29,2组:0.15±0.17 logMAR;p = 0.125)。结论:本研究提示术中切除PVR B RRD的ILM可以将功能和形态学结果改善到无PVR的无并发症RRD的水平。ILM剥落对术后视力没有负面影响。有必要进行更长的随访研究,以评估潜在的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Functional and Morphologic Results.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on the repair of proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade B (PVR B) primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods: Thirteen consecutive eyes that underwent pars plana vitrectomy (ppV) with ILM peeling for PVR B (group 1) were matched to a cohort of 13 eyes with primary RRD without PVR and without ILM peeling (group 2). Minimum follow-up was 6 months, and all eyes were operated by the same surgeon. Preoperative characteristics (age, lens status, macula-ON/OFF) were similar in the two groups (p ≥ 0.113).

Results: At the end of follow-up, reattachment rates were comparable, with 92.3% in group 1 and 92.3% in group 2 (p = 1.0). Postoperative epiretinal membrane formation based on OCT was significantly reduced by ILM peeling (p = 0.04). Visual acuity was also comparable (group 1: 0.26 ± 0.29, group 2: 0.15 ± 0.17 logMAR; p = 0.125).

Conclusion: This study suggests that intraoperative removal of the ILM in PVR B RRD can improve functional and morphological outcomes to levels obtained in uncomplicated RRD without PVR. ILM peeling does not appear to negatively affect postoperative visual acuity. Studies with longer follow-up are warranted to gauge a potential positive impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
235
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: -Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Klinik und Praxis: Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung - für Sie auf den Punkt gebracht und kritisch kommentiert, Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis, Top informiert - breite klinische Berichterstattung. -CME-Punkte sammeln mit dem Refresher: Effiziente, CME-zertifizierte Fortbildung, mit dem Refresher, 3 CME-Punkte pro Ausgabe - bis zu 36 CME-Punkte im Jahr!. -Aktuelle Rubriken mit echtem Nutzwert: Kurzreferate zu den wichtigsten Artikeln internationaler Zeitschriften, Schwerpunktthema in jedem Heft: Ausführliche Übersichtsarbeiten zu den wichtigsten Themen der Ophthalmologie – so behalten Sie das gesamte Fach im Blick!, Originalien mit den neuesten Entwicklungen, Übersichten zu den relevanten Themen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信