Leah Weinberg, Luci A. Martin, Kristina M. Post, Emily J. Ricketts
{"title":"心理学家对强迫症的诊断准确性和治疗建议。","authors":"Leah Weinberg, Luci A. Martin, Kristina M. Post, Emily J. Ricketts","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating condition prevalent in up to 2.3% of the population, yet obsessive-compulsive symptoms are commonly misidentified by mental health professionals, adversely impacting treatment recommendations. This study examined OCD misidentification rates across two different types of obsessions, the influence of misidentification on treatment recommendation, and attitudes associated with clinicians' decisions surrounding the diagnosis of OCD and treatment recommendations in a sample of 110 licensed psychologists. Results showed that over one-third (35.0%) of participants incorrectly diagnosed two vignettes, representing symptoms of sexual orientation OCD (SO-OCD) and symmetry. Of those who correctly diagnosed the vignettes, about half of participants (symmetry = 55.4%; SO-OCD = 47.1%) recommended exposure and response prevention (ERP) as the primary treatment choice. Participants who endorsed greater client empowerment were more likely to misdiagnose the SO-OCD vignette (<i>t</i>(108) = 2.97, <i>p</i> = 0.004). Less experience with evidence-based practice and negative attitudes toward evidence-based practice were associated with the choice of treatment other than ERP (<i>t</i>(71) = −2.98, <i>p</i> = 0.004 and <i>t</i>(72) = 3.40, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). Elevated OCD misdiagnosis and its adverse impact on treatment recommendations, as well as knowledge of factors contributing to misdiagnosis and mistreatment, imply the need for greater education and training.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"81 5","pages":"324-333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychologists' Diagnostic Accuracy and Treatment Recommendations for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder\",\"authors\":\"Leah Weinberg, Luci A. Martin, Kristina M. Post, Emily J. Ricketts\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jclp.23775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating condition prevalent in up to 2.3% of the population, yet obsessive-compulsive symptoms are commonly misidentified by mental health professionals, adversely impacting treatment recommendations. This study examined OCD misidentification rates across two different types of obsessions, the influence of misidentification on treatment recommendation, and attitudes associated with clinicians' decisions surrounding the diagnosis of OCD and treatment recommendations in a sample of 110 licensed psychologists. Results showed that over one-third (35.0%) of participants incorrectly diagnosed two vignettes, representing symptoms of sexual orientation OCD (SO-OCD) and symmetry. Of those who correctly diagnosed the vignettes, about half of participants (symmetry = 55.4%; SO-OCD = 47.1%) recommended exposure and response prevention (ERP) as the primary treatment choice. Participants who endorsed greater client empowerment were more likely to misdiagnose the SO-OCD vignette (<i>t</i>(108) = 2.97, <i>p</i> = 0.004). Less experience with evidence-based practice and negative attitudes toward evidence-based practice were associated with the choice of treatment other than ERP (<i>t</i>(71) = −2.98, <i>p</i> = 0.004 and <i>t</i>(72) = 3.40, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). Elevated OCD misdiagnosis and its adverse impact on treatment recommendations, as well as knowledge of factors contributing to misdiagnosis and mistreatment, imply the need for greater education and training.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"81 5\",\"pages\":\"324-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23775\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
强迫症(OCD)是一种使人衰弱的疾病,患病率高达2.3%,但强迫症症状通常被精神卫生专业人员错误识别,对治疗建议产生不利影响。本研究调查了两种不同类型强迫症的误认率,误认对治疗建议的影响,以及与临床医生围绕强迫症诊断和治疗建议的决定相关的态度,样本为110名有执照的心理学家。结果显示,超过三分之一(35.0%)的参与者错误地诊断了两个小插曲,代表性取向强迫症(SO-OCD)和对称性的症状。在那些正确诊断出小插曲的人中,大约有一半的参与者(对称= 55.4%;SO-OCD = 47.1%)推荐暴露和反应预防(ERP)作为主要治疗选择。认可更多客户授权的参与者更有可能误诊SO-OCD小插曲(t(108) = 2.97, p = 0.004)。缺乏循证实践经验和对循证实践持消极态度与选择非ERP治疗相关(t(71) = -2.98, p = 0.004, t(72) = 3.40, p
Psychologists' Diagnostic Accuracy and Treatment Recommendations for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating condition prevalent in up to 2.3% of the population, yet obsessive-compulsive symptoms are commonly misidentified by mental health professionals, adversely impacting treatment recommendations. This study examined OCD misidentification rates across two different types of obsessions, the influence of misidentification on treatment recommendation, and attitudes associated with clinicians' decisions surrounding the diagnosis of OCD and treatment recommendations in a sample of 110 licensed psychologists. Results showed that over one-third (35.0%) of participants incorrectly diagnosed two vignettes, representing symptoms of sexual orientation OCD (SO-OCD) and symmetry. Of those who correctly diagnosed the vignettes, about half of participants (symmetry = 55.4%; SO-OCD = 47.1%) recommended exposure and response prevention (ERP) as the primary treatment choice. Participants who endorsed greater client empowerment were more likely to misdiagnose the SO-OCD vignette (t(108) = 2.97, p = 0.004). Less experience with evidence-based practice and negative attitudes toward evidence-based practice were associated with the choice of treatment other than ERP (t(71) = −2.98, p = 0.004 and t(72) = 3.40, p < 0.001, respectively). Elevated OCD misdiagnosis and its adverse impact on treatment recommendations, as well as knowledge of factors contributing to misdiagnosis and mistreatment, imply the need for greater education and training.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.