{"title":"转移性子宫内膜癌患者的同源重组修复基因突变:与临床特征和预后的关系","authors":"Ling Zhong, Ying Lin, Chunxiao Li, Haili Qian, Minghong Shen","doi":"10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the mutation rates of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes and the impact of these mutations on the clinical characteristics of metastatic endometrial cancer (EC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Somatic DNA from 895 patients with metastatic EC in the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Metastatic Events and Tropisms cohort was assessed for mutations in 10 HRR genes (<i>BRCA1</i>, <i>BRCA2</i>, <i>ATM</i>, <i>BARD1</i>, <i>BRIP1</i>, <i>PALB2</i>, <i>RAD51C</i>, <i>RAD51D</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, and <i>CDK12</i>). The correlation between the mutation status of HRR genes and the clinical characteristics of patients with metastatic EC was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Somatic mutations in HRR genes were detected in 106 (11.8%) patients with metastatic EC. Compared with nonmutation carriers, a greater proportion of carriers had endometrioid carcinoma (76.4% vs. 50.3%, p<0.001). Regarding the TCGA classification, the proportions of the <i>POLE</i>-ultramutated (<i>POLE</i>mut) and mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) subtypes were significantly greater among mutation carriers than noncarriers (20.8% vs. 0.4%, p<0.001; 34.9% vs. 11.9%, p<0.001, respectively). The carriers had a significantly lower frequency of <i>TP53</i> mutations than noncarriers (25.5% vs. 54.1%, p<0.001). Fewer mutation carriers than noncarriers had intra-abdominal and lung metastases (41.5% vs. 54.2%, p=0.014; 19.8% vs. 30.3%, p=0.026, respectively). The mutation status of HRR genes did not significantly affect the overall survival of patients with metastatic EC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Somatic HRR mutations are detected in 11.8% of metastatic EC. Compared with noncarriers, HRR mutation carriers in metastatic EC have higher proportions of endometrioid carcinoma, <i>POLE</i>mut, and dMMR subtypes, and unique metastatic patterns. However, the prognoses are similar regardless of HRR status.</p>","PeriodicalId":15868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mutations in homologous recombination repair genes in patients with metastatic endometrial cancer: association with clinical characteristics and prognosis.\",\"authors\":\"Ling Zhong, Ying Lin, Chunxiao Li, Haili Qian, Minghong Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e62\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the mutation rates of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes and the impact of these mutations on the clinical characteristics of metastatic endometrial cancer (EC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Somatic DNA from 895 patients with metastatic EC in the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Metastatic Events and Tropisms cohort was assessed for mutations in 10 HRR genes (<i>BRCA1</i>, <i>BRCA2</i>, <i>ATM</i>, <i>BARD1</i>, <i>BRIP1</i>, <i>PALB2</i>, <i>RAD51C</i>, <i>RAD51D</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, and <i>CDK12</i>). The correlation between the mutation status of HRR genes and the clinical characteristics of patients with metastatic EC was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Somatic mutations in HRR genes were detected in 106 (11.8%) patients with metastatic EC. Compared with nonmutation carriers, a greater proportion of carriers had endometrioid carcinoma (76.4% vs. 50.3%, p<0.001). Regarding the TCGA classification, the proportions of the <i>POLE</i>-ultramutated (<i>POLE</i>mut) and mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) subtypes were significantly greater among mutation carriers than noncarriers (20.8% vs. 0.4%, p<0.001; 34.9% vs. 11.9%, p<0.001, respectively). The carriers had a significantly lower frequency of <i>TP53</i> mutations than noncarriers (25.5% vs. 54.1%, p<0.001). Fewer mutation carriers than noncarriers had intra-abdominal and lung metastases (41.5% vs. 54.2%, p=0.014; 19.8% vs. 30.3%, p=0.026, respectively). The mutation status of HRR genes did not significantly affect the overall survival of patients with metastatic EC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Somatic HRR mutations are detected in 11.8% of metastatic EC. Compared with noncarriers, HRR mutation carriers in metastatic EC have higher proportions of endometrioid carcinoma, <i>POLE</i>mut, and dMMR subtypes, and unique metastatic patterns. However, the prognoses are similar regardless of HRR status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e62\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e62","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨同源重组修复(HRR)基因的突变率及其对转移性子宫内膜癌(EC)临床特征的影响。方法:在Memorial Sloan Kettering-Metastatic Events and Tropisms队列中,对895例转移性EC患者的体细胞DNA进行10个HRR基因(BRCA1、BRCA2、ATM、BARD1、BRIP1、PALB2、RAD51C、RAD51D、CHEK2和CDK12)突变的评估。评估HRR基因突变状态与转移性EC患者临床特征的相关性。结果:106例(11.8%)转移性EC患者检测到HRR基因体细胞突变。与非突变携带者相比,突变携带者患子宫内膜样癌的比例更高(76.4%比50.3%),突变携带者患超突变(POLEmut)和错配修复缺陷(dMMR)亚型的比例明显高于非携带者(20.8%比0.4%),pTP53突变比非携带者(25.5%比54.1%)。结论:11.8%的转移性EC中检测到体细胞HRR突变。与非携带者相比,HRR突变携带者在转移性EC中具有更高的子宫内膜样癌、POLEmut和dMMR亚型比例,并且具有独特的转移模式。然而,无论HRR状况如何,预后都是相似的。
Mutations in homologous recombination repair genes in patients with metastatic endometrial cancer: association with clinical characteristics and prognosis.
Objective: To evaluate the mutation rates of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes and the impact of these mutations on the clinical characteristics of metastatic endometrial cancer (EC).
Methods: Somatic DNA from 895 patients with metastatic EC in the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Metastatic Events and Tropisms cohort was assessed for mutations in 10 HRR genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, CHEK2, and CDK12). The correlation between the mutation status of HRR genes and the clinical characteristics of patients with metastatic EC was evaluated.
Results: Somatic mutations in HRR genes were detected in 106 (11.8%) patients with metastatic EC. Compared with nonmutation carriers, a greater proportion of carriers had endometrioid carcinoma (76.4% vs. 50.3%, p<0.001). Regarding the TCGA classification, the proportions of the POLE-ultramutated (POLEmut) and mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) subtypes were significantly greater among mutation carriers than noncarriers (20.8% vs. 0.4%, p<0.001; 34.9% vs. 11.9%, p<0.001, respectively). The carriers had a significantly lower frequency of TP53 mutations than noncarriers (25.5% vs. 54.1%, p<0.001). Fewer mutation carriers than noncarriers had intra-abdominal and lung metastases (41.5% vs. 54.2%, p=0.014; 19.8% vs. 30.3%, p=0.026, respectively). The mutation status of HRR genes did not significantly affect the overall survival of patients with metastatic EC.
Conclusion: Somatic HRR mutations are detected in 11.8% of metastatic EC. Compared with noncarriers, HRR mutation carriers in metastatic EC have higher proportions of endometrioid carcinoma, POLEmut, and dMMR subtypes, and unique metastatic patterns. However, the prognoses are similar regardless of HRR status.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO) is an official publication of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Abbreviated title is ''J Gynecol Oncol''. It was launched in 1990. The JGO''s aim is to publish the highest quality manuscripts dedicated to the advancement of care of the patients with gynecologic cancer. It is an international peer-reviewed periodical journal that is published bimonthly (January, March, May, July, September, and November). Supplement numbers are at times published. The journal publishes editorials, original and review articles, correspondence, book review, etc.